經營執行機能 關聯 商法改正案의 主要內容 및 向後課題
The Corporate Law Amendment and the Problem to be solved in relation to the Role of Management Execution
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the amendment of the Korean Corporate Law, the definition of the outside directors, limitation of the liability of the director and officer try to be introduced. The outside director has been introduced to improve the manager-monitoring capability of corporate boards of directors since the financial and currency crisis in Korea. But there are several problem concerning the outside director in Korea. The most important thing is the independence of the outside director. The primary purpose of this study is to explain the contents of amendment of corporate law concerning the outside director and officer. The definition, qualifications, authority, duties, liabilities of officer and the definition of outside director are prescribed in the amendment of corporate law. The secondary purpose is to explain the problems to be solved in concerned with the outside director and officer. First, it is necessary to reenforce the supervisory role of the board of director. In Korea the roles of corporate boards in corporation have been changed and the outside directors, and audit committee have been introduced, finding out the necessity to pay attention to the independence of outside directors from the management. Second, it should be mandated to introduce the officer in large publicly held corporation if outside directors and audit committee should be introduced. De facto officer would be selected under the bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors in many publicly held corporation if the corporation may have officer under the amendment of corporate law. Third, The business judgment rule is a helpful description of a basic principle applicable to business decisions by boards of directors. By the application of that rule, the decisions made by the board of directors upon reasonable information and with some rationality do not give rise to directorial liability for many types of actions that turn out badly from the standpoint of the corporation. But the business judgment rule is not introduced in the corporate law. A lot of Korean corporations tries to be globalized in many aspects. Their management have discretionary authority in conducting domestic as well as international business. I think it is required to protect the management by the business judgment rule.
Abstract
In the amendment of the Korean Corporate Law, the definition of the outside directors, limitation of the liability of the director and officer try to be introduced. The outside director has been introduced to improve the manager-monitoring capability of corporate boards of directors since the financial and currency crisis in Korea. But there are several problem concerning the outside director in Korea. The most important thing is the independence of the outside director. The primary purpose of this study is to explain the contents of amendment of corporate law concerning the outside director and officer. The definition, qualifications, authority, duties, liabilities of officer and the definition of outside director are prescribed in the amendment of corporate law. The secondary purpose is to explain the problems to be solved in concerned with the outside director and officer. First, it is necessary to reenforce the supervisory role of the board of director. In Korea the roles of corporate boards in corporation have been changed and the outside directors, and audit committee have been introduced, finding out the necessity to pay attention to the independence of outside directors from the management. Second, it should be mandated to introduce the officer in large publicly held corporation if outside directors and audit committee should be introduced. De facto officer would be selected under the bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors in many publicly held corporation if the corporation may have officer under the amendment of corporate law. Third, The business judgment rule is a helpful description of a basic principle applicable to business decisions by boards of directors. By the application of that rule, the decisions made by the board of directors upon reasonable information and with some rationality do not give rise to directorial liability for many types of actions that turn out badly from the standpoint of the corporation. But the business judgment rule is not introduced in the corporate law. A lot of Korean corporations tries to be globalized in many aspects. Their management have discretionary authority in conducting domestic as well as international business. I think it is required to protect the management by the business judgment rule.
참고문헌 (57)
- 이기수, "회사법(상법강의Ⅱ)" (2002), 박영사
- 이기수, "증권거래법(전정판)" (2003), 세창출판사
- 임홍근, "현대회사법" (2001), 법문사
- 정동윤, "회사법" (2001), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2007), 박영사
- 강희갑, "미국법상의 집행임원제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 7(2) (2000), 한국비교사법학회
- 김택주, "경영판단의 원칙의 적용요건", 기업법연구, 20(1) (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 김화진, "사외이사의 독립성에 관한 미국 델라웨어주의 오라클 판결", BFL, (3) (2004), 서울대학교금융법센타
- 박명서, "경영판단의 원칙", 기업법연구, 통권 : 17 (2004), 한국기업법학회
- 백정웅, "오라클 사건 -독립이사에 대한 독립성 판단의 상황적 특징-", 기업법연구, 19(4), pp.169~196 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 양동석, "임원제도도입에 따른 법적 문제", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 양동석, "집행임원의 역할과 법적 지위", 상장협, (48) (2003), 한국상장회사협의회
- 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개", 상사법연구, 24(1) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 염미경, "사외이사의 효율적 활용방안-사외이사의 독립성 확보를 위한 기관투자가의 역할을 중심으로-", 상사법연구, 23(1) (2004), 한국상사법학회
- 유진희, "우리나라 기업지배구조 개혁의 성과와 과제", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 유진희, "세계화와 회사법 in:세계화 시대의 법과 한국법의 발전" (2005), 고려대학교 법과대학
- 이기수, "사외이사제도의 강화를 둘러싼 쟁점", 상사법연구, 9(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
- 이기수, "한국의 기업지배구조개선을 위한 제언", 고려법학, (41) (2003), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 이대희, "사외이사의 역할에 대한 경험적인 연구의 고찰", 상사법 연구, 16(2) (1997), 한국상사법학회
- 이욱래, "적대적 M&A에 대응한 이사의 방어행위에 대한 법적 평가", BFL, (12) (2005), 서울대학교금융법센타
- 이형규, "사외이사제도의 개선방안" (2002), 한국상장회사협의회
- 임중호, "상법 일부개정법률안 검토보고" (2007), 국회법제사법위원회
- 정찬형, "IMF 경제체제 이후 회사지배구조에 관한 상법개정에 대한 평가", 현대상사법논집(강희갑박사 화갑논문집) (2001)
- 정찬형, "주식회사의 지배구조와 권한의 분배", 상사판례연구, 통권 : 16 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
- 정찬형, "한국 주식회사에서의 집행임원에 관한 연구", 고려법학, (43) (2004), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 정찬형, "주식회사의 지배구조에 관한 상법개정의 방향", 2005년 추계학술대회 자료집 (2005), 한국경영법률학회
- 정쾌영, "사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방향", 기업법연구, 20(2) (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 차대운, "집행임원제도의 도입 필요성과 입법론적 과제", 상장협, (49) (2004), 한국상장회사협의회
- 최병규, "미국법상의 경영판단의 원칙과 우리나라에의 도입가능성", 안암법학, (12) (2000), 안암법학회
- 최병규, "경영판단의 원칙과 그의 수용방안", 기업법연구, 19(2) (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 최완진, ""상법 개정안에 관한 비판적 고찰", 한국경영법률학회 추계학술발표회 자료집(40회), 2006", ~ (2006)
- 최준선, "회사법 개정방향에 관한 연구", 상장협연구보고서 (2004), 한국상장회사협의회
- 홍복기, "사외이사제도의 정착과 활성화", 상장협, (춘계) (1998), 한국상장회사협의회
- 홍복기, "이사회와 그 위원회", 상장협, (39) (1999), 한국상장회사협의회
- 금융감독원, "미국에서의 기업지배구조 개선동향" (2004)
- 금융감독원, "금융회사의 사외이사제도 운영실태 서베이 분석결과 보고" (2004)
- 법무부, "상법(회사편)개정 공청회" (2006)
- 전국경제인연합회, "“주식회사 임직원 직명 경제계 권고안”, 1998년 전경련 사업총람, 1998", ~ (1998)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "2005년도 주권상장법인 경영인 현황" (2005)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "집행임원제도의 법제화에 관한 의견" (2005)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사 직무수행 표준모델과 운영실제" (2006)
- Charles R. O'Kelley, "Corporations and Other Business Associations" (1996), Little, Brown and Company
- James D. Cox, "Corporations" (2003)
- Joel Seligman, "Corporations (Cases and Materials)" (1995), Brown and Company
- Robert W. Hamilton, "The Law of Corporations" (2000), West Group
- James D. Cox, "Lessons from Enron, How did corporate and securities law fail? Managing and monitoring conflicts of interest: Empowering the outside directors with independent counsel, 48 Vill. L. Rev. 1077, 2003", ~ (2003)
- Lyman P.Q. Johnson, "Recalling why corporate officers are fiduciaries, 46 Wm & Mary L. Rev. 1597, 2005", ~ (2005)
- Lawrence A. Hamermesh, "Corporate officers and the business judgment rule: A reply to professor Johnson", The Business Lawyer, 60 (2005)
- Lyman P.Q. Johnson, "Corporate officers and the business judgment rule", The Business Lawyer, 60 (2005)
- Lynne L. Dallas, "The Multiple Roles of Corporate Boards of Directors, 40 San Diego L. Rev.781, 2003", ~ (2003)
- Robert W. Hamilton, "Corporate Governance in America 1950-2000: Major Changes But Uncertain Benefits, 25 Iowa J. Corp. L. 2000", ~ (2000)
- 西山忠範, "現代企業の支配構造" (1975), 有斐閣
- 前田庸, "會社法入門" (1999), 有斐閣
- 河本一郞, "現代會社法" (1999), 商事法務硏究會
- 近藤光男, "執行役", 民商法誌, (4,5) (2002)
- 石山卓磨, "“日本における執行役員制度と監査役”, 「21세기의 기업지배구조」, 대한상공회의소ㆍ성균관대학교 비교법연구소, 1999", ~ (1999)
- 永井和之, "일본에서의 최근 회사법의 개정동향 in: 한?중?일에서의 최근 회사법의 개정동향" (2005), 고려대학교 법학연구원