Control Structure under Survive-minimalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze control sentences under Survive-minimalism, following Stroik and Putnam (2013). Unlike the standard Minimalism, LEX, NUM, and CS are located within the CI and SM performance system in Survive-minimalism. It is also assumed that only Copy operation is used to build a syntactic structure in Survive-minimalism instead of External and Internal Merge. In addition, the derivation begins and proceeds by a Feature Matrix, which is a set of hierarchically structured features. A subject control clause is analyzed in this paper in a Survive-minimalism manner. CASE feature of the embedded subject is somewhat complicated since the subject of the control clause is not pronounced unlike canonical subjects even if it has semantic interpretation. By dividing tense-heads into three categories and assuming control infinitival tense-head has a weak CASE-selecting feature, control clause could quite successfully be analyzed under Survive-minimalism.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze control sentences under Survive-minimalism, following Stroik and Putnam (2013). Unlike the standard Minimalism, LEX, NUM, and CS are located within the CI and SM performance system in Survive-minimalism. It is also assumed that only Copy operation is used to build a syntactic structure in Survive-minimalism instead of External and Internal Merge. In addition, the derivation begins and proceeds by a Feature Matrix, which is a set of hierarchically structured features. A subject control clause is analyzed in this paper in a Survive-minimalism manner. CASE feature of the embedded subject is somewhat complicated since the subject of the control clause is not pronounced unlike canonical subjects even if it has semantic interpretation. By dividing tense-heads into three categories and assuming control infinitival tense-head has a weak CASE-selecting feature, control clause could quite successfully be analyzed under Survive-minimalism.
참고문헌 (16)
- Brody, Michael, "Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory" (1995), MIT Press
- Brody, Michael, "Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.19~41 (2002), Blackwell
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Corballis, Michael, "The evolution of human language", pp.115~123 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Hinzen, Wolfram, "InterPhases: Phase-theoretic investigations of linguistic interfaces", pp.25~47 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Understanding minimalism" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Frampton, John, "Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.90~105 (2002), Blackwell
- 김성해, "PRO vs. Equi-DP", 영어영문학연구, 52(4), pp.115~132 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 김성해, "Derivational Approach to Contraction Focusing on Wanna Contraction", 영어영문학연구, 54(4), pp.115~132 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Martin, Roger, "Null case and the distribution of PRO", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.141~166 (2001)
- Putnam, Michael, "Exploring crash-proof grammars" (2010), John Benjamins
- Putnam, Michael, "Towards a derivational syntax: Survive minimalism", pp.3~19 (2009), John Benjamins Publishing
- Putnam, Michael, "Exploring crash-proof grammars", pp.143~166 (2010), John Benjamins Publishing
- Putnam, Michael, "The structural design of language" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Stroik, Thomas, "Locality in minimalist syntax" (2009), MIT Press
- Stroik, Thomas, "Towards a derivational syntax: Survive-minimalism", pp.21~37 (2009), John Benjamins Publishing