Case Licensing of the ECMed Nominal by a Light Verb
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Abstract Case Licensing of the ECMed Nominal by a Light Verb Lee, Doo-Won (Chungju National University) Structural Case (i.e., inherent Case) is associated with theta-positions, whereas structural Case is not (Chomsky 1981, 1986, Bošković 1997, 2002, Woolford 2006). If inherent Case (which Bošković assumes is assigned to elements in situ) is available only to nominals that the Case-assigning verb θ-marks, as is standardly assumed, inherent Case is excluded from ECM constructions. The inherent Case option of the ECMed nominal is ruled out due to the association with θ-licensing, the ECMed nominal not being θ-marked by its Case licensor: the only Case available to objects that undergo ECM, then is structural. In this paper, following Bošković (1997, 2002), I argue that structural Case must be checked by movement. In this respect, the ECMed nominal must move to the matrix non-thematic position (i.e., here, the outer spec of the matrix v*) in order to have its structural Case checked against v*: that is, the Korean ECMed nominal receives its structural Case in its surface position. From that surface A-position, the ECMed nominal can be passivized to the matrix [Spec, TP]. Unlike in English, the embedded clause of ECM constructions in Korean has an overt tense morpheme and an overt complementizer, which indicates that it is of a CP structure. If we assume that the ECMed nominal moves from the embedded subject position, it must raise across the embedded [Spec, CP] by A-movement. This violates locality on A-movement.
참고문헌 (36)
- Aarts, B, "English Syntax and Argumentation" (2001), Hampshire, England: Palgrave
- Baek, J, "Verb Raising and A", A-bar Distinction: Evidence from Exceptional Case Marking, 1997, ~[DOI]
- Bo kovi ,, "The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach" (1997), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Bo kovi ,, "A-Movement and the EPP", 5, pp.167~216 (2002)
- Bo kovi, "On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree", in press
- Bowers, "The Syntax of Predication", pp.591~656 (1993)
- Bruening, B, "Syntax at the Edge Cross-Clausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaquoddy" (2001), Doctoral Dissertation, MIT
- In S, "Conditions on Transformations A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973)
- "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981)
- Origin, "Knowledge of Language" (1986)
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation By Phase", pp.1~52 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "On Phases. Ms" (2005), MIT.
- In J, "The Theory of Principles and Parameters An International Handbook of Contemporary Research" (1993), Vennemann
- Holmberg, "University of Stockholm" (1986)
- Hong, "Subject-to-Object Raising in Korean", pp.215~225 (1990)
- Hong, K.-S, "Subject-to-Object Raising Construction in English and Korean", 33(3), pp.409~434 (1997)
- Jung, Y.-J, "Multiple Case Marking and Its PF Interpretation", 26, pp.239~268 (2001)
- In J, "Principles of Particle Constructions", pp.101~40 (1984)
- Kim, C, "Raising to Object in Korean" (2005), Ms. University of Delaware
- Lasnik, H, "A note on pseudogapping", 27, pp.143~163 (1995), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
- Lasnik, H, "Chains of arguments.", pp.189~215 (1999), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- and Saito, "On the Subject of Infinitives Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 27 University of Chicago", pp.324~43 (1991)
- Lee, D.-W, "Nun-marked Nominals ECMed from the Clause Edge Position", 11, pp.491~500 (2006), Seoul: Thaehaksa
- Levin, "Main Verb Ellipsis in Spoken English [Published in 1986 by Garland" (1979), Ohio State University
- L pez, L, "On the (Non)complementarity of -Theory and Checking Theory", 32(n), pp.694~716 (2001)
- Postal, "One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Radford, A, "Minimalist Syntax - Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, "Long-distance scrambling in Japanese Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1", pp.69~118 (1992)
- Woolford, E, "Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure", 37, pp.111~130 (2006)
- Yoon, H.-J, "ECM in Korean", 37, pp.27~58 (2004)
- Yoon, "Some Queries Concerning the Syntax of Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics II", pp.138~162 (1987)
- Yoon, J, "Ambiguity of Government and the Chain Condition", 14, pp.105~162 (1996)
- Yoon, J, "Raising Specifiers: A Macroparametric Account of Subject-to-Object Raising in Some Altaic Languages" (2004), Ms. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champain
- Yoon, "ECM and Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III", pp.369~381 (1989)
- Yoon, "The Syntax of A-Chains A Typological Study of ECM and Scrambling" (1991), Cornell University