A Study on the Different Realizations of dis- in English
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focuses on the variant realizations of the English prefix dis-. Studying dis- has been overshadowed by the common prefix realization studies with respect to in-, con-, un-, and non-. The common affix study has typically explained the variant realizations by adopting the division of affix classes and their phonological behaviors. However, the English prefix dis- shows aberrant realization patterns, which cannot be ascribed to the different affix classes. It is because the prefix dis- shows both realization patterns of Class-I and Class-II prefixes. Even though the prefix dis- belongs to Class-II in traditional classification, it does not follow the typical Class-II realization patterns. However, the variant realization patterns are motivated by the status of the bases. When the prefix occurs before a bound stem, the prefix final fricative does not appear in the output, while it occurs before a free-standing stem. This dual behavior of the prefix can be explained by using constraints that are domain-specific so that constraints can reflect the dual realization of the prefix. Thus, the current study reveals that the traditional division of affixes into distinct classes is not a monolithic criterion in explaining the prefix realizations.
Abstract
This study focuses on the variant realizations of the English prefix dis-. Studying dis- has been overshadowed by the common prefix realization studies with respect to in-, con-, un-, and non-. The common affix study has typically explained the variant realizations by adopting the division of affix classes and their phonological behaviors. However, the English prefix dis- shows aberrant realization patterns, which cannot be ascribed to the different affix classes. It is because the prefix dis- shows both realization patterns of Class-I and Class-II prefixes. Even though the prefix dis- belongs to Class-II in traditional classification, it does not follow the typical Class-II realization patterns. However, the variant realization patterns are motivated by the status of the bases. When the prefix occurs before a bound stem, the prefix final fricative does not appear in the output, while it occurs before a free-standing stem. This dual behavior of the prefix can be explained by using constraints that are domain-specific so that constraints can reflect the dual realization of the prefix. Thus, the current study reveals that the traditional division of affixes into distinct classes is not a monolithic criterion in explaining the prefix realizations.
참고문헌 (25)
- Allen, Margaret, "Morphological investigations", pp.1978
- Bauer, Laurie, "The Oxford reference guide to English morphology" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Beckman, Jill, "Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony", Phonology, 14(1), pp.1~46 (1997)
- Beckman, Jill, "Optimality theory: A reader", pp.310~342 (2004), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- 정진완, "Asymmetrical Realizations of Inflectional Suffixes in English", 영어영문학연구, 62(3), pp.237~262 (2020), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 정진완, "Uneven Realizations of NC̥ and NS in English", 영어영문학연구, 63(2), pp.221~245 (2021), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- de Lacy, Paul, "The formal expression of markedness", pp.2002
- de Lacy, Paul, "Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Hamawand, Zeki, "The semantics of English negative prefixes" (2009), Equinox Publishing Ltd
- Kawahara, Shigeto, "University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Lingusitics: Papers in Optimality Theory III", pp.145~186 (2007), GLSA
- Kang, Seok-keun, "English nasa-final prefixes and uniform exponence", Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia conference on language, pp.118~126 (1998), Chinese and Oriental Languages Information Processing Society
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Linguistics in the morning calm 1:Selected papers from SICOL", pp.3~91 (1982), Hanshin
- Kiparsky, Paul, "Some consequences of lexical phonology", Phonology Yearbook, 2, pp.85~138 (1985)
- Lombardi, Linda, "Coronal epenthesis and markedness", Phonology, 19, pp.219~252 (2002)
- McCarthy, John, "OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.206~263 (1986)
- McCarthy, John, "University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18: Papers in Optimality Theory", pp.249~384 (1995), GLSA
- Pająk, Bożena, "Contextual constraints on geminates: The case of Polish", Berkeley Linguistic Society, 35(1), pp.269~280 (2009)
- Plag, Ingo, "Word-formation in English" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Podesva, Robert, "Segmental constraints in the representation of consonantal sequences in Polish", Paper presented at the 76th LSA Meeting (2002)
- Prince, Alan, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar", Ms, pp.1993
- Prince, Alan, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" (2004), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Rice, Keren, "The Cambridge handbook of phonology", pp.79~97 (2007), Cambridge Univeristy Press
- Rose, Sharon, "Rethinking geminates, long-distance geminates, and the OCP", Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), pp.85~122 (2000)
- Siegel, Dorothy, "Topics in English morphology", pp.1974
- Spencer, Andrew, "Phonology" (1996), Blackwell Publishers Ltd