다양한 미래시제의 선택과 사용에 관한 연구: 원어민과 한국인 비원어민화자의 설문 분석을 중심으로
A Study of Choice and Use between Various Interchangeable Future Tenses in English: Based on the Survey-analysis of Native and Korean Non-native Speakers
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the need for a pragmatic approach of choice and use between various interchangeable future expressions such as will, be going to, will be∼ing, be∼ing and Simple Present. From the survey-based analysis, the major findings are shown as follows; 1) Various future expressions may be recognized by native and non-native speakers. However, non-native speakers are unfamiliar with the choice of various future forms in real language use 2) Simple Present tense, be∼ing (Present Progressive), will and will be∼ing (future progressive) tend to be generally evenly replaced with future-expressions by native speakers. On the other hand, will and be going to are mostly preferred by non-native speakers, which means they usually use limited future expressions 3) Adjacent tenses resulting from ‘resilience of tense’ allow language users to make a flexible choice for a proper meaning. 4) Future tense tends to be more open with tense-extension, compared to other tenses. This means future tense can be naturally shown in various forms. As a result, these findings show that pragmatic dimension should be taught for better understanding of various future tenses by Korean English learners.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the need for a pragmatic approach of choice and use between various interchangeable future expressions such as will, be going to, will be∼ing, be∼ing and Simple Present. From the survey-based analysis, the major findings are shown as follows; 1) Various future expressions may be recognized by native and non-native speakers. However, non-native speakers are unfamiliar with the choice of various future forms in real language use 2) Simple Present tense, be∼ing (Present Progressive), will and will be∼ing (future progressive) tend to be generally evenly replaced with future-expressions by native speakers. On the other hand, will and be going to are mostly preferred by non-native speakers, which means they usually use limited future expressions 3) Adjacent tenses resulting from ‘resilience of tense’ allow language users to make a flexible choice for a proper meaning. 4) Future tense tends to be more open with tense-extension, compared to other tenses. This means future tense can be naturally shown in various forms. As a result, these findings show that pragmatic dimension should be taught for better understanding of various future tenses by Korean English learners.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김수원, "유나크 쏙쏙 영문법" (2017), 맑은샘
- 김진홍, "GRAMMAR ZONE 종합편" (2017), 능률교육
- 송성문, "성문종합영어" (2007), 성문출판사
- 태, "초강력 영문법: 시제", pp.2009, 심상철
- 이찬용, "DICA 시제. 가정법" (2007), 천재교육
- 임나현, "원어민과 한국인 비원어민화자의영어의 특정시제의 선택과 사용에 관한 연구-설문 분석을 중심으로-", 언어학 연구, (58), pp.227~249 (2021), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Azar, Betty S., "Fundamentals of English grammar" (2003), Longman
- Benz, Cheryl, "Grammar dimensions 2:Workbook" (2000), Thomson Heinle
- Chelsom, Peter, "Shall we dance", Simon Fields, ~ (2004)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Aspect of theory of the syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Flynn, Kathleen, "Grammar dimensions 3: Workbook" (2000), Thomson Heinle
- Hewings, Martine, "Advanced grammar in use" (1999), Cambridge University
- Murphy, Raymond, "English grammar in use" (1994), Cambridge University press
- Quirk, Randolph, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Riggenbach, Heidi, "Grammar dimensions 2:Form, meaning, use" (2000), Heinle & Heinle
- Thewlis, Stephen, "Grammar dimensions 3: Form, meaning, and use" (2000), Thomson Heinle
- Yule, George, "Oxford practice grammar" (2006), Oxford University Press
