부모 외의 자의 면접교섭권 ―유럽인권법원의 결정을 중심으로―
A study on non-parental visitation rights: with focus on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper we analyzed several decisions taken by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) regarding visitation between non-parents and children, in order to provide some suggestions in relation to the direction to be taken by Korean legislators in this respective field. To this end, we briefly covered the content of some relevant sources of law. We provided a general overview of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on Contact concerning Children, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and a brief explanation of the general criteria used by the ECtHR in relation to visitation rights, particularly regarding the existence of “family life”, as well as some mentions of the positive obligations, margin of appreciation, and proportionality doctrines. We subsequently covered some of the ECtHR’s decisions―namely, Manuello and Nevi v. Italy, and Bogonosovy v. Russia in relation to the visitation rights of grandparents, as well as Kopf and Liberda v. Austria and V.D. and Others v. Russia about foster families’ visitation rights―by examining the application of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights by the ECtHR in these circumstances. In the final section, with reference to the outcome of the aforementioned decisions, we sought to provide some inputs regarding what ought to be considered for the expansion of visitation rights in Korea.
Abstract
In this paper we analyzed several decisions taken by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) regarding visitation between non-parents and children, in order to provide some suggestions in relation to the direction to be taken by Korean legislators in this respective field. To this end, we briefly covered the content of some relevant sources of law. We provided a general overview of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on Contact concerning Children, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and a brief explanation of the general criteria used by the ECtHR in relation to visitation rights, particularly regarding the existence of “family life”, as well as some mentions of the positive obligations, margin of appreciation, and proportionality doctrines. We subsequently covered some of the ECtHR’s decisions―namely, Manuello and Nevi v. Italy, and Bogonosovy v. Russia in relation to the visitation rights of grandparents, as well as Kopf and Liberda v. Austria and V.D. and Others v. Russia about foster families’ visitation rights―by examining the application of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights by the ECtHR in these circumstances. In the final section, with reference to the outcome of the aforementioned decisions, we sought to provide some inputs regarding what ought to be considered for the expansion of visitation rights in Korea.
참고문헌 (38)
- 곽민희, "프랑스법상 조부모의 방문권(droit de visite)", 가족법연구, 27(3), pp.177~208 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 김대순, "유럽인권재판소의 “판단의 재량” 독트린:법의 지배에 대한 위협인가?", 국제법학회논총, 58(2), pp.11~43 (2013), 대한국제법학회
- 김수정, "자녀의 최선의 이익과 면접교섭권", 가족법연구, 19(1), pp.309~347 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2018), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
- 서종희, "면접교섭권자의 범위확대를 위한 해석과 그 한계", 이혼과 자녀의 보호(한국가족법학회·사법정책연구원 공동학술대회) (2020)
- 안문희, "프랑스민법상의 면접교섭권", 가족법연구, 33(1), pp.209~232 (2019), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 이준일, "이산가족의 ‘가족에 관한 권리’", 헌법논총, 25, pp.289~326 (2014), 헌법재판소
- 이현재, "의붓부모의 방문권과 당사자 적격―미국을 중심으로", 민사법연구, 12(1) (2004), 대한민사법학회
- 전정환, "유럽인권조약상의 사생활의 보호", 원광법학, 30(2), pp.31~58 (2014), 법학연구소
- 집회 및 시위의 권리 보장과 공공질서의 조화를 위한 형사정책 연구, "전현욱", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2016)
- 조원희, "조부모의 면접교섭권과 아동의 최상의 이익", 사회복지연구, 49(1), pp.85~107 (2018), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
- 최민수, "독일법상 조부모 이외의 제3자의 면접교섭권에 관한 법적 고찰 -면접교섭권자의 범위에 관한 독일민법과 비교를 중심으로-", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 22(1), pp.221~275 (2018), 민사법의 이론과 실무학회[DOI]
- 현소혜, "조부모와 계부모 기타 친족의 면접교섭권: 해석론과 입법론", 가족법연구, 29(2), pp.1~34 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 통계청, "2018년 혼인·이혼 통계(2019. 3)", ~ (2019)
- 통계청, "2015~2045 장래가구추계(2017. 5)", ~ (2017)
- Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, "The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR" (2002), Intersentia
- Boele-Woelki, Katharina, "European Family Law in Action, Volume III: Parental Responsibilities" (2005), Intersentia
- CEDH, "Droits parentaux", Conseil de l’Europe, déc. 2019, ~ (2019)
- CEDH, "Guide sur l’article 8 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale", Conseil de l’Europe, ~ (2019)
- Choudhry, Shazia, "European Human Rights and Family Law" (2010), Hart Publishing
- Conseil de l’Europe, "Convention sur les relations personnelles concernant les enfants" (2008), Éditions du Conseil de l’Europe
- Eekelaar, John, "The Role of the Best Interests Principle in Decisions Affecting Children and Decisions about Children", International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(1) (2015)
- Eudes, Marina, "La convention sur les droits de l’enfant, texte emblématique reconnaissant l’intérêt de l’enfant… et passant sous silence les droits des femmes ?", La Revue des droits de l’homme, 3 (2020)
- "Le droit du père à conserver des liens avec ses enfants, selon la CEDH" (2019)[URL]
- Kiestra, Louwrens R., "The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on Private International Law" (2014), Springer
- Kilkelly, Ursula, "Protecting Children’s Rights Under the ECHR: The Role of Positive Obligations", NILQ, 61(3) (2010)
- Kilkelly, Ursula, "The right to respect for private and family life: A guide to theimplementation of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, Human rights handbooks, No. 1", Council of Europe, ~ (2001)
- Letsas, George, "A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Mowbray, Alastair, "Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights" (2007), Oxford University Press
- National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, "Uniform Nonparent Custody and Visitation Act , approved and recommended for enactment in all States at its Annual Conference meeting in its 127th year, Louisville, Kentucky, July 20-July 26, 2018", ~ (2018)
- O’Donnell, Thomas A., "The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human rights", Human Rights Quarterly, 4(4) (1982), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Rivers, Julian, "Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review", Cambridge Law Journal, 65(1) (2006)
- Sutherland, Elaine E., "Routledge Handbook of International Family Law, Routledge Handbooks" (2019), Routledge
- Todorova, Velina, "Common Core and Better Law in European Family Law" (2005), Antwerp-Oxford
- United Nations, "Convention on the Rights of the Child, Committee on the Rights on the Children, General comment No.14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art.3, para.1) , adopted by the Committee at its 62nd session, January 14-1 February 2013", ~ (2013)
- "The protection of foster parents right to family and the best interests of the child" (2019)[URL]
- White, Robin, "White, & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights" (2010), Oxford University Press