본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

프랑스법상 익명출산제도에 대한 재고찰

Anonymous Childbirth under French Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Birth registration is a basic and essential element to receive legal protection and public services such as education, health care, and social security as a member of society. Birth notification system should be introduced that allows the birth of a child to be notified at the facility (ex: hospital) where the child was born, regardless of nationality. However, the birth notification system requires consideration for parents who are reluctant to reveal their identity as the fact of birth is notified or reported regardless of the parents’ will. In short, in order to protect a child's basic rights (right to life, etc.) that can be exercised by exposure of identity, anonymous childbirth under French law should be introduced along with the birth notification system. In French, The consecration of the ‘Mater semper certa rule’ does not put an end under the possibility for the mother to request at the time of giving birth that “the secret of her admission and of her identity be maintained” (art. 326). Hence, her name will not be indicated on the birth certificate, and in consequence, filiation will not be established in relations to her. The impossibility of establishing filiation later on in case the secret would be revealed, is guaranteed since the law of January 8th 1993 by a flat refusal against all actions relating to research of natural maternity(art. 325, art. 341-1 anc.). Meanwhile, to ensure better balance of the interests of those involved, the legislator has intervened through the law of January 22nd 2002. Article L.222-6 of the Social Action and Family Code ends to ensure that a woman who gives birth under X is fully aware of the importance and the judicial consequences of her decision. She is reminded “the importance for each person to know her origins and her history.” In consequence, she is invited to leave “if she agrees to it, information about her health and that of the father, the origins of the child and the circumstances of the birth as well as, in a sealed envelope, her identity.” She is informed that at any time she can leave her identity, in a sealed envelope or complete the information she has provided at the time of birth. The mother is informed as well of the possibility she has at any time to lift the secrecy of her identity. It is hoped that this paper will be helpful in introducing an anonymous birth system in the future.

Abstract

Birth registration is a basic and essential element to receive legal protection and public services such as education, health care, and social security as a member of society. Birth notification system should be introduced that allows the birth of a child to be notified at the facility (ex: hospital) where the child was born, regardless of nationality. However, the birth notification system requires consideration for parents who are reluctant to reveal their identity as the fact of birth is notified or reported regardless of the parents’ will. In short, in order to protect a child's basic rights (right to life, etc.) that can be exercised by exposure of identity, anonymous childbirth under French law should be introduced along with the birth notification system. In French, The consecration of the ‘Mater semper certa rule’ does not put an end under the possibility for the mother to request at the time of giving birth that “the secret of her admission and of her identity be maintained” (art. 326). Hence, her name will not be indicated on the birth certificate, and in consequence, filiation will not be established in relations to her. The impossibility of establishing filiation later on in case the secret would be revealed, is guaranteed since the law of January 8th 1993 by a flat refusal against all actions relating to research of natural maternity(art. 325, art. 341-1 anc.). Meanwhile, to ensure better balance of the interests of those involved, the legislator has intervened through the law of January 22nd 2002. Article L.222-6 of the Social Action and Family Code ends to ensure that a woman who gives birth under X is fully aware of the importance and the judicial consequences of her decision. She is reminded “the importance for each person to know her origins and her history.” In consequence, she is invited to leave “if she agrees to it, information about her health and that of the father, the origins of the child and the circumstances of the birth as well as, in a sealed envelope, her identity.” She is informed that at any time she can leave her identity, in a sealed envelope or complete the information she has provided at the time of birth. The mother is informed as well of the possibility she has at any time to lift the secrecy of her identity. It is hoped that this paper will be helpful in introducing an anonymous birth system in the future.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 권재문, "익명출산에서 익명상담으로", 동북아법연구, 8(3), pp.475~498 (2015), 동북아법연구소
  2. 권재문, "입양특례법 재개정론에 대한 비판적 고찰 ― 베이비박스와 익명출산 ―", 법학연구, 22(1), pp.59~85 (2014), 법학연구소
  3. 김상용, "베이비박스와 익명의 출산- 가족관계등록법의 개정과 관련하여 -", 법학연구, 54(4), pp.315~341 (2013), 법학연구소
  4. 서종희, "미등록 외국인 아동의 출생 등록될 권리 보장 : 출생통보제 도입 및 비밀출산(신뢰출산)제도 도입을 중심으로", 법과사회, (70), pp.65~111 (2022), 법과사회이론학회
  5. 서종희, "출생신고 및 등록절차에 관한 비교법적 연구―국내입법방향에 대한 소고", 연세법학, (27) (2016)
  6. 서종희, "익명출산제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰- 베이비박스를 둘러싼 논의를 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 27(2), pp.89~137 (2014), 법학연구소[DOI]
  7. 서종희, "익명출산으로 태어난 자에 대한 프랑스의 입양절차", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.75~98 (2014), 한국가족법학회
  8. 송효진, "출생신고제도의 개선방안 —의료기관 연계 출생통보제도의 도입을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 31(2), pp.169~198 (2017), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
  9. 신동현, "독일에서의 베이비박스와 비밀출산법제", 비교사법, 22(4), pp.1865~1890 (2015), 한국사법학회[DOI]
  10. 신옥주, "독일의 입법례를 중심으로 살펴본 제한적 익명출산제도의 도입 필요성에 관한 연구", 한양법학, 25(4), pp.331~367 (2014), 한양법학회
  11. 안경희, "독일법상 신뢰출산제도에 관한 소고", 이화젠더법학, 9(1), pp.1~42 (2017), 젠더법학연구소[DOI]
  12. 안문희, "프랑스법의 익명출산제도 -2003년 2월 13일 유럽인권법원판결(ODIÈVRE c. FRANCE)과 관련하여-", 중앙법학, 15(4), pp.213~234 (2013), 중앙법학회[DOI]
  13. 이준일, "미등록 이주 아동의 인권", 인권법평론, (28), pp.201~232 (2022), 공익인권법센터
  14. 이지은, "프랑스 비밀출산제도(l'accouchement secret)의 현황", 유럽연구, 33(1), pp.171~202 (2015), 한국유럽학회[DOI]
  15. 이진혜, "아동·청소년의 권리에 관한 연구" (2020), 경인문화사
  16. 전병주, "혼인 외 출생자로서 외국인 모(母)에서 태어난 아 동의 출생 등록될 권리에 관한 연구 : 대법원 2020. 6. 8.자 2020스575 결정 중심으로", GRI연구논총, 23(2), pp.169~192 (2021), 재단법인 경기연구원
  17. 한명진, "독일법상 신뢰출산제도의 시행과 평가에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 43(1), pp.77~109 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
  18. 현소혜, "외국인 아동을 위한 보편적 출생등록제의 도입필요성과 도입방안", 가족법연구, 34(2), pp.141~182 (2020), 한국가족법학회
  19. ARDEEFF, "Pour le Conseil national pour l'accès aux origines personnelles et le maintien de l'accouchement sous X, D", ~ (2001)
  20. COURBE, "Droit de la famille" (2017), Sirey
  21. DGCS, "Etude portant sur l'évaluation de différents aspects de la loi n°2002-93 du 22janvier 2002 relative à l'accès aux origines des personnes adoptées et pupilles de l'Etat" (2017)
  22. HAUSER, "Le crépuscule de la loi en droit des personnes et de la famille, in Des liens et des droits" (2015), Dalloz
  23. Granet-Lambrechts, "J-Cl. Civil Code, Art. 318 à 324, Fasc. unique : Filiation. Actions relatives à la filiation. Dispositions générales", ~ (2017)
  24. Granet-Lambrechts, "J-Cl. Civil Code, Art. 325, 326 et 328, Fasc. unique : Actions relatives à la filiation", ~ (2014)
  25. MALAURIE, "Droit de la famille, coll. Droit civil", LGDJ, Lextenso (2018)
  26. Observatoire National de la Protection de l’Enfance(ONPE), "Enfants en (risque de)danger, enfants protégés : quelles données chiffrées?" (2016)
  27. Observatoire National de la Protection de l’Enfance(ONPE), "La Situation des Pupilles de l’Etat: Enquete au 31 decembre 2016" (2018)
  28. TERRÉ, "Droit civil. La famille, coll. Précis" (2018), Dalloz
  29. Filiation, origines, parentalité, "THÉRY", ~ (2014)
  30. Wiesner-Berg, "Anonyme Kindesabgabe in Deutschland und der Schweiz:Rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung von "Babyklappe", "anonymer Geburt" und "anonymer Übergabe"" (2009)
  31. Bonnet, "l'accouchement sous X", Journal de Pédiatrie et de Puériculture, 6, pp.348~ (1999)
  32. Freeman, "Who and what is a mother? Maternity, responsibility and liberty", Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1), pp.153~ (2012)
  33. Fortin, "Children’s Right to Know Their Origins―Too Far, Too Fast?", Child and Family Law Quarterly, 21(3), pp.336~ (2011)
  34. Lefaucheur, "The French “tradition” of anonymous birth: the lines of argument", International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 18(3), pp.319~ (2004)
  35. Villeneuve-Gokalp, "Women who Give Birth “Secretly” in France, 2007-2009", Population, 66(1), pp.131~ (2011)
  36. "Le Registre Françis du Social et Méico-Social"[URL]
  37. "Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 23 mai 2001, RAPPORT INFORMATION"[URL]
  38. "Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique(CCNE)"[URL]
  39. "The French Social Security System I - Health, maternity, paternity, disability, and death"[URL]
  40. "Rapport d’activité 2017" (2018)[URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)