본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중소 제조기업의 경영 성과에 미치는 영향: 경영자특성의 조절효과와 핵심역량의 매개효과

Effects of SM-sized Manufacturing Firm Management Performance: Control Effect of CEO Characteristics and Mediating Effect of Core Competence

Sang-Beom Park|Young-Dong Roh
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2018.11|산경연구논집 (The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business)|제9권 제11호|pp. 93-104

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Core CompetenceCEO CharacteristicsManagement Performance.Firm CharacteristicsSmall and Medium-sized Firm

초록

Purpose – For small and medium sized firms, CEO characteristics are main factor influencing firms’ prosperity as well as performance. So it is quite natural that many people are interested in factors of CEO that matters. In this research, CEO characteristics in terms of capabilities and skill or special knowledge necessary to run the business are invested for manufacturing firms. Precedent studies reveal that CEO characteristics such as psychological factors including desire to succeed, tendency to take risks, personal factors including age, year of running business, and task related factors including managing capability, communication skills, network influence firm performance for manufacturing firms. However, these studies simply verify whether or not those factors affect firm’s managing performance. This study, however, goes further to investigate how is the affecting process from CEO’s capabilities and organization characteristics to firm’s core competence, and from core competence to advantages, and from advantages to managing performance. Research design, data, and methodology – We make a questionnaire and surveyed manufacturing firm CEO’s in Gyeonggi-do area. General characteristics analysis, factor analysis, regression analysis, and control effect analysis was conducted. SPSS 2.0 Win, version was used. Results – The CEO characteristics including basic capability, task capability, leadership, and organization characteristics affect core competence at the statistically significant level. And, core competence affect both price advantage and differentiation advantage at the significant level. Some unique finding is that while differentiation advantage affects both financial achievement and non-financial achievement, price advantage does not affect both financial and non-financial achievement. And firm characteristics mainly measured by CEO characteristics of skills has control effects on the trace from core competence to price advantage. Conclusions – For small and medium sized firms CEO characteristics is the most important factor influencing firm’s prosperity. For manufacturing firms, whether CEO has the skill or special knowledge to run the firm is critical factor. The study results show that CEO’s for manufacturing firms put importance on price and price advantage which seems to be familiar to them. However, the price advantage does not influential to financial and non-financial achievement. This result suggests that small and medium sized manufacturing firms’ CEO’s should make effort to improve other aspects of advantages to be more competitive.

Abstract

Purpose – For small and medium sized firms, CEO characteristics are main factor influencing firms’ prosperity as well as performance. So it is quite natural that many people are interested in factors of CEO that matters. In this research, CEO characteristics in terms of capabilities and skill or special knowledge necessary to run the business are invested for manufacturing firms. Precedent studies reveal that CEO characteristics such as psychological factors including desire to succeed, tendency to take risks, personal factors including age, year of running business, and task related factors including managing capability, communication skills, network influence firm performance for manufacturing firms. However, these studies simply verify whether or not those factors affect firm’s managing performance. This study, however, goes further to investigate how is the affecting process from CEO’s capabilities and organization characteristics to firm’s core competence, and from core competence to advantages, and from advantages to managing performance. Research design, data, and methodology – We make a questionnaire and surveyed manufacturing firm CEO’s in Gyeonggi-do area. General characteristics analysis, factor analysis, regression analysis, and control effect analysis was conducted. SPSS 2.0 Win, version was used. Results – The CEO characteristics including basic capability, task capability, leadership, and organization characteristics affect core competence at the statistically significant level. And, core competence affect both price advantage and differentiation advantage at the significant level. Some unique finding is that while differentiation advantage affects both financial achievement and non-financial achievement, price advantage does not affect both financial and non-financial achievement. And firm characteristics mainly measured by CEO characteristics of skills has control effects on the trace from core competence to price advantage. Conclusions – For small and medium sized firms CEO characteristics is the most important factor influencing firm’s prosperity. For manufacturing firms, whether CEO has the skill or special knowledge to run the firm is critical factor. The study results show that CEO’s for manufacturing firms put importance on price and price advantage which seems to be familiar to them. However, the price advantage does not influential to financial and non-financial achievement. This result suggests that small and medium sized manufacturing firms’ CEO’s should make effort to improve other aspects of advantages to be more competitive.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Barton, Leonard, D., "Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development", Strategic management journal, 13(S1), pp.111~125 (1992)
  2. Beard, D. W., "Corporate-level strategy, business-level strategy, and firm performance", Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), pp.663~688 (1981)
  3. Chang, S. J., "Global Strategic Management in the age of global competition" (2007), Pakyoung Publishing co
  4. 최병구, "가치창조를 위한 기업자원관리: 전사적자원관리 구현을 기반으로", 경영정보학연구, 10(3), pp.111~132 (2008), 한국경영정보학회
  5. 최경규, "중소기업의 ERP 도입이 업무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 중소기업연구, 27(4), pp.29~54 (2005), 한국중소기업학회
  6. 추승엽, "경영환경, 경쟁전략 및 기업 내부역량 간의 적합성이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 전략경영연구, 12(1), pp.101~126 (2009), 한국전략경영학회[DOI]
  7. Collis, D. J., "Competing on resources : strategy in the 1990s", Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp.118~128 (1995)
  8. Conant, J. S., "Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance : A multiple measures-based study", Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), pp.365~383 (1990)
  9. Dierickx, I., "ASSET STOCK ACCUMULATION AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: REPLY", Management Science, 35(12) (1989)
  10. Ghemawat, P., "Strategy and the Business Landscape" (2009), Prentice Hall
  11. 구정대, "기업의 핵심역량과 비재무적 및 재무적 경영성과간의 관계", 관광연구, 23(4), pp.259~277 (2009), 대한관광경영학회
  12. Grant, R. M., "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation", California Management Review, 33(3), pp.114~135 (1991)
  13. Gupta, A. K., "SBU strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation", The Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), pp.477~500 (1987)
  14. 곽기영, "중소기업 CEO 이슈리더십과 기업성과 간의 관계에서 CEO 역량의 조절효과 검증", 대한경영학회지, 29(2), pp.195~212 (2016), 대한경영학회[DOI]
  15. 한현정, "기업문화 유형이 재무성과에 미치는 영향 : 호텔 기업문화와 인지적 재무성과 측정을 중심으로", 호텔경영학연구, 20(1), pp.267~284 (2011), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  16. Hitt, M. A., "Relationships among corporate level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance", Journal of management studies, 23(4), pp.401~416 (1986)
  17. Jeon, J. Y., "A Study on the Effects of Family Restaurant`s Core Competency on the Organizational Effectiveness", Ph.D, pp.2011
  18. 정동열, "중소기업 특성화고졸 초기경력자의 경력몰입과 개인 및 조직 특성의 위계적 관계", 박사, 농산업교육과, pp.2014
  19. A Study on the Effects of First Mover Advantage and Competitive Advantage on Firm Performance in the Franchise Industry, "Jung, D. Y.", Korea Business Administration Society, 1~19 (2010)
  20. 정대용, "중소기업의 핵심역량 및 네트워킹 활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 - 한국기업가와 중국기업가의 네트워킹 특성을 중심으로 한 비교연구 -", 한국창업학회지, 3(2), pp.43~69 (2008), 한국창업학회[DOI]
  21. 정대용, "한․중 중소기업의 네트워킹이 지각된 기업성과에 미치는 관계 모형에 관한 실증적 비교분석", 국제경영리뷰, 13(2), pp.27~56 (2009), 한국국제경영관리학회
  22. 강석민, "기업가정신과 핵심역량이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 환경 불확실성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 마케팅논집(Journal of Marketing Studies), 20(1), pp.1~16 (2012), 한국전략마케팅학회[DOI]
  23. 김의하, "경영자원론에 입각한 경쟁전략에 관한 연구", 경상논총, 20(2), pp.65~82 (2002), 한독경상학회
  24. 권기환, "현대적 자원준거관점에 관한 이론적 고찰: 개념적 진화를 중심으로", Korea Business Review, 9(2), pp.215~244 (2006), 한국경영학회
  25. 권영철, "다국적기업 현지자회사의 동적역량: 결정요인과 성과", 경영학연구, 39(5), pp.1151~1175 (2010), 한국경영학회
  26. Kwon O. I., "Exploratory consideration of the relationship between small and medium-sized businesses, CEOs, Strategies, HRM, and the impact of consistency on performance", Conference of Korea integrated academic publication Proceedings, pp.1~19 (2007)
  27. Kim, C. G., "Core Competences for Sustaining Competitive Advantage", Community Development Review, 5(1), pp.265~278 (2005)
  28. Kim, M. K., "A Study on the Determinants of Leverage in Unlisted Small and Medium Enterprises", The Korean journal of financial management, 19(1), pp.33~66 (2002)
  29. 이재훈, "중소기업의 기술능력 보유, 경영자 특성 및 조직구조가 재무적 성과에 미치는 영향-우리나라 주물소재산업 사례-", 중소기업연구, 25(4), pp.79~112 (2003), 한국중소기업학회
  30. Lucia, A. D., "The art and science of competency models: Pinpointing critical success factors in organizations" (1999), Pfeiffer
  31. Mahoney, J. T., "The management of resources and the resource of management", Journal of business research, 33(2), pp.91~101 (1995)
  32. Makadok, R., "Toward a Synthesis of the Resources-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation", Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.387~401 (2001)
  33. 남외자, "호텔기업의 내부마케팅과 기업성과에 대한 경쟁전략의 매개효과", 호텔경영학연구, 18(3), pp.99~118 (2009), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  34. 노형진, "제조기업의 핵심역량 및 가치혁신전략이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(4), pp.155~161 (2012), 한국컴퓨터정보학회[DOI]
  35. 박철민, "영남지역 중소기업 최고경영자의 특성이경영성과에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 18(3), pp.1075~1101 (2005), 한국산업경제학회
  36. Park, G. S., "The study on the strategic resource effect on performance measure and firm’s performance", Journal of Tax and Accounting, 22, pp.75~94 (2008)
  37. 허진, "이력관리시스템 도입에 따른 식품업체 경영성과에관한 실증 연구", 외식경영연구, 14(1), pp.47~65 (2011), 한국외식경영학회
  38. 박상혁, "기업의 경쟁전략과 정보비중이 정보통신기술 이용에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 17(4), pp.1485~1508 (2004), 한국산업경제학회
  39. 박신윤, "중소기업 최고경영자의 역량모델 개발", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 43(1), pp.87~106 (2011), 한국농·산업교육학회[DOI]
  40. Human Resource Management by Capabilities, "Park, W. S.", Korea Labor Research Institute, ~ (2002)
  41. Porter, M. E., "Competitive strategy" (1980), Free Press
  42. Porter, M. E., "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" (1990), Free Press
  43. 서경화, "브랜드 확장에 따른 기업이미지가 서비스 품질, 확장 브랜드의 적합성, 태도에 미치는 영향 연구 : 외식 기업을 중심으로", 호텔경영학연구, 20(1), pp.69~92 (2011), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  44. 서경화, "외식기업의 경영자원이 경쟁전략 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 관광연구저널, 26(2), pp.279~296 (2012), 한국관광연구학회[DOI]
  45. 신진교, "중소기업의 조직특성과 기술상업화 : 내부 통합과 외부 네트워크의 조절효과", 인적자원관리연구, 15(2), pp.159~175 (2008), 한국인적자원관리학회
  46. 손은호, "핵심역량과 경쟁전략 간의 적합성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 - 호텔산업을 중심으로 -", 호텔경영학연구, 16(5), pp.93~111 (2007), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  47. Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp.509~533 (1997)
  48. Venkatraman, N., "Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research : A Comparison of Approaches", Academy of Management Review, 11(4), pp.801~814 (1986)
  49. Wernerfelt, B., "A resource‐based view of the firm", Strategic management journal, 5(2), pp.171~180 (1984)

관련 논문AI추천

중소기업의 핵심역량과 경쟁전략이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향배윤성, 이윤보, 이종덕한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2014 · 제9권 제3호중소기업 경영자의 기업가 특성이 성과에 미치는 영향박길호, 조준희한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2017 · 제12권 제1호기업 핵심역량 및 경쟁우위의 결정요인과 경영성과에 관한 연구: 중소·벤처기업을 중심으로문병준, 이상무경영경제연구소 · 경영경제연구2020 · 제42권 제4호서비스 중소기업 최고경영자의 심리적, 역량적, 리더십 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향정안자, 조예희, 최순권한국전문경영인학회 · 전문경영인연구2022 · 제25권 제4호생산 및 고객 특성별 중소 제조 기업의 핵심 역량 비교곽영환, 서창적, 이인태한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2013 · 제24권 제2호중소기업 최고경영자의 컨설턴트 역량이 기업의 혁신성과 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구권민희, 유연우, 이상복대한산업경영학회 · 산업융합연구2022 · 제20권 제11호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Development of Health Indices and Market Segmentation Strategies for Senior Health Services신정훈pp. 7-15A Study on the Use Intention of Xiaomi in Korean MarketJong-Ho Lee, Peng-Ru Jinpp. 17-24패션 소셜미디어 품질, 정보 이용행동, 구매의도 간 관계 연구김미숙, Nae-Eun Kimpp. 25-38BMO모형을 이용한 스타트업 기술사업화 성공요인 연구Jeong-Hui Han, Kwang-Dong Min, Moo-Yul Huhpp. 39-54선호 불일치 정보에 대한 반응에서 환경적 프라이드 유형의 역할최낙환pp. 55-66
원문 보기