호주제도 폐지 이후의 가족생활의 변모
The Negative Family Life Aspect after the Abolition of the Head of Family System
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Head of Family System and the concerned traditional custom/rules are very important in our ordinary family life and it's affected division. Notwithstanding the system was abolished, so called, by family scholars and governmental designations, in a sense, this amendment is really a transformation of our traditional family life itself. And the repeal is concerned not only civil law but also other laws, for example, penal law and civil process law etc. In the other points, family forms and their members are not so simple or inter-counted relatives. And the future family forms can not easily be expected. For example, the parent's family, children's family, or the confused family etc. can be really exposed. Their relations can not be easy to understand, consult and fax. This article is written about a part of the problems. The main points are as followings. 1) The base of the Head of Family System. 2) The transformation of the concerned provision. 3) The abolition of head-command family system. 4) The family life fusion after this abolition. The other legal problems should be deeply thought and written as the special Article. And so on I think that Korean Family Life style may not change and in some ways the more meaningful family life forms can be found. But I think we threw away a very important family system that anyone can not restore in other society or general country.
Abstract
The Head of Family System and the concerned traditional custom/rules are very important in our ordinary family life and it's affected division. Notwithstanding the system was abolished, so called, by family scholars and governmental designations, in a sense, this amendment is really a transformation of our traditional family life itself. And the repeal is concerned not only civil law but also other laws, for example, penal law and civil process law etc. In the other points, family forms and their members are not so simple or inter-counted relatives. And the future family forms can not easily be expected. For example, the parent's family, children's family, or the confused family etc. can be really exposed. Their relations can not be easy to understand, consult and fax. This article is written about a part of the problems. The main points are as followings. 1) The base of the Head of Family System. 2) The transformation of the concerned provision. 3) The abolition of head-command family system. 4) The family life fusion after this abolition. The other legal problems should be deeply thought and written as the special Article. And so on I think that Korean Family Life style may not change and in some ways the more meaningful family life forms can be found. But I think we threw away a very important family system that anyone can not restore in other society or general country.
참고문헌 (12)
- 奇世勳, "戶主制度에 관한 고찰, In 家族法의 諸問題" (1984), 法務部
- 民事法硏究會, "民法案意見書" (1957), 一潮閣
- 이효재, "가족과 사회" (1968), 민조사
- 李熙鳳, "韓國家族法上의 諸問題" (1976), 日新社
- 鄭東鎬, "韓國家族法에 있어서의 外國法의 繼受", 박사, pp.1979
- 鄭煥淡, "戶主와 家族’의 제도는 보존되어야 한다", 儒林春秋 (2000), 儒林春秋社
- 趙駿河, "戶主’制度는 보존되어야 한다", 儒林春秋 (2000), 儒林春秋社
- 家族法改正의 諸問題論集: 제3차 개정을 위한 이론적 배경 주제별논지 발췌재구성, "한국여성유권자연맹", ~ (1985)
- 韓琫熙, "離婚法改正의 諸問題, In 家族法의 諸問題" (1984), 法務部
- Jerome Hall, "比較法과 社會理論(Comparative law and social theory)" (1983), 高麗大學校 出版部
- Roger D. Wimmer, "法과 社會變動(Law and society in transition)" (1986), 나남
- Williamson Robert C., "Marrige and Family Relations" (1965), John Wilyand Sons, Inc
