親生關係 證明에 있어서의 DNA 鑑定의 限界
A Study on the Limits of DNA Paternity Testing
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
DNA paternity testing is the most advanced and accurate method available for resolving parentage for medical, legal or personal reasons. It is even believed to be an absolutely perfect tool, which can discover the truth in any circumstances. Courts generally accept DNA paternity test results. However there are limits in the DNA paternity testing. It cannot successfully give a clear answer to the question, "Is he a biological father to the plaintiff?". It only shows a probability that he might be. If we know the distribution of given alleles in a certain population, we can solve parternity indices or paternity probabilities on the premise that all the alleles tested are independent to one another under Hardy-Weinberg's equilibrium. If the allele distribution of any sub-population group is entirely different from that of a certain population, it is possible that the paternity index might be either under- or over-estimated. We couldn't calculate these indices or probabilities in difficult trials such as fatherless or motherless cases. In these cases, judges should confirm other collateral evidences and impose specified premises on these testings. Nevertheless our judges can not play any role in these testing, because they have no information about testing experts and their laboratory facilities in Korea. Therefore it is mandatory to set up a database concerning these issues. These information will help not only judges but also lawyers in paternity trials.
참고문헌 (32)
- "형사절차에서 DNA분석에 대한 규범적 통제" (2004), 全北大學校 博士學位論文
- "自由心證主義小考", 3 (1993), 釜山大學校
- "인지청구의 소에 있어서 사망한 부와 딸의 친자여부에 대한 유전자 감정방법" (2000), Jurist
- "인지청구의 소에 있어서 사망한 부와 딸의 친자여부에 대한 유전자 감정방법", 15 (2001)
- "親子鑑定의 結果와 親子關係訴訟의 關係", 9 (2000)
- "국내여러기관들의 친자감정 결과 비교", 26(1) (2004)
- "DNA 감정결과의 증거능력과 증명력 피고인측 변호인의 입장에서", pp.~2 (1994)
- "유전자감정결과의 증거사용에 관하여", 12(1) (2001)
- "專門訴訟의 鑑定節次에 대하여 建築鑑定의 標準節次를 중심으로", 51(11) (2002)
- "DNA감정기술의 발달과 친자관계결정법리의 변천", 7(1) (2000)
- "親生子關係와 DNA鑑定", 13 (2000)
- "新民事訴訟法" (2002), 博英社
- "법의학의 세계" (2003), 살림출판사
- "친모의 유전자형을 알 수 없을 때 친자확인 유전자 검사", 23(1) (1999)
- "친생자감정의 현황과 문제점", pp.~385 (1993)
- "친자관계소송과 사자에 대한 DNA감정 Yves Montand 사건을 중심으로" (2000)
- "DNA鑑定による親子關係推定とその限界", 65 (2000)
- "現代家族法 I" (1992), 勁草書房
- "Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree", 110(1) (2000)
- "The use of the polymerase chain reaction", pp.~31 (1991)
- "Principles Of Genetics" (1984)
- "Courts face the exciting and the inevitable: DNA in civil trials", 23 (2004)
- "A Computer Simulation Study of VNTR population Genetics", pp.~135 (1993)
- "Hypervariable 'Minisatellite regions in Human DNA", pp.~67 (1985)
- "Positive Identification of an Immigration Test-Case Using Human DNA Fingerprints", pp.~67 (1985)
- "Allele Frequency and its forensic application of STR Y27 in Korean Males", 11(5) (1996)
- "The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) The Second Generation of DNA Analysis methods takes the stand" (2003)
- "Specific Synthesis of DNA in Vitro via a polymerase Catalysed chain reaction" (1987)
- "Short tandem repeat-based identification of individuals and parents", 42(3) (2001)
- "Personal Identification Using Y-Chromosomal Short Tandem Repeats From Bodily Fluids Mixed With Semen", 22(3) (2001)
- "population genetics in the forensic DNA debates", pp.~89 (1992)
- "A Highly Polymorphic Locus in Human DNA", pp.~77 (1980)