A Labeling Approach to Extraction out of Clausal Adjuncts
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper accounts for the ban on extraction out of adjunct clauses, by relying on labeling, especially via feature sharing. Clausal adjuncts bear distinctive properties, when compared with arguments that have been widely researched on. One of the main characteristics of clausal adjuncts is their island-hood. Especially concentrating on the adjunct condition, which dictates that a clausal adjunct forms a strong island for extraction, a feature sharing-based approach is proposed in this paper. Departing from Truswell’s (2011) semantic approach, we propose that in cases where a clausal adjunct does not form a single event with a matrix clause vP, the merger of an adjunct is left as unlabeled. In other words, the unlabeled status of the merger formed by a clausal adjunct is a culprit for imposing the adjunct condition which bans further movement out of the clausal adjunct. Regarding the exceptional exemption from the adjunct condition, extraction out of a phrasal adjunct is exceptionally allowed in certain structural environment where the phrasal adjunct (with its internal structure being vP) is merged with the corresponding matrix clause vP to form a single event via theta-identification, which successfully results in labeling of the merge.
Abstract
This paper accounts for the ban on extraction out of adjunct clauses, by relying on labeling, especially via feature sharing. Clausal adjuncts bear distinctive properties, when compared with arguments that have been widely researched on. One of the main characteristics of clausal adjuncts is their island-hood. Especially concentrating on the adjunct condition, which dictates that a clausal adjunct forms a strong island for extraction, a feature sharing-based approach is proposed in this paper. Departing from Truswell’s (2011) semantic approach, we propose that in cases where a clausal adjunct does not form a single event with a matrix clause vP, the merger of an adjunct is left as unlabeled. In other words, the unlabeled status of the merger formed by a clausal adjunct is a culprit for imposing the adjunct condition which bans further movement out of the clausal adjunct. Regarding the exceptional exemption from the adjunct condition, extraction out of a phrasal adjunct is exceptionally allowed in certain structural environment where the phrasal adjunct (with its internal structure being vP) is merged with the corresponding matrix clause vP to form a single event via theta-identification, which successfully results in labeling of the merge
참고문헌 (33)
- Bode, Stefanie, "Casting a minimalist eye on adjuncts" (2019), Routledge
- Borgonovo, Claudia, "Transparent adjuncts", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45, pp.199~224 (2000)
- Bošković, Željko, "From the complex NP constraint to everything:On deep extractions across categories", The Linguistic Review, 32, pp.603~669 (2015)
- Bošković, Željko, "Introduction", The Linguistic Review: Special Issue on Labels, 33, pp.1~16 (2016)
- Chaves, Rui P., "On the grammar of extraction and coordination", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, pp.465~512 (2012)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "On phases. Foundational issues in linguistic theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projections", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "Types of A’-dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
- Epstein, Samuel D, "Ways of structure building", pp.253~270 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Higginbotham, James, "On semantics", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.547~593 (1985)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, pp.113~139 (2009)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Adjunction, labeling, and bare phrase structure", Biolinguistics, 2, pp.57~86 (2008)
- Huang, James C.-T., "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", pp.1982
- Hunter, Tim, "Deconstructing merge and move to make room for adjunction", Syntax, 18, pp.266~319 (2015)
- Kayne, Richard, "The Antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- May, Robert, "Logical form: Its structure and derivation" (1985), MIT
- Müller, G., "On deriving CED effects from the PIC", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.35~82 (2010)
- Narita, Hiroki, "Phasing in full interpretation", pp.2011
- Nunes, Jairo, "Cyclicity and extraction domain", Syntax, 3, pp.20~43 (2000)
- Oseki, Yohei, "Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics", pp.303~312 (2015), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
- Ott, Dennis, "Local instability", pp.2011
- Speas, Margaret, "Perspectives on phrase structure, syntax and semantics, Volume 25", pp.241~257 (1991), Academic Press
- Stepanov, Arthur, "NELS 30: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society", pp.597~612 (2000), GLSA
- Stepanov, Arthur, "Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure", Syntax, 4, pp.94~125 (2001)
- Stepanov, Arthur, "The end of CED? minimalism and extraction domains", Syntax, 10, pp.80~126 (2007)
- Szabolcsi, Anna, "The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax", pp.1~51 (2017), John Wiley and Sons Inc
- Truswell, Robert, "Locality of wh-movement and the individuation of events", pp.2007
- Truswell, Robert, "Events, phrases and questions" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Uriagereka, Juan, "Working minimalism", pp.251~282 (1999), MIT Press