본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

요약쓰기과제를 통한 읽기능력향상

Effects of Summary Writing on Reading Comprehension

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Summary writing in reading classes has been used as a post-reading activity in that L2 learners can write from and about written texts. The purpose of the study was to investigate how much summary writing influenced word learning, including both familiar and unfamiliar ones, and reading comprehension. To complete the study, 34 college students who were taking a reading comprehension course had been asked to submit ten summary writings, as an assignment, after completing each unit for 15 weeks. In class, some reading strategies, especially recognizing and using text structure, were focused on for the students to be a strategic reader. The results of the study showed summary writing had a significant effect on recognition of familiar and unfamiliar words and reading comprehension, but not on final exam. Summary writing caused them to activate and use words and structures, not only the ones which have been exposed but also never exposed to them. The study suggests an intriguing possibility that attempts to write in L2 have positive effects on key components contributing to L2 reading comprehension regardless of how well writing is.

Abstract

Summary writing in reading classes has been used as a post-reading activity in that L2 learners can write from and about written texts. The purpose of the study was to investigate how much summary writing influenced word learning, including both familiar and unfamiliar ones, and reading comprehension. To complete the study, 34 college students who were taking a reading comprehension course had been asked to submit ten summary writings, as an assignment, after completing each unit for 15 weeks. In class, some reading strategies, especially recognizing and using text structure, were focused on for the students to be a strategic reader. The results of the study showed summary writing had a significant effect on recognition of familiar and unfamiliar words and reading comprehension, but not on final exam. Summary writing caused them to activate and use words and structures, not only the ones which have been exposed but also never exposed to them. The study suggests an intriguing possibility that attempts to write in L2 have positive effects on key components contributing to L2 reading comprehension regardless of how well writing is.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 권소라, "요약하기와 관점 바꾸어 글쓰기 활동이 고등학생의 영어 읽기와 쓰기 능력 및 학습 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2007
  2. 김은주, "요약하기 과업이 중학교 영어학습자의 읽기능력에 미치는 영향", Foreign Language Education, 8(2), pp.153~172 (2001)
  3. 송미정, "EFL 상황에서 영어 읽기와 쓰기의 관계에 대한 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2003
  4. 이종희, "독해일지 작성 활동이 고등학생의 영어 읽기 쓰기 능력 및 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향", Foreign Languages Education, 20(1), pp.175~202 (2013), 한국외국어교육학회
  5. 이지현, "한국의 대학 신입생의 영어 요약문 작성 능력 분석", 영어교육, 66(2), pp.307~333 (2011), 한국영어교육학회
  6. 정행, "요약활동을 통한 대학생 영어 읽기 수업 효과", 영어영문학21, 25(4), pp.265~287 (2012), 21세기영어영문학회
  7. 최연희, "영어읽기교육론 원리와적용" (2009), 한국문화사
  8. Block, E., "The comprehension strategies of second language readers", TESOL Quarterly, 20, pp.463~494 (1986)
  9. Brinton, D. M., "Content-Based second language instruction" (1989), Newbury House
  10. Brown, A. L., "Macrorules for summarizing texts : The development of expertise", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.1~14 (1983)
  11. Brown, A. L., "The development of plans for summarizing texts", Child Development, 54, pp.968~979 (1983)
  12. Byrne, "Teaching writing skills" (1988), Longman
  13. Campbell, C., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.211~230 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  14. Carrell, P. L., "The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers", TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), pp.441~469 (1984)
  15. Carrell, P. L, "Metacognition and EFL", ESL reading, 1998, pp.26, 97~112
  16. Carson, J., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.88~107 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  17. Carson, J., "Reading and writing relationship in first and second language", TESOL Quarterly, 24, pp.245~266 (1990)
  18. Clarke, M. A., "The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading-or when language competence interferes with reading performance", The Modern Language Journal, 64, pp.203~209 (1980)
  19. Cordero-Ponce, W., "Summarization instruction; Effects on foreign language comprehension and summarization and summarization of expository texts", Reading Research and Instruction, 39(4), pp.329~350 (2000)
  20. Cummins, J., "Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children", Review of Educational Research, 49, pp.222~251 (1979)
  21. Dubin, Eskey, "Teaching second language reading for academic purpose" (1986), Addison-Wesley
  22. Ferris, D., "Teaching ESL composition : Purpose, process, and practice" (1998), Lawrence Erlbarum
  23. Fisher, D., "Checking for understanding : Formative assessment techniques for your classroom" (2007), ASCD
  24. Grabe, W., "Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.242~262 (2003), CUP
  25. Grabe, W., "Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.187~203 (2001), Heinle & Heinle
  26. Grabe, W., "Teaching and researching reading" (2002), Longman Pearson Education
  27. Harmer, "The practice of English language teaching" (2007), Pearson
  28. Hidi, S., "Producing written summaries : Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction", Review of Educational Research, 56(4), pp.473~493 (1986)
  29. Hudson, T., "Teaching second language reading" (2007), Oxford University Press
  30. Joh, J. S., "Towards innovative reading instruction in English classroom : A study of middle school students", English Teaching, 56(1), pp.3~29 (2001)
  31. Johns, A., "Reading in the composition classroom", pp.274~289 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  32. Johnson, N., "Children’s language", pp.315~483 (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum
  33. Keck., "The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.261~278 (2006)
  34. Kintsch, W., "Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill", Cognition and Instruction, 7(3), pp.161~195 (1990)
  35. Kintsch, W., "Toward a model of text comprehension and procession", Psychological Review, 85, pp.363~394 (1978)
  36. Kroll, B., "Teaching English as a second or foreign language", pp.1991, Newbury House
  37. Meyer, B. J, F., "Effects of discourse type on recall", American Education Research Journal, 21(1), pp.121~143 (1984)
  38. Nuttall, C., "Teaching reading skills in a foreign language" (1996), Heinemann
  39. Paris, Lipson, "Becoming a strategic reader", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, pp.1239~1252 (1983)
  40. Reid, J., "Reading in the composition class: Second language perspectives", pp.33~60 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  41. Schoonen, R., "Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language comprehsneion : An empirical study among Dutch students in grade 6, 8 and 10", Language Learning, 48, pp.71~106 (1998)
  42. Shim, Jaewoo, "Exploring Reading and Writing Connection: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach", 영어교육, 59(2), pp.59~74 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  43. Spack, R., "Reading in the composition class: Second language perspectives", pp.186~194 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  44. Swain, "The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren’t enough", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, pp.150~164 (1993)
  45. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society. Cambridge" (1978), Harvard University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)