가족법의 개정과 입법
Analysis on the Amendment of Family Law in Korean Civil Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean Civil Act has experienced, especially in the field of family law and inheritance, more than 10 serial amendments also in Naughties: many articles are deleted, revised or inserted, if proven to be needed. Even though the meaning of amendment is to reform or upgrade existing state of things, not to make a change for the worse, every now and then its consequences emerge to be undesirable. In other words, some recent amendments could not testify to his capability for work sufficiently linguistically and in the substance: for instance, newly revised articles on engagements, articles with an idiomatic construction 「That the same shall not apply where [or when]…」 and so on. The institutional change should make a profit and at the same time make the institution expansive and growing, but it is neither noticeable nor phenomenal from all angles of the amendment of law. The amendment of law rings what is true to your name. Some disappointed results of the amendments must be eliminated or revised in short time, so that the Civil Code can add attributes to its daily use and more convenient access to it not only for lawyers but for all citizens. It can be also wise and sagacious to show perseverance until the time comes, when the jurisprudence and the legal practice is to be mature enough to revise the articles.
Abstract
Korean Civil Act has experienced, especially in the field of family law and inheritance, more than 10 serial amendments also in Naughties: many articles are deleted, revised or inserted, if proven to be needed. Even though the meaning of amendment is to reform or upgrade existing state of things, not to make a change for the worse, every now and then its consequences emerge to be undesirable. In other words, some recent amendments could not testify to his capability for work sufficiently linguistically and in the substance: for instance, newly revised articles on engagements, articles with an idiomatic construction 「That the same shall not apply where [or when]…」 and so on. The institutional change should make a profit and at the same time make the institution expansive and growing, but it is neither noticeable nor phenomenal from all angles of the amendment of law. The amendment of law rings what is true to your name. Some disappointed results of the amendments must be eliminated or revised in short time, so that the Civil Code can add attributes to its daily use and more convenient access to it not only for lawyers but for all citizens. It can be also wise and sagacious to show perseverance until the time comes, when the jurisprudence and the legal practice is to be mature enough to revise the articles.
참고문헌 (20)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (1999)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2000)
- 국회 법제실, "2011 법제실무" (2011)
- 김주수, (2016)
- 김형배, (2001)
- 김형배, "채권총론" (1998)
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013)
- 박인환, "성년후견제도 시행 4년의 평가와 과제", 법조, 66(2), pp.5~75 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 법무부, "제3기 가족법개정특별분과위원회 회의록 2011", ~ (2011)
- 법무부, "알기 쉬운 민법 개정을 위한 민법 개정 공청회", ~ (2015)
- 서희석, "일본 민법(채권법) 개정조문 시역(試譯)", 민사법학, 79, pp.123~245 (2017), 한국민사법학회
- 신동환, "혼인적령에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 23(3), pp.205~221 (2016), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2013)
- 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2015)
- 윤진수, "주해친족법 제1권, 제2권" (2015)
- 윤진수, "2013년 개정민법해설" (2013)
- 이경희, "가족법" (2013), 法元社
- 이진기, "개정민법 규정으로 본 성년후견제도의 입법적 검토와 비판", 가족법연구, 26(2), pp.85~120 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 이화숙, "2005년 개정가족법 해설 및 평가" (2005)
