본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

엘리엇의 시: 기표의 좌절과 극복 -없음과 있음의 미학-

T. S. Eliot’s Poetry: Frustration and Overcoming of the Signifier -Aesthetics of Absence and Presence-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Eliot’s poetry is considered aesthetics of absence and presence. The subject in earlier poetry which lacks in the true signified lies in the chain of desire and meaningless language, so the subject goes through frustration. Understood in these terms, the subject in earlier poetry is held to be the signifier without the signified. So it remains clear that the subject in Eliot’s earlier poetry is not a fixed subject at all. Seen from theological point of view, however, Eliot’s poetic subject changes into spiritual subject, which can be a new type of the subject to cope with materialism in the age of late-capitalism. Therefore it must be said that even if the subject in earlier poetry is split, it is complete through Logos in later poetry. Phrased in these terms, this paper aims at dealing with how the subject overcomes the frustration of the signifier, finally showing that Eliot’s poetic subject certainly rejects the Cartesian self in which the subject was further in despair.

Abstract

Eliot’s poetry is considered aesthetics of absence and presence. The subject in earlier poetry which lacks in the true signified lies in the chain of desire and meaningless language, so the subject goes through frustration. Understood in these terms, the subject in earlier poetry is held to be the signifier without the signified. So it remains clear that the subject in Eliot’s earlier poetry is not a fixed subject at all. Seen from theological point of view, however, Eliot’s poetic subject changes into spiritual subject, which can be a new type of the subject to cope with materialism in the age of late-capitalism. Therefore it must be said that even if the subject in earlier poetry is split, it is complete through Logos in later poetry. Phrased in these terms, this paper aims at dealing with how the subject overcomes the frustration of the signifier, finally showing that Eliot’s poetic subject certainly rejects the Cartesian self in which the subject was further in despair.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 하이데거, 마틴, "존재와 시간" (1998), 까치
  2. Brooker, Jewel Spears, "Mastery and Escape: T. S. Eliot and the Dialectic of Modernism" (1994), Massachusetts UP
  3. Bush, Ronald. T. S. Eliot, "A Study in Character and Style" (1983), Oxford UP
  4. Cascardi, Anthony J., "The Subject of Modernity" (1992), Cambridge UP
  5. Chiesa, Lorenzo, "Subjectivity and Otherness: A Philosophical Reading of Lacan" (2007), The MIT Press
  6. Davidson, Harriet, "Improper Desire: Reading ‘The Waste Land’ in : The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot", pp.121~131 (1994), Cambridge UP
  7. Derrida, Jacques, "Speech and Phenomena" (1973), Northwestern UP
  8. Eliot, T. S., "On Poetry and Poets" (1961), The Noonday
  9. Eliot, T. S., "Selected Essay" (1980), Faber
  10. Eliot, T. S., "The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism", Faber
  11. Eliot, T. S., "The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot" (1969), Faber
  12. Eliot, T. S., "Konwledge and Experience in the Philosophy of F. H. Bradley" (1964), Faber
  13. Foucault, Michel, "The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Science in : Les mots et les choses" (1994), A Division of Random House
  14. Gardner, Helen, "The Art of T. S. Eliot" (1968), Faber and Faber
  15. Giddens, Anthony, "The Consequences of Modernity" (1990), Stanford UP
  16. Gray, Piers. T. S., "Eliot’s Intellectual and Poetic Development 1909-1922" (1982), Harvester P
  17. Jameson, Fredric, "Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism" (1991), Duke UP
  18. Jameson, Fredric, "Postmodernsim and Consumer Society in : The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture", pp.127~144 (1998), the New P
  19. Homer, Sean, "Jacques Lacan" (2005), Routledge
  20. Lacan, Jacques, "Ecrits" (2006), W. W. Norton
  21. Moody, A. D., "Eliot’s Spirit: Essays on His Poetry and Thought" (1996), Cambridge UP
  22. Scofield, Martin. T. S., "Eliot the Poems" (1988), Cambridge UP
  23. Shusterman, Richard, "Eliot as Philosopher in : The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot", pp.31~47 (1994), Cambridge UP
  24. Skaff, William, "The Philosophy of T. S. Eliot" (1986), Philadelphia UP
  25. Smidt, Kristian, "Poetry and Belief in the Work of T. S. Eliot" (1961), Routledge
  26. Smith, Grover, "T. S. Eliot’s Poetry and Plays: A Study in Sources and Meaning" (1974), Chicago UP
  27. Williamson, George, "A Reader’s Guide to T. S. Eliot" (1967), Thames and Hudson

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)