경찰의 책임수사제와 자치경찰제
Relations between the responsible investigation system ?and local autonomous system of Police
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The responsible investigation system of police and local autonomous police system have been called two items of police-revolutions. These two systems affect each other positively or negatively. The responsible investigation system of police enforce power of police as well as need legal responsibility of police officers. On the other hand local autonomous police system result in decentralizing power of police as well as able to provide services of policing proper to local inhabitants. If these two systems could not be introduced at the same time, it is more effective and right to introduce the responsible investigation system of police first. Because The responsible investigation system of police affects lives of people in various sides. The responsible investigation system of police guarantees civil rights and conveniences of people. Through introducing the responsible investigation system of police, the self-esteem of police officers could be raised up and law-enforement of police could be more responsible. On these bases introducing local autonomous police system result in much more effects of police revolutions. After these revolutions of police system, we must make relations between prosecutors and police officers better. Now the prosecutor must supervise which investigation of police transgress the rules or not. But Korean prosecutor hold much power as investigation, directing police-investigation, prosecution and enforcement of criminal sanctions. As a result prosecutor can't direct police-investigation materially and check and balance between prosecutor and police can't act on. So it is reasonable that the police investigate independently and after police-investigation prosecutor supervise the unlawfulness of police-investigation. Through this system, prosecutor and police will be cleaned and improve certainty of crimes. It is so-called responsibility principle of investigation-police.
참고문헌 (23)
- "자치경찰제도’의 도입논의에 대한 비판적 고찰", 10(1) (2002)
- "자치경찰제 도입에 관한 법제적 고찰", 12. (2003), ~
- "자치경찰제의 핵심; 경찰중립화", 5 (2000)
- "수사권독립 논의의 본질과 문제점 경찰수사권독립의 요체는 견제와 균형", 2., ~
- 김충남, "자치경찰의 도입과 경찰의 수사권 독립" (2001), 한국경찰학회보 2001.
- 박기석, "현행 검경관계의 문제점과 경찰의 책임수사원리", 5(2) (2003)
- 서보학, "수사권의 독점 또는 배분?", 12 (1999)
- 서보학, "수사권의 중립을 위한 수사권의 합리적 배분", 8(4) (1999)
- "우리나라 지방자치경찰 도입 논의과정과 도입실패 요인", (202) (2005)
- 오창익, "수사지휘권과 인권보장 토론문", 15(1) (2003), 제15권 제1호
- "자치경찰제 도입시 예상되는 쟁점 및 고려사항" (2003)
- 이기호, "지방자치경찰제도의 도입에 관한 연구" (2001)
- 이상열, "박종구", 경찰부패의 영향요인에 관한 연구, 2004., pp.9(2), ~
- 이상원, "한국경찰의 자치경찰화를 위한 소고", (4) (1995)
- 이영란, "한국의 수사권체제", (7) (1995)
- 이존걸, "경찰의 수사권 독립방안" (2000)
- "한국의 자치체 경찰 도입에 따른 경찰 운영의 혁신적 변화 방안에 관한 연구", (7) (1997)
- "경찰지방자치의 본질과 당위의 관점에서 본 경찰자치제 정부안에 대한 검토", 7., pp.(586) (2005), ~
- "수사권독립론에 관한 연구" (2005)
- "지방분권과 자치경찰" (2004)
- "경찰수사권 독립이 인권보장의 첩경", 15(1) (2003)
- "범죄수사절차상 피의자의 인권침해 현황조사", 06. (2003), ~[DOI]
- "자치경찰제도 및 경찰의 수사권 독립 방향에 관한 소고", (42) (2003)
