본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정치심리학에서 본 『줄리어스 시저』

Political Psychology in Julius Caesar

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper aims to analyze Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar in terms of political psychology. Political psychology has contributed to our understanding of the political behavior of both political leaders and ordinary people. This play is a political tragedy that deals with the assassination of Julius Caesar by Brutus and his party. Why did Brutus kill Julius Caesar who thinks that Brutus is his favorite? What caused Brutus to conspire with Cassius against Caesar? Was it his idealistic and moral beliefs and character or the political situation with which he was confronted? The theories of political psychology provides us with the available clue to the question. Even though he decided to kill Caesar not for the personal cause but the general good of Rome, he betrays his inner desire to be powerful. Brutus and his party intended to keep a republican form of government in Rome by getting rid of Caesar. However, they did succeed temporarily. The most decisive reasons why the conspiracy failed in the end were not only Brutus’s personality but also his mistake to cope with the political situation. When he took the role of the leader he made a decisive blunder that he permitted Antony to speak the funeral address in front of the plebeians. Since Antony has a good grasp of the attribute of commons he manipulates them into mutinying against Brutus’ party with his political rhetoric. Brutus party lost the support of the commons. As a result the political situation was reversed, so Brutus killed himself. By using concepts of political psychology I attempted to show how and why Brutus’s political behavior has been done. Both his idealistic personality and the political situation account for his political action which led to his tragedy.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar in terms of political psychology. Political psychology has contributed to our understanding of the political behavior of both political leaders and ordinary people. This play is a political tragedy that deals with the assassination of Julius Caesar by Brutus and his party. Why did Brutus kill Julius Caesar who thinks that Brutus is his favorite? What caused Brutus to conspire with Cassius against Caesar? Was it his idealistic and moral beliefs and character or the political situation with which he was confronted? The theories of political psychology provides us with the available clue to the question. Even though he decided to kill Caesar not for the personal cause but the general good of Rome, he betrays his inner desire to be powerful. Brutus and his party intended to keep a republican form of government in Rome by getting rid of Caesar. However, they did succeed temporarily. The most decisive reasons why the conspiracy failed in the end were not only Brutus’s personality but also his mistake to cope with the political situation. When he took the role of the leader he made a decisive blunder that he permitted Antony to speak the funeral address in front of the plebeians. Since Antony has a good grasp of the attribute of commons he manipulates them into mutinying against Brutus’ party with his political rhetoric. Brutus party lost the support of the commons. As a result the political situation was reversed, so Brutus killed himself. By using concepts of political psychology I attempted to show how and why Brutus’s political behavior has been done. Both his idealistic personality and the political situation account for his political action which led to his tragedy.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김광억, "세상읽기와 세상 만들기 : 사회과학의 이해" (2009), 서울대학교 출판부
  2. 니콜로 마키아벨리, "로마사 논고" (2011), 한길사
  3. 데이비드 패트릭 호튼, "정치심리학" (2013), 성균관대학교 출판부
  4. 박우수, "수사학과 Julius Caesar", Shakespeare Review, 26, pp.117~142 (1995)
  5. 박효춘, "『줄리어스 시저』의 이상주의와 현실주의 정치 대립을 통해 본 평민들의 꿈", Shakespeare Review, 47(2), pp.273~312 (2011), 한국셰익스피어학회
  6. 샤를 드 몽테스키외, "로마의 성공, 로마제국의 실패" (2013), 사이
  7. 안경환, "법, 셰익스피어를 입다" (2012), 서울대출판문화원
  8. 이노경, "실패한 비극작가, 브루터스-『줄리어스 시저』에서의 ‘시대착오’ 의미 연구", Shakespeare Review, 42(1), pp.23~38 (2006), 한국셰익스피어학회
  9. 이정희, "마음의 정치 : 현대 정치심리학의 이해" (2005), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
  10. 이행수, "『줄리어스 시저』: 힘에의 의지", Shakespeare Review, 43(2), pp.329~348 (2007), 한국셰익스피어학회
  11. 앤런 불룸, "셰익스피어의 정치철학" (1983), 집문당
  12. Danson, Lawrence, "Modern Critical Interpretations No. 8: William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar" (1988), Chelsea House
  13. Evans, Bertrand, "Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice" (1979), Oxford UP
  14. Gless, Darryl J, "Shakespeare Left and Right" (1991), Routledge
  15. Knights, L. C., "Julius Caesar" (1979), Macmillan Press
  16. MacCallum, M. W, "Shakespeare Roman Plays" (1967), MacMillan
  17. Nuttall, A. D, "Shakespeare The Thinker" (2007), Yale UP
  18. Palmer, John, "Political Characters of Shakespeare" (1948), Macmillan
  19. Proser, Matthew, "The Heroic Image in Five Shakespearean Tragedies" (1978), Gordian Press
  20. Sears, David O, "Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology" (2003), Oxford UP
  21. Shakespeare, William., "Dorsch" (1982), Methuen
  22. Shakespeare, William, "The New Cambridge Shakespeare" (1988), Cambridge UP
  23. Soellner, Rolf, "Shakespeare’s Patterns of Self-Knowledge" (1972), Ohio State UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)