A Pragmatic-Functional Account for Passive Constructions in Discourse
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on a pragmatic-functional perspective, this study examines a relationship between the syntactic structure of a passive voice and its discourse-motivated pragmatic functions. To find out the pragmatic- oriented tendency and pragmatic factors that determine the choice of a passive construction, three information structure principles are consulted as anchoring-points: 1) the principle of ‘end-weight’; 2) the principle of ‘end-focus’; 3) the principle of ‘topic preservation’. Through a data analysis, it is proposed that the frequent occurrence of a particular type of passive in discourse is one of the reflexes of its structural advantage functionally associated with its pragmatic-motivated tendency; as a multi- functional category, passives serve as a useful text-structuring tool to thematize a given entity in patient-position and focalize a new entity in agent-position, making a rhetorical contrast between the two entities more prominent. Finally, it is suggested that the choice of a passive construction in discourse contributes to the effectiveness of message presentation and discourse organization, serving as a discourse device, creating textual coherence, and facilitating language production.
Abstract
Based on a pragmatic-functional perspective, this study examines a relationship between the syntactic structure of a passive voice and its discourse-motivated pragmatic functions. To find out the pragmatic- oriented tendency and pragmatic factors that determine the choice of a passive construction, three information structure principles are consulted as anchoring-points: 1) the principle of ‘end-weight’; 2) the principle of ‘end-focus’; 3) the principle of ‘topic preservation’. Through a data analysis, it is proposed that the frequent occurrence of a particular type of passive in discourse is one of the reflexes of its structural advantage functionally associated with its pragmatic-motivated tendency; as a multi- functional category, passives serve as a useful text-structuring tool to thematize a given entity in patient-position and focalize a new entity in agent-position, making a rhetorical contrast between the two entities more prominent. Finally, it is suggested that the choice of a passive construction in discourse contributes to the effectiveness of message presentation and discourse organization, serving as a discourse device, creating textual coherence, and facilitating language production.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ariel,M, "Referring and accessibility", Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), pp.65~87 (1988)
- Arnold, J, "Heaviness vs.newness:The effects of structural complexity and dsicourse status on constituent ordering", Language, 76(1), pp.28~55 (2000)
- Brown, G, "Discourse Analysis" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- EFL teacher’s course, "The grammar book:An ESL", pp.1999, Cele-Murcia, M
- Chafe,W, "Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view, In Subject and topic", pp.25~56 (1976), Academic Press
- Chafe,W, "Cognitive constraints on information flow, In Coherence and grounding in discourse" (1987), John Benjamins
- Clark, H, "Comprehension and the given-new contract, In Discourse production and comprehension", pp.1~40 (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Declerck,R, "A Comprehensive descriptive grammar of English" (1990), Kaitakusha
- Givón,T, "Syntax: A functional-typological introduction" (1990), John Benjamins
- Givón,T, "On interpreting text-distributional correlations: some methodological issues, In Pragmatics of word order flexibility" (1992), John Benjamins
- Gundel,K, "Universals of topic-comment structure, In Studies in syntactic typology" (1988), John Benjamins
- Gundel, K., "Givenness,implicature,and demonstrative expressions in English discourse", CLS, 25, pp.89~103 (1989)
- Hawkins,A, "A performance theory of order and constituency" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Lambrecht,K, "Information structure and sentence form:Topic,focus,and the mental representations of discourse referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Leech, G, "A Communicative Grammar of English" (1975), Longman
- Lock,G, "Functional English grammar:An introduction for second language teachers" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Prince.E, "On the given", new distinction, 1979, 267~278
- Prince,E, "a taxonomy of given-new information, In Radical pragmatics", pp.223~255 (1981), Academic Press
- Prince.E, "The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status, In Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fund raising text", pp.295~325 (1992), John Benjamins
- Shibatani,M, "Passives and related constructions", Language, 61(4), pp.821~848 (1985)
- Strauss,S, "Why ‘this’ and ‘that’ are not complete without ‘it’", The 29th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.403~417 (1993)
- Thompson,S, "The Passive in English: A discourse perspective, In In Honor of Ilse Lehiste. Dordrecht", pp.497~511 (1987), Foris Publications
- Yule,G, "Explaining english grammar" (1998), Oxford University Press