영어 전치사 자질에 따른 음성 실현 양상의 차이
Different Phonetic Realizations According to Two Features in English Prepositions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
English prepositions are among the most difficult grammar components for Korean learners of English. Previous studies have tended to focus on types of prepositional errors, based on the semantic point of view. However, since the preposition in English has binary values as to its PRD features: predicative (PRD+) or non-predicative (PRD-), the syntactic properties of English prepositions differ by their binary values. To examine the different phonetic realizations in English prepositions, this study conducted a production experiment. We found that when the native English speakers uttered the prepositions, they produced different pitch values even for the same preposition, depending on the binary values. In contrast, since Korean speakers did not always recognize the difference between the binary values with respect to prepositions, different phonetic patterns were observed, depending on whether or not they had undergone proper education training. A control group with no education training presented phonetic realizations that differed from those of native speakers. However, a test group with training showed phonetic patterns similar to the native speakers’ patterns. The results of the experiment suggest that the teaching of prepositions according to the binary values is required in English education.
Abstract
English prepositions are among the most difficult grammar components for Korean learners of English. Previous studies have tended to focus on types of prepositional errors, based on the semantic point of view. However, since the preposition in English has binary values as to its PRD features: predicative (PRD+) or non-predicative (PRD-), the syntactic properties of English prepositions differ by their binary values. To examine the different phonetic realizations in English prepositions, this study conducted a production experiment. We found that when the native English speakers uttered the prepositions, they produced different pitch values even for the same preposition, depending on the binary values. In contrast, since Korean speakers did not always recognize the difference between the binary values with respect to prepositions, different phonetic patterns were observed, depending on whether or not they had undergone proper education training. A control group with no education training presented phonetic realizations that differed from those of native speakers. However, a test group with training showed phonetic patterns similar to the native speakers’ patterns. The results of the experiment suggest that the teaching of prepositions according to the binary values is required in English education.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김귀순, "전치사구의 생성문법적 접근" (1998), 한국문화사
- 김종복, "영어 통사 의미 구조의 이해: 제약기반 이론적 분석" (2009), 한국문화사
- 김지은, "한국인 학습자의 영어 초분절적 요소 학습의 효과: 음성학적 연구", 영어영문학연구, 58(1), pp.259~273 (2016), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 박찬규, "외국어 학습전략과 학업성취도의 관계", 영어영문학연구, 52(3), pp.253~274 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 서혜영, "성인 EFL 학습자의 전치사 사용에 관한 오류분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2006
- 신영미, "영어 전치사 학습상의 오류분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2000
- 임신영, "영어 구동사와 전치사동사의 음성학적 실현 양상", 영어영문학, 21(1), pp.319~338 (2016), 미래영어영문학회
- 조경미, "한국 고등학생들의 영어 전치사 사용에 관한 오류 분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2005
- 황정민, "한국 대학생의 영어 전치사 사용 연구", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2013
- EFL teacher’s course, "The grammar book: An ESL", pp.1983, Celce-Murcia, Marianne
- Cowan, Ron, "The teacher’s grammar of English with answers: A course book and reference guided" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Davis, Anthony R, "Linking by types in the hierarchical lexicon" (2001), CSLI Publications
- Gazdar, Gerald, "Generalized phrase structure grammar" (1985), Harvard University Press
- Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Interrogative investigations" (2000), CSLI publications
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Case theory and preposition stranding", Linguistic inquiry, 12(1), pp.55~91 (1981)
- Sag, Ivan, "Syntactic theory: A formal introduction" (1999), CSLI publications
- 유은정, "English Absolutes, Free Adjuncts, and WITH: A Constructional Analysis", 언어와 정보, 12(2), pp.49~75 (2008), 한국언어정보학회
