고령자의 후견제도와 자기결정권
Conservatorship for the Aged and Right of Self-Determination
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The current Korean Civil Act fails to provide legal consideration to protect such aged people. However, in Korea there are only conservatorship and guardianship as general provisions to support those who have lost legal competence or have legally limited competence. The primary purpose of the existing systems is to protect incompetent persons. However, though it is to protect incompetent persons by discriminating them from competent persons, on the other hand it is actually utilized as a means to protect competent persons according to the legal purpose of protecting the safety of transactions, too. Furthermore, it is not too much to say that the current guardianship is almost becoming a dead letter due to its impracticability. The current guardianship is difficult to smoothly protect aged people as well as mentally handicapped persons depending on their competence levels because it deprives or limits legal capacity regardless of their competence levels. Also, it basically protects mentally handicapped persons only, while it does not protect physically disabled persons. This study, under the principles such as protection of principal, respect of self-decision, protection depending on supplementarity and necessity, private conservatorship and partial conservatorship, and in the aspects of legislation, suggests adult conservatorship systems including a tentatively named Voluntary Adult Conservatorship Act as a prior assistant and protective system, a tentatively named Legal Conservatorship Act as a posterior defensive and protective system.
참고문헌 (22)
- "韓國民法總則" (1981), 博英社
- "法定後見人制度", (3) (2000), 亞細亞女性法學硏究所
- "成年後見制度의 導入方案에 관한 硏究" (2000)
- "醫療行爲의 刑法的 限界" (2001)
- "民法上 後見制度의 問題點-限定治産,禁治産制度를 중심으로" (1998), 亞細亞女性法學硏究所
- "現行法上 無能力者保護의 制度的 限界 債權法에 있어서의 自由와 責任" (1994)
- "腦死 및 臟器移植에 관한 立法論的 硏究" (1998)
- "高齡化 社會에 있어서의 後見制度", (11) (1997), 韓國家族法學會
- "成年後見制度에 관한 연구" (1999)
- "연구보고 99-17 高齡者의 行爲能力과 財産管理支援制度" (1999), 韓國法制硏究院
- "우리나라 後見制度의 問題點과 改善方案", (3) (2000), 亞細.亞女性法學硏究所
- "自己決定權と公序家族,成年後見,腦死", 2 (1999)
- "なぜいま自己決定權か自己決定權の今日的意義", 28 (1999)
- "能力に關する覺書", 1141 (1998)
- "成年後見制度私案(三)", 1076 (1995)
- "成年後見制度私案(二)", (1075) (1995)
- "被保護成年者の硏究" (1996), 勁草書房
- "任意成年後見制度の必要性について", 1141 (1998)
- "高齡社會の成年後見法" (1999), 有斐閣
- "新訂民法總則" (1965), 岩波書店
- "成年後見法制の硏究, 上卷" (2000), 成文堂
- "憲法上の自己決定權の意義", 29(4) (1996)
