본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

옴니채널 성향, 조절초점과 고려상표군 형성에 관한 연구

The Influence of Omni-channel Propensity and Regulatory Focus on Consideration Set Formation

한상설
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2019.05|산경연구논집 (The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business)|제10권 제5호|pp. 49-58

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Omni-channelprice consciousnessConsideration Set(heterogeneousnewness)Regulatory Focus.

초록

Purpose - Consumer behaviors or decision-making process has been changing recently as the consumer environment, including mobile everyday life, has changed. In view of this changing consumer smart environment, this study aims to investigate structural relation about the influence omni-channel propensity and regulatory focus on consideration set formation. Research design, data, and methodology - In order to proceed with this study, we review previous studies and setting hypotheses. The hypothesis was verified through a survey that was conducted for university students with experience in purchasing in less than three months. With reference to previous studies, operational definition was made for the questionnaire design. From 2018 Nov. to 2019 Feb. Survey was conducted on the panel consumers who purchase item within that period. 315 collected survey data were used to verify hypotheses except the data that had incorrect values. This data were used for SPSS/AMOS for confirm hypothesis which developed by researcher. Results - The results of this study are as follows. First, Consumers were considering a more heterogeneous alternatives if they were more omni-channel propensity in the process of forming consideration set. Second, Consumers were more conscious of the price if they were more omni-channel propensity Third, Consumers were considering a more newness alternatives if they were more omni-channel propensity in the process of forming consideration set. Meanwhile, The results of the study on regulatory focus and consideration set relationships are as follows. Consumers were considering a more heterogeneous alternatives if they were more promotion focus tendency in the process of forming consideration set. Second, Prevention focus tendency were more conscious of the price in the process of considering alternatives. Third, Consumers were considering a more newness alternatives if they were more promotion focus tendency. Conclusions - Depending on the changing consumer environment, the omni-channel propensity was shown to influence the formation of the consideration set. Also, Regulatory focus of consumers significantly influence to formation of consideration set. this study also contributes to the development of the theory as well as the practical approach with understanding consumer decision process on smart(mobile) environment.

Abstract

Purpose - Consumer behaviors or decision-making process has been changing recently as the consumer environment, including mobile everyday life, has changed. In view of this changing consumer smart environment, this study aims to investigate structural relation about the influence omni-channel propensity and regulatory focus on consideration set formation. Research design, data, and methodology - In order to proceed with this study, we review previous studies and setting hypotheses. The hypothesis was verified through a survey that was conducted for university students with experience in purchasing in less than three months. With reference to previous studies, operational definition was made for the questionnaire design. From 2018 Nov. to 2019 Feb. Survey was conducted on the panel consumers who purchase item within that period. 315 collected survey data were used to verify hypotheses except the data that had incorrect values. This data were used for SPSS/AMOS for confirm hypothesis which developed by researcher. Results - The results of this study are as follows. First, Consumers were considering a more heterogeneous alternatives if they were more omni-channel propensity in the process of forming consideration set. Second, Consumers were more conscious of the price if they were more omni-channel propensity Third, Consumers were considering a more newness alternatives if they were more omni-channel propensity in the process of forming consideration set. Meanwhile, The results of the study on regulatory focus and consideration set relationships are as follows. Consumers were considering a more heterogeneous alternatives if they were more promotion focus tendency in the process of forming consideration set. Second, Prevention focus tendency were more conscious of the price in the process of considering alternatives. Third, Consumers were considering a more newness alternatives if they were more promotion focus tendency. Conclusions - Depending on the changing consumer environment, the omni-channel propensity was shown to influence the formation of the consideration set. Also, Regulatory focus of consumers significantly influence to formation of consideration set. this study also contributes to the development of the theory as well as the practical approach with understanding consumer decision process on smart(mobile) environment.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Avnet, T., "How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions", Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), pp.1~10 (2006)
  2. Bodur, H. O., "When Do Consumer Prefer More Choice? Moderating Effects of Regulatory Focus", Advances in Consumer Research, 35, pp.787~788 (2008)
  3. Brockner, J., "Regulatory Focus and the Probability Estimates of Conjunctive and Disjunctive Events", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), pp.5~24 (2002)
  4. Chakravarti, A., "The influence of macro-level motives on consideration set composition in novel purchase situations", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), pp.244~258 (2003)
  5. Chatterjee, P., "Multi-channel and Cross-channel Shopping Behavior Role of Consumer Shopping Orientations", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(1), pp.9~24 (2010)
  6. Chowdhury, T. G., "Role of Variety-Seeking Trait In Purchases Made for Others", pp.2004
  7. Nak-Hwan Choi, "Effects of Performance, Imagery and Regulatory Focus on Customer Engagement", 유통과학연구, 17(1), pp.57~72 (2019), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  8. Christy, M. K., "The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis and Integrative Model", Decision Support Systems, 54(1), pp.461~470 (2012)
  9. Chu, S. C., "Determinants Of Consumer Engagement In Electronic Word-Of-Mouth(Ewom)In Social Networking Sites", International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), pp.47~75 (2011)
  10. Crowe, E., "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, pp.117~132 (1997)
  11. Dinet, J., "Information Search Activity : An Overview", Revue Europeanenne de Psychologie Appli quee, 62(2), pp.49~62 (2012)
  12. Forster, J., "How Global versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus", Journal of Psychological Science, 16(8), pp.631~636 (2005)
  13. Forster, Jens, "Speed", Accuracy Decisions in Task Performance: Built-in Tradeoff or Separate Strategic Concerns ?, 2003, pp.90(1), 148~164
  14. Goodman, J. K., "Help or Hinder? When Recommendation Signage Expands Consideration Sets and Heightens Decision Difficulty", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), pp.165~174 (2013)
  15. Reference Dependence and Loss Aversion in Choice Set Formation and Brand Selection, "Han, S. M.", The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, ~ (1995)
  16. Higgins, E. T., "Self-discrepancies and Biographical Memory : Personality and Cognition at the Level of Psychological Situation", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), pp.527~535 (1992)
  17. Higgins, E. T., "Beyond Pleasure and Pain", American Psychologist, 52(12), pp.1280~1300 (1997)
  18. Higgins, E. T., "How Self-regulation Creates Distinct Values : The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), pp.177~191 (2002)
  19. 장창권, "옴니채널 커머스에 대한 소비자의 지각된 가치와 만족이 쇼핑 채널 전환의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 16(4), pp.203~228 (2016), 한국인터넷전자상거래학회
  20. Kardes, F. R., "Brand Retrieval, Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice and the Pioneering Advantage", Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), pp.62~75 (1993)
  21. Nae-Eun Kim, "나르시시즘 성향, 패션소셜미디어 이용동기, 정보확산 행동 간 관계 연구", 산경연구논집, 9(1), pp.99~110 (2018), 한국유통과학회
  22. Lee, A. Y., "Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness", Journal of Consumer Research, 36, pp.735~747 (2010)
  23. Liberman, N. D., "Promotion and Prevention Focus on Alternative Hypotheses : Implications for Attributional Functions", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), pp.5~18 (2001)
  24. Liberman, N., "Promotion and Prevention Choices between Stability and Change", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1135~1145 (1999)
  25. Lichtenstein, D. R., "Correlates of Price Acceptability", Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp.243~252 (1988)
  26. Liu, C., "Sustaining Online Shopping : Moderating Role of Online Shopping Motives", Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(2), pp.83~103 (2010)
  27. Lockwood, P., "Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models : Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us", Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(4), pp.854~864 (2002)
  28. 민동원, "심리적 기질이 옴니채널 쇼핑 선호에 미치는 영향 연구: 외향성-내향성 및 다양성 추구 성향을 중심으로", 디지털융복합연구, 14(1), pp.91~97 (2016), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  29. Park, S. K., "An Empirical Study on Consumer Online Shopping Channel Choice Behavior in Omni-channel Environment", Telematics and Informatics, 34, pp.1398~1407 (2017)
  30. 박승환, "소비자 옴니채널 성향과 소비자-브랜드 관계에 관한 연구: 브랜드 경험 조절효과", 유통과학연구, 14(11), pp.129~138 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  31. Peter, J. P., "Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy" (1990), Irwin
  32. Pham, M. T., "Inside Consumption: Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires" (2005), Routledge
  33. Piotrowicz, W., "Introduction to The Special Issue Information Technology in Retail : Toward Omnichannel Retailing", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), pp.5~16 (2014)
  34. Reilly, M., "Individual and Product Correlates of Evoked Set Size for Consumer Package Goods", Advances in Consumer Research, 12, pp.4922~4497 (1985)
  35. Shocker. A. D., "Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice : Issiesn Models, and Suggestions", Marketing Letters, 2, pp.181~198 (1991)
  36. Min-Sun Yeom, "멀티채널 환경에서 정보탐색채널과 구매채널의 불일치 현상에 관한 연구: 쇼루밍 현상을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 13(9), pp.81~93 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  37. 임덕순, "옴니채널의 지각된 편리성과 유용성이 옴니채널 사용과 소비자-브랜드 관계에 미치는 영향", 유통과학연구, 14(7), pp.83~90 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  38. 조염, "온라인구전광고의 방향성과 유형이 구매의도에 미치는 영향과 조절초점의 조절효과", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 8(1), pp.121~131 (2018), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

조절초점과 의사결정 어려움이 고려상표군 구성의 이질성에 미치는 효과류강석, 박기경, 한영지한국소비자학회 · 소비자학연구2016 · 제27권 제6호조절초점(regulatory focus)이 선택대안의 구성에 미치는 영향: 만족/불만족 경험의 조절효과성정연, 전선규, 정유정한국소비자학회 · 소비자학연구2013 · 제24권 제3호옴니채널 쇼핑동기가 패션제품 구매의사결정단계별 소비자의 옴니채널 전략 소구에 미치는 영향 연구김애경, 이은정복식문화학회 · 복식문화연구2018 · 제26권 제1호조절초점이 다양성추구행동에 미치는 영향: 옵션매력성의 조절효과박소진한국전략마케팅학회 · 마케팅논집(Journal of Marketing Studies)2014 · 제22권 제1호소비자 옴니채널 성향과 소비자-브랜드 관계에 관한 연구: 브랜드 경험 조절효과박승환한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2016 · 제14권 제11호The Differential Factors Influencing Online & Mobile Shopping Behavior이희정한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2017 · 제15권 제9호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

A Study on Factor Analytical Methods and Procedures for PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling)임명성pp. 7-20On exploring factors for enhancing export competitiveness in IT Convergence industries김희철, 김민철pp. 21-262018년 네이버 쇼핑의 고용영향 평가정연승, 김흥규pp. 27-36체면 관점에서 본 동서양 소비자들의 소비행동에 관한 고찰: 비교문화 접근방법Young-Doo Kimpp. 37-47신뢰가 학생침묵과 이탈의도에 미치는 영향조현진pp. 59-66
원문 보기