본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Morphological Status of Prefix and Nasal Assimilation in English

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study focuses on nasal assimilation occurring across the boundary between a nasal‐final prefix and a consonant-initial base in English. It is argued that the coronal nasal of a Class I prefix undergoes assimilation when followed by a non‐coronal consonant initial base. On the other hand, the coronal nasal of a Class II prefix does not undergo any featural change in the same phonological environment. Thus, this assimilation pattern difference between Class I and Class II is ascribed to a morphological status difference between affixes, which has been evinced in traditional morphology. This difference is implemented as constraint ranking difference in the analysis. For a prefix which cannot be classified uniformly as either class is explained by adopting Uniform Exponence. This specific constraint can effectively explain the assimilation pattern difference between an obstruent-initial and a sonorant-initial base. By including Uniform Exponence, we could propose one constraint ranking which can explain nasal assimilation in English. We could also extend the analysis to other nasal assimilation examples that are from affixes belonging to other affix classes.

Abstract

This study focuses on nasal assimilation occurring across the boundary between a nasal‐final prefix and a consonant-initial base in English. It is argued that the coronal nasal of a Class I prefix undergoes assimilation when followed by a non‐coronal consonant initial base. On the other hand, the coronal nasal of a Class II prefix does not undergo any featural change in the same phonological environment. Thus, this assimilation pattern difference between Class I and Class II is ascribed to a morphological status difference between affixes, which has been evinced in traditional morphology. This difference is implemented as constraint ranking difference in the analysis. For a prefix which cannot be classified uniformly as either class is explained by adopting Uniform Exponence. This specific constraint can effectively explain the assimilation pattern difference between an obstruent-initial and a sonorant-initial base. By including Uniform Exponence, we could propose one constraint ranking which can explain nasal assimilation in English. We could also extend the analysis to other nasal assimilation examples that are from affixes belonging to other affix classes.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Allen, M. R, "Morphological investigation", Doctor, pp.1978
  2. Bauer, L, "The Oxford reference guide to English morphology" (2013), Oxford University Press
  3. Borowsky, T, "Topics in the lexical phonology of English", Doctor, pp.1986
  4. Chomsky, N, "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
  5. 정진완, "Realization of English Medial Consonant Clusters by Korean Speakers", 영어영문학연구, 39(2), pp.221~244 (2013), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
  6. Lacy, P, "The formal expression of markedness", Doctor, pp.2002
  7. de Lacy, P, "Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  8. Harris, J, "English sound structure" (1994), Blackwell Publishers
  9. Kager, R, "Optimality theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  10. Kang, S-K, "English nasal-final prefixes and uniform exponence", Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation 18-20 February 1998, Singapore, pp.118~126 (1998), Chinese and Oriental Languages Information Processing Society
  11. Kenstowicz, M, "Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternative to cyclicity", Ms, pp.1995
  12. Kiparsky, P, "Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.3~97 (1982), Hanshin Publishing Company
  13. Kiparsky, P, "Phonology Yearbook, 2", pp.85~138 (1985)
  14. Lombardi, L, "Evidence for MaxFeature constraints from Japanese. ROA-247", ~ (1998)
  15. Lombardi, L, "Coronal epenthesis and markedness", Phonology, 19, pp.219~252 (2002)
  16. McCarthy, J. J, "OCP effects: Gemination and anti-gemination", Linguistic Inquiry, 17(2), pp.207~264 (1986)
  17. McCarthy, J. J, "Papers in optimality theory", pp.249~384 (1995), GLSA
  18. Prince, A. S, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar", ms, pp.1993
  19. Prince, A. S, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" (2004), Blackwell
  20. Rice, K, "The Cambridge handbook of phonology", pp.79~97 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  21. Roca, I, "A course in phonology" (1999), Blackwell Publishers Inc
  22. Siegel, D, "Topics in English morphology", Doctor, pp.1974
  23. Spencer, A, "Phonology" (1996), Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  24. Stonham, J, "Introduction to phonology" (2009), Hankookmunhwasa
  25. Wolfram, W, "Phonological analysis: Focus on American English" (2006), Pearson Education, Inc
  26. Zsiga, E. C, "The Blackwell companion to phonology Vol III: Phonological processes", pp.1919~1944 (1919), Wiley-Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)