양육비 감액과 자의 복리 ―대법원 2019. 1. 13.자 2018스566 결정―
Reduction of Child Support and Best Interests of the Child
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Supreme Court has made an important ruling on the child support modification case where an obligor requests reduction of child support. This ruling differs from the precedents in that the Supreme Court presented legal principle on whether it is possible to reduce child support due to the decrease of the obligor’s income once child support has been ordered by the court. In this article, the writer examines the changes in the regulation regarding modification of child support and considers in what cases and under what criteria the modification in child support should be allowed. The Supreme Court does not say that modification in child support is allowed only when there are substantial changes in circumstances. However the reduction in child support should be limited to being allowed only when there are special changes in circumstances, while the increase in child support can be widely accepted. Whether there are any special circumstances in which child support changes are permitted should be judged based on the best interests of the child.
Abstract
The Supreme Court has made an important ruling on the child support modification case where an obligor requests reduction of child support. This ruling differs from the precedents in that the Supreme Court presented legal principle on whether it is possible to reduce child support due to the decrease of the obligor’s income once child support has been ordered by the court. In this article, the writer examines the changes in the regulation regarding modification of child support and considers in what cases and under what criteria the modification in child support should be allowed. The Supreme Court does not say that modification in child support is allowed only when there are substantial changes in circumstances. However the reduction in child support should be limited to being allowed only when there are special changes in circumstances, while the increase in child support can be widely accepted. Whether there are any special circumstances in which child support changes are permitted should be judged based on the best interests of the child.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김주수, "주석 친족법(II)" (1998), 한국사법행정학회
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2018), 법문사
- 윤진수, "주해친족법" (2015), 박영사
- 이경희, "가족법" (2001), 법원사
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 가사" (1994)
- 서울가정법원, "2017 양육비 산정기준표 해설서", ~ (2017)
- Harris, "Family Law" (2014), Wolters Kluwer
- Katharina Boele-Woelki, "European Family Law in Action Volume III: Parental Responsibilities" (2005), Intersentia
- 권영준, "2017년 민법 판례 동향", 서울대학교 법학, 59(1), pp.421~550 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김재형, "계약의 해제⋅해지, 위험부담, 사정변경에 관한 민법개정안", 서울대학교 법학, 55(4), pp.3~63 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김형석, "양육비청구권을 자동채권으로 하는 상계 ―법적 성질과 관련하여", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.237~274 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 윤진수, "美國 家庭法院의 現況과 改善 論議", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.151~204 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 2009, , ~
- 임종효, "양육비청구권에 관한 기초 이론 및 실무상 쟁점", 사법논집, 51 (2011), 법원도서관
- 전보성, "이미 성립된 양육비 협정에 따른 자녀의 양육비를 감액하는 경우 고려할 사항과 판단 기준", 대법원판례해설, (119) (2019), 법원도서관
- 최민수, "부부간 과거 부양료청구와 미성년 자녀의 과거 양육비청구", 가족법연구, 28(1), pp.61~98 (2014), 한국가족법학회