본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Interaction Effects of Lay Theories and Failure Type on Adaptive versus Compensatory Consumption Behavior

Li Wang|최낙환|Chang Chen
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2018.07|산경연구논집 (The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business)|제9권 제7호|pp. 19-32

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Self-regulationCompensatory ConsumptionAdaptive ConsumptionLay Theory

초록

Purpose - This paper aims at exploring the effects of failure types such as failure in promotion orientation and failure in prevention orientation on consumers' consumption behavior, and the moderation role of lay theories in the effects. Research design, data, and methodology – This study employed 2 between-subject designs(failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) and also 2 (failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) with implicit self as the within-subject. Chinese consumers participated in the empirical study, and to verify the hypotheses ANOVA, T-test and regression analysis were used. Results – Consumers were more likely to choose adaptive consumption behavior rather than compensatory consumption behavior when they were encountered with failure in promotion orientation versus failure in prevention orientation. Lay theories did play the moderation role in the effect of failure types on consumption behavior. The incremental theorists who think that effort is an important way to accomplish their learning goals showed more willingness to conduct compensatory consumption behavior rather than adaptive consumption behavior. Conclusions – Marketers should put more attention on the ways by which their products can help consumers self-improve when consumers encounter with failure. They should also be aware of the importance of consumers' mindsets when designing and developing advertising messages.

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims at exploring the effects of failure types such as failure in promotion orientation and failure in prevention orientation on consumers' consumption behavior, and the moderation role of lay theories in the effects. Research design, data, and methodology – This study employed 2 between-subject designs(failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) and also 2 (failure in promotion orientation vs. failure in prevention orientation) with implicit self as the within-subject. Chinese consumers participated in the empirical study, and to verify the hypotheses ANOVA, T-test and regression analysis were used. Results – Consumers were more likely to choose adaptive consumption behavior rather than compensatory consumption behavior when they were encountered with failure in promotion orientation versus failure in prevention orientation. Lay theories did play the moderation role in the effect of failure types on consumption behavior. The incremental theorists who think that effort is an important way to accomplish their learning goals showed more willingness to conduct compensatory consumption behavior rather than adaptive consumption behavior. Conclusions – Marketers should put more attention on the ways by which their products can help consumers self-improve when consumers encounter with failure. They should also be aware of the importance of consumers' mindsets when designing and developing advertising messages.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Aaker, D. A., "Building Strong Brands" (1996), Free Press
  2. Andrade, E. B., "Behavioral consequences of affect : Combining evaluative and regulatory mechanisms", Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), pp.355~362 (2005)
  3. Baas, M., "A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research : Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?", Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), pp.779~806 (2008)
  4. Brendl, C. M., "Principles of judging valence : What makes events positive or negative?", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, pp.95~160 (1996)
  5. Brockner, J., "Regulatory focus theory : Implications for the study of emotions at work", Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(1), pp.35~66 (2001)
  6. Carver, C. S., "Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior" (2012), Springer Science & Business Media
  7. Carver, C. S., "Threat sensitivity, incentive sensitivity, and the experience of relief", Journal of Personality, 77(1), pp.125~138 (2009)
  8. 최낙환, "목적성취에 대한 프라이드 유형별 노력과 자질의 귀인과 사고의 틀", 유통과학연구, 14(2), pp.57~63 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  9. 최낙환, "The Effects of Self-Referencing and Counteractive Construal on Consumption Goal Reversion", 유통과학연구, 12(3), pp.7~15 (2014), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  10. 최낙환, "The Effect of Ambient Sadness on Hedonic Choice", 유통과학연구, 13(3), pp.11~19 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  11. Crowe, E., "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations : Promotion and prevention in decision-making", Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 69(2), pp.117~132 (1997)
  12. Deci, E. L., "The "what" and "why"of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior", Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp.227~268 (2000)
  13. Dweck, C. S., "Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, personality, and Development" (2013), Psychology Press
  14. Dweck, C. S., "Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions : A word from two perspectives", Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), pp.267~285 (1995)
  15. Forgas, J. P., "Affect in social judgments and decisions : A multiprocess model", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, pp.227~275 (1992)
  16. Gao, L., "The "shaken self": Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence", Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), pp.29~38 (2008)
  17. Han, D., "Signaling status with luxury goods : The role of brand prominence", Journal of Marketing, 74(4), pp.15~30 (2015)
  18. Higgins, E. T., "Beyond pleasure and pain", American Psychologist, 52(12), pp.1280~1300 (1997)
  19. Higgins, E. T., "Promotion and prevention : Regulatory focus as a motivational principle", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, pp.1~46 (1998)
  20. Higgins, T., "Self-discrepancies and biographical memory : Personality and cognition at the level of psychological situation", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), pp.527~535 (1992)
  21. Higgins, E. T., "Motivation and Self-Regulation Across the Life Span", pp.78~113 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  22. Idson, L. C., "Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains : A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), pp.252~274 (2000)
  23. Kim, S., "From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption : The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits", Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), pp.526~542 (2014)
  24. Kim, S., "Bracing for the psychological storm : Proactive versus reactive compensatory consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), pp.815~830 (2012)
  25. Mandel, N., "The compensatory consumer behavior model : How self‐discrepancies drive consumer behavior", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), pp.133~146 (2017)
  26. McGregor, I., "Approaching relief : Compensatory ideals relieve threat-induced anxiety by promoting approachmotivated states", Social Cognition, 30(6), pp.689~714 (2012)
  27. 박은지, "서비스 회복이 고객의 행동 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 서비스 회복의 공정성과 진정성을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 13(2), pp.63~73 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  28. Park, J. K., "Capitalizing on brand personalities in advertising : The influence of implicit self‐theories on ad appeal effectiveness", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), pp.424~432 (2012)
  29. Pham, M. T., "Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), pp.503~518 (2004)
  30. Proulx, T., "Threat-compensation in social psychology : Is there a core motivation?", Social Cognition, 30(6), pp.643~651 (2012)
  31. Proulx, T., "The frog in Kierkegaard’s beer : Finding meaning in the threat‐compensation literature", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), pp.889~905 (2010)
  32. Proulx, T., "Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), pp.285~291 (2012)
  33. Rook, D. W., "In the mood : Impulse buying’s affective antecedents", Research in Consumer Behavior, 6(7), pp.1~28 (1993)
  34. Rucker, D. D., "Growing beyond growth : Why multiple mindsets matter for consumer behavior", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), pp.161~164 (2016)
  35. Rucker, D. D., "Desire to acquire : Powerlessness and compensatory consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), pp.257~267 (2008)
  36. Rucker, D. D., "Power and consumer behavior : How power shapes who and what consumers value", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), pp.352~368 (2012)
  37. Schwarz, N., "Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning", Emotion and social Judgments, 23, pp.55~71 (1991)
  38. Shah, J., "Performance incentives and means : How regulatory focus influences goal attainment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), pp.285~293 (1998)
  39. Shen, H., "The impact of negative affect on responses to affect‐regulatory experiences", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), pp.39~48 (2008)
  40. Sivanathan, N., "Protecting the self through consumption : Status goods as affirmational commodities", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), pp.564~570 (2010)
  41. Tritt, S. M., "Toward a biological understanding of mortality salience(and other threat compensation processes)", Social Cognition, 30(6), pp.715~733 (2012)
  42. Zhang, L., "An exchange theory of money and self-esteem in decision making", Review of General Psychology, 13(1), pp.66~76 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Sources of Inducing Shame versus Anger at In-group Failure and Consumption TypeJingyi SHI, Li WANG, Nak-Hwan CHOI한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2020 · 제18권 제2호The Effects of Self-Referencing and Counteractive Construal on Consumption Goal Reversion최낙환, Cong Liu, Peipei Mu한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2014 · 제12권 제3호Mediation Roles of Goal Types and Emotion in the Effects of Social Identity-Based Self-Discrepancy Type on Compensatory ConsumptionNak-Hwan CHOI한국유통과학회 · 산경연구논집2021 · 제12권 제6호암묵적 자기 이론이 자기결함을 경험한 소비자의 제품유형 평가에 미치는 영향엄금철, 전은미한국소비문화학회 · 소비문화연구2022 · 제25권 제4호Mitigating Appearance Threats: The Differential Effects of Compensatory Consumption on Self-Control조이서, Eunice Eun-Sil Kim(김은실)한국마케팅학회 · 아시아마케팅저널2026 · 제27권 제4호목적성취에 대한 프라이드 유형별 노력과 자질의 귀인과 사고의 틀최낙환한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2016 · 제14권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

Consideration of Assortment Decision Criteria : Men’s Wear vs. Women’s Wear and Male vs. Female Retail BuyersYoungjin Bahngpp. 7-18A Study on the International Fisher Effect: An Investigation from South Korea and ChinaYugang Hepp. 33-42자녀 연령이 기혼여성의 경력 재단절에 미치는 영향고선, Seeun Parkpp. 43-52소유지배 괴리도가 주가급락위험에 미치는 영향채수준, 유혜영pp. 53-59온라인 여행사 사이트 e-서비스품질이 지각된 가치, 만족도, 재구매의도에 미치는 영향Jong-Ho Lee, Ling-Xiao Niupp. 61-70
원문 보기