본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Kano 모델 및 PCSI 지수를 활용한 종합건강검진 의료서비스 품질에 대한 실증적 연구

An Empirical Study of Comprehensive Health Screening Medical Service Quality with Kano Model and PCSI Index

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - This study aims to identify the priorities of medical service quality improvement by customer satisfaction characteristics and potential customer satisfaction improvement (PCSI) index based on the dualistic quality classification of Kano Model (1984) for Comprehensive Health Screeening Center in General Hospitals and Centers only for Comprehensive Health Screening and suggest a direction for future improvement. Research design, data, and methodology - Through advanced research on health screening medical service quality, this study set four service quality factors, including tangible, human, process and supportive factors, and 39 measurement items. Based on these items, the study used 117 questions, which consist of dualistic quality factors, customer satisfaction coefficients, positive and negative questions for PCSI index and questions for current satisfaction. 300 effective samples were collected for adults in their 20s who experienced health screening service in Seoul, Gyeonggi-do and Incheon within the past two years. Collected data were input in the quality evaluation duality table to categorize quality factors and calculate customer satisfaction coefficients by Timko(1993). The study also analyzed PCSI index in comparison with current satisfaction and identified priorities in quality improvement. Results - It was found that the most urgent factors to improve the quality in both groups were adequate waiting hours and emergency response for complications, which are process factors classified as unitary quality. It is urgently needed to improve the quality as the PCSI index was high in supportive factors (complaint response team) as attractive quality in Comprehensive Health Screening Center in General Hospitals and in process factors (prevention of infection) as unitary quality in Centers only for Comprehensive Health Screening. As the PCSI index was low in space use as a tangible factor, it was found that the current level can be maintained instead of improvement. Conclusions - To improve the health screening medical service quality, it is required to focus on process factors (adequate waiting hours, emergency response for complications, prevention of infection) and supportive factors (complaint response team) among service qualities perceived by users. It is proposed to ensure continuous efforts to manage and reinforce priorities as a direction for future improvement in health screening service.

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to identify the priorities of medical service quality improvement by customer satisfaction characteristics and potential customer satisfaction improvement (PCSI) index based on the dualistic quality classification of Kano Model (1984) for Comprehensive Health Screeening Center in General Hospitals and Centers only for Comprehensive Health Screening and suggest a direction for future improvement. Research design, data, and methodology - Through advanced research on health screening medical service quality, this study set four service quality factors, including tangible, human, process and supportive factors, and 39 measurement items. Based on these items, the study used 117 questions, which consist of dualistic quality factors, customer satisfaction coefficients, positive and negative questions for PCSI index and questions for current satisfaction. 300 effective samples were collected for adults in their 20s who experienced health screening service in Seoul, Gyeonggi-do and Incheon within the past two years. Collected data were input in the quality evaluation duality table to categorize quality factors and calculate customer satisfaction coefficients by Timko(1993). The study also analyzed PCSI index in comparison with current satisfaction and identified priorities in quality improvement. Results - It was found that the most urgent factors to improve the quality in both groups were adequate waiting hours and emergency response for complications, which are process factors classified as unitary quality. It is urgently needed to improve the quality as the PCSI index was high in supportive factors (complaint response team) as attractive quality in Comprehensive Health Screening Center in General Hospitals and in process factors (prevention of infection) as unitary quality in Centers only for Comprehensive Health Screening. As the PCSI index was low in space use as a tangible factor, it was found that the current level can be maintained instead of improvement. Conclusions - To improve the health screening medical service quality, it is required to focus on process factors (adequate waiting hours, emergency response for complications, prevention of infection) and supportive factors (complaint response team) among service qualities perceived by users. It is proposed to ensure continuous efforts to manage and reinforce priorities as a direction for future improvement in health screening service.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Basfirinci, C., "A Cross Cultural Investigation of Airlines Service Quality through Integration of SERVQUAL and the Kano Model", Journal of Air Transport Management, 42(1), pp.239~248 (2015)
  2. Brady, M. K., "Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality : A hierarchical approach", Journal of marketing, 65(3), pp.34~49 (2001)
  3. 최철재, "지각된 의료서비스 품질과 병원이미지 및 재방문의도 관계에서 신뢰의 조절효과", 병원경영학회지, 20(2), pp.57~71 (2015), 한국병원경영학회
  4. Chung, J. Y., "An evaluation research on the quality components for the service design of health screening: Focusing on KANO model", Doctorial, pp.2016
  5. Cronin, J. J. Jr., "Measuring service quality : A reexamination and extension", Journal of marketing, 56(3), pp.55~68 (1992)
  6. Dominici, G., "The Drivers of Customer Satisfaction for Academic Library Services Managerial Hints from an Empirical Study on Two Italian University Libraries using the Kano Model", International Journal of Management in Education, 9(3), pp.267~289 (2015)
  7. Gruber, T., "Analysing the Preferred Characteristics of Frontline Employees Dealing with Customer Complaints?: A Cross-National Kano Study", TQM Journal, 23(2), pp.128~144 (2011)
  8. 임복희, "건강검진 수검자의 의료기관내 검진센터 선택요인과 만족도", 디지털융복합연구, 12(12), pp.457~467 (2014), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  9. 강성욱, "민간검진 서비스의 이용 현황과 결정요인", 예방의학회지, 42(3), pp.177~182 (2009), 대한예방의학회
  10. Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Journal of The Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), pp.147~156 (1984)
  11. 김정희, "잠재적 고객만족개선 지수를 이용한 의료서비스 품질개선우선 순위 결정 - 일개 상급종합병원의 외래환자 및 근무자를 중심으로", 병원경영학회지, 20(2), pp.39~56 (2015), 한국병원경영학회
  12. 김상철, "Kano 모델 및 가중 PCSI를 통한 서비스품질 개선에 관한 연구", 유통과학연구, 8(4), pp.17~23 (2010), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  13. Sang-Oh Kim, "카노 모형을 이용한 모바일 쇼핑몰 앱의 서비스 품질 요인 분석에 관한 연구", 산경연구논집, 9(12), pp.63~72 (2018), 한국유통과학회
  14. 김유미, "일개 종합병원의 민간 건강검진 수검자의 검진이용 특성, 건강행태 및 건강관리 수준 분석", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 14(1), pp.301~311 (2013), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  15. 김용태, "종합검진센터의 이용편의성이 의료서비스가치, 만족도 및 브랜드충성도에 미치는 영향", 서비스경영학회지, 20(1), pp.223~245 (2019), 한국서비스경영학회[DOI]
  16. "Survey on customer satisfaction of comprehensive screenings" (2017)[URL]
  17. Lee, H. I., "A study on the effects of medial care service quality factor of medical examination center on service value, customer satisfaction and behavioral intention: Based on the Kano model", Doctorial, pp.2016
  18. 이진호, "방한 러시아 의료관광객이 지각하는 의료관광 서비스품질이 만족 및 행동의도에 미치는 영향", 관광연구저널, 28(7), pp.103~116 (2014), 한국관광연구학회
  19. SU HAIXIA, "Kano 모델 및 PCSI 지수를 활용한 O2O 서비스 품질에 대한 탐색적 연구: 중국 소비자를 중심으로", 디지털무역리뷰, 15(2), pp.1~21 (2017), 한국디지털무역연구소[DOI]
  20. Maciosek, M. V., "Priorities among effective clinical preventive services : Results of a systematic review and analysis", American journal of preventive medicine, 31(1), pp.52~61 (2006)
  21. Milutinović, D., "Assessment of quality of care in acute postoperative pain management", Vojnosanitetski pregled, 66(2), pp.156~162 (2009)
  22. Parasuraman, A., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", Journal of marketing, 49(4), pp.41~50 (1985)
  23. 박혜윤, "항공사의 유・무형, 인적서비스 품질요인이 재이용의도에 미치는 영향 : 항공사 브랜드 및 브랜드태도의 매개효과를 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 15(4), pp.59~67 (2017), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  24. 박일수, "민간검진이용자의 재검진 결정요인에 관한 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 13(1), pp.383~396 (2015), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  25. Rahmana, A., "Integration of SERVQUAL and Kano Model into QFD to Improve Quality of Simulation-Based Training on Project Management", International asic and Applied Science, 2(3), pp.59~72 (2014)
  26. Salehzadeh, R., "Is Organizational Citizenship Behavior an Attractive Behavior for Managers? : A Kano Model Approach", Journal of Management Development, 34(5), pp.601~620 (2015)
  27. Shahin. A., "Estimating Customer Lifetime Aalue for New Product Development Based on the Kano Model with a Case Study in Automobile Industry", Benchmarking : An International Journal, 22(5), pp.857~873 (2016)
  28. Shelton, P. J., "Measuring and improving patient satisfaction" (2000), Jones & Bartlett Learning
  29. Shin, Y. S., "Comparison of customer satisfaction with health examination programs provided by the Korea National Health Insurance and private healthcare organizations in Korea", Journal of Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care, 12(1), pp.40~51 (2006)
  30. Taifa, I. W., "Quality Function Deployment Integration with Kano Model for Ergonomic Product Improvement-A Review", Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2(9), pp.2284~2491 (2015)
  31. Timko, M., "An experiment in continuous analysis", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), pp.17~20 (1993)
  32. Walden, D., "Introduction to Kano’s methods", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), pp.3~7 (1993)
  33. 양희진, "국내 일부 3차 의료기관에서 실시하는 종합검진의 검사항목에 관한 근거 조사", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 27(9), pp.723~732 (2006), 대한가정의학회
  34. 여지영, "건강검진 수검의 결정요인 및 건강증진행위 변화 효과", 보건행정학회지, 22(1), pp.49~64 (2012), 한국보건행정학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)