친생추정에 관한 민법개정안
Draft Bill of the Civil Code on the Presumption of Paternity
0
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Article 844 Para. 2 prescribes that a child born within three hundred days from the day of the dissolution of marriage is presumed as the child of mother's former husband. The decision of the Korean Constitutional Court on April 30, 2015 declared that this provision was incompatible with the Constitution. According to the decision, this provision is a burden for the divorcing partners to form new families, and an obstacle for the biological father to recover the true blood ties, so it interferes unduly the personality right and fundamental rights on the marriage and family life of the mother. As a result of this decision, the Korean Ministry of Justice formed a committee for the revision of relevant law. The committee proposed a draft bill on the presumption of paternity. And the draft is now in the notice of legislation process by the Ministry of Justice. There are 2 important changes in the draft. One is the introduction of the recognition of paternity by the biological father with the judicial permission. Another is the denial of the paternity with the judicial permission. Formerly, the judgment of the court was indispensible for the denial of paternity. In contrast, the draft proposes more convenient processes of the judicial permission.
Abstract
Article 844 Para. 2 prescribes that a child born within three hundred days from the day of the dissolution of marriage is presumed as the child of mother's former husband. The decision of the Korean Constitutional Court on April 30, 2015 declared that this provision was incompatible with the Constitution. According to the decision, this provision is a burden for the divorcing partners to form new families, and an obstacle for the biological father to recover the true blood ties, so it interferes unduly the personality right and fundamental rights on the marriage and family life of the mother. As a result of this decision, the Korean Ministry of Justice formed a committee for the revision of relevant law. The committee proposed a draft bill on the presumption of paternity. And the draft is now in the notice of legislation process by the Ministry of Justice. There are 2 important changes in the draft. One is the introduction of the recognition of paternity by the biological father with the judicial permission. Another is the denial of the paternity with the judicial permission. Formerly, the judgment of the court was indispensible for the denial of paternity. In contrast, the draft proposes more convenient processes of the judicial permission.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2016)
- 김주수, "주석민법 친족(3)" (2016)
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013)
- 親生子推定條項의 問題點 및 改正方向, "전경근", 법무부, ~ (2015)
- 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2016), 박영사
- 승이도, "‘혼인종료 후 300일 이내에 출생한 子’의 친생추정에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 29(1), pp.265~294 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 승이도, "헌법재판소결정해설집(2015년)" (2016), 헌법재판소
- 安釦煥, "사법논집 제38집" (2004)
- 윤진수, "婚姻 成立에 관한 民法의 改正方向", 民法論攷, 4 (2009)
- 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" (2016)
- 정구태, "친생추정의 한계 및 친생부인의 소의 원고적격 - 대법원 2012. 10. 11. 선고 2012므1892 판결 및 대법원 2014. 12. 11. 선고 2013므4591 판결 -", 법학연구, 26(1), pp.113~146 (2015), 법학연구소
- 정구태, "2015년 親子法 관련 주요 판례 회고", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.3~39 (2016), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 권재문, "주해친족법Ⅰ" (2015)
- 현소혜, "친생자 추정과 가족관계등록절차의 개선방안", 법학논고, (49), pp.263~296 (2015), 법학연구원
- 현소혜, "친생자 추정: 헌법불합치결정에 따른 개정방안", 성균관법학, 27(4), pp.63~92 (2015), 법학연구원
- 홍남희, "과학적 증거가 있는 경우 민법 제844조의 친생추정에 대한 소고(小考) - 우리나라와 일본의 판례를 중심으로 -", 아주법학, 9(3), pp.419~451 (2015), 법학연구소
- Wellenhofer, "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB", pp.2012
- 윤진수, "子女의 生父에 의한 親生否認에 관한 比較法的 考察", 가족법연구, 20(1), pp.1~30 (2006), 한국가족법학회