Effect of Real Estate Holding Type on Household Debt
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to provide implications for the government's housing supply policy by analyzing the factors that determine the type of real estate holding and household debt. This study started from the awareness that the determinants of household debt differ depending on the type of real estate holding. Research design, data and methodology: Real estate ownership type was classified and analyzed into 4 models: model 1 (1 household 1 house and self-resident), model 2 (1 household multiple real estate ownership and selfresident), model 3 (1 household 1 house and rent residence), model 4 (1 household holds a large number of real estate and rent residence). The analysis method used multiple regression analysis. The dependent variable was household total debt. As independent variables, household debt, annual gross household income, financial assets, real estate net assets, annual repayment, demographic & residential characteristics were used. Results: 1) Model 4 has the highest household debt and the highest gross income, Model 2 has the most real estate mortgage loans and real estate net asset, and Model 1 has the highest real estate mortgage payments. 2) The positive factor of common household debt determinants is real estate net assets, and the negative factor is financial assets. 3) It was the net assets of real estate that acted as a positive factor in common for the four models. In other words, the more financial assets, the less household debt. It was analyzed that the more net assets of real estate, the more household debt. The annual repayment of financial liabilities had no influence on household debt, while the annual repayment of loan liabilities and household debt had a positive relationship. Conclusions: 1) It is necessary to introduce benefits and systems that can increase the proportion of household financial asset. Specific alternatives include tax benefits and reduced fees for financial asset investment. 2) In the case where a homeless person prepares one house for one household, it is necessary to prepare various support measures according to the income level. The specific alternative is to give additional points for pre-sale or apply an interest rate cut incentive for mortgage loans.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to provide implications for the government's housing supply policy by analyzing the factors that determine the type of real estate holding and household debt. This study started from the awareness that the determinants of household debt differ depending on the type of real estate holding. Research design, data and methodology: Real estate ownership type was classified and analyzed into 4 models: model 1 (1 household 1 house and self-resident), model 2 (1 household multiple real estate ownership and selfresident), model 3 (1 household 1 house and rent residence), model 4 (1 household holds a large number of real estate and rent residence). The analysis method used multiple regression analysis. The dependent variable was household total debt. As independent variables, household debt, annual gross household income, financial assets, real estate net assets, annual repayment, demographic & residential characteristics were used. Results: 1) Model 4 has the highest household debt and the highest gross income, Model 2 has the most real estate mortgage loans and real estate net asset, and Model 1 has the highest real estate mortgage payments. 2) The positive factor of common household debt determinants is real estate net assets, and the negative factor is financial assets. 3) It was the net assets of real estate that acted as a positive factor in common for the four models. In other words, the more financial assets, the less household debt. It was analyzed that the more net assets of real estate, the more household debt. The annual repayment of financial liabilities had no influence on household debt, while the annual repayment of loan liabilities and household debt had a positive relationship. Conclusions: 1) It is necessary to introduce benefits and systems that can increase the proportion of household financial asset. Specific alternatives include tax benefits and reduced fees for financial asset investment. 2) In the case where a homeless person prepares one house for one household, it is necessary to prepare various support measures according to the income level. The specific alternative is to give additional points for pre-sale or apply an interest rate cut incentive for mortgage loans.
참고문헌 (24)
- Myoung-Jin CHAE, "Individual Employees’ Service Failures and Customer Satisfaction with the Firm", 유통과학연구, 18(8), pp.35~45 (2020), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
- Dong-Rack Choi, "A Study on the Effects of Small Business Management Result by the Korean Government: Focus on SEMAS", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 7(3), pp.33~43 (2017), 한국유통과학회
- Radyan DANANJOYO, "The Prominence of Financial Considerations on Housing Investors’ Purchase Decisions", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), pp.869~875 (2020), 한국유통과학회
- Hery GUNARDI, "The Performance of Private Wealth Management in Indonesia", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), pp.717~725 (2020), 한국유통과학회
- 권재현, "Formation of Corporate Governance in Korea: The Rise of Chaebols (1910-1980)", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 5(4), pp.67~72 (2015), 한국유통과학회
- Yusriadi HALA, "The Financial Behavior of Investment Decision Making Between Real and Financial Assets Sectors", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), pp.635~645 (2020), 한국유통과학회
- 전지홍, "The Impact of Asian Economic Policy Uncertainty : Evidence from Korean Housing Market", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(2), pp.43~51 (2018), 한국유통과학회
- 전지홍, "Uncertainty and Manufacturing Stock Market in Korea", 산경연구논집, 10(1), pp.29~37 (2019), 한국유통과학회
- Ji-Hong Jeon, "Dynamic Spillover for the Economic Risk in Korea on Global Uncertainty", 유통과학연구, 17(1), pp.11~19 (2019), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
- 정동빈, "Forecasting for a Credit Loan from Households in South Korea", 산경연구논집, 8(4), pp.15~21 (2017), 한국유통과학회
- Dongho Kim, "Economic Popularism and Globalization", 유통과학연구, 18(3), pp.37~41 (2020), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
- 김정근, "위계적 APC모델을 활용한 가계부채결정원인 분석: 베이비부머세대 포함 중·장년·노년층을 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(9), pp.396~405 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- "A simple theory of exploding household debts. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 70849" (2016)[URL]
- 이미혜, "Does Population Aging Contribute to Increased Fiscal Spending?", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 9(4), pp.23~28 (2019), 한국유통과학회
- 이종희, "소득계층별 한국 차입 가계의 부실화 가능성 연구", 가족자원경영과 정책, 22(1), pp.63~78 (2018), 한국가족자원경영학회[DOI]
- 이종희, "Effects of the Great Recession on Debt Repayment Problems of Hispanic Households in the United States", Family and Environment Research, 55(3), pp.275~287 (2017), 대한가정학회[DOI]
- 이신남, "가계부채의 결정요인에 관한 실증적 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 14(5), pp.177~183 (2016), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 오만숙, "한국국민의 가계 금융부채에 대한 체감도 분석", 응용통계연구, 22(2), pp.297~307 (2009), 한국통계학회
- Hyoung-Kyoo Park, "자산가격의 결정요인에 대한 실증분석 : 미국사례를 중심으로", 산경연구논집, 9(5), pp.63~72 (2018), 한국유통과학회
- 박윤태, "가구의 소득분위별 가계부채 주관적 상환부담요인에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(9), pp.145~158 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- "Financing a Sustainable Future for Emerging Markets" (2020)[URL]
- Son Hung TRAN, "Financial Development, Business Cycle and Bank Risk in Southeast Asian Countries", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), pp.127~135 (2020), 한국유통과학회
- Byong-Kook Yoo, "Formation of Employment Subcenters and Regional Industry Restructuring: Focusing Wholesale and Retail Sector in Incheon", 유통과학연구, 18(2), pp.59~67 (2020), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
- Adi WIJAYA, "Economic Performance: Leading Sector, Economic Structure and Competitiveness of Export Commodities", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 10(3), pp.23~33 (2020), 한국유통과학회