스팸메일의 규제동향에 관한 고찰

키워드

참고문헌 (83)

1. "개인정보보호" (2001), 사이버출판사
2. "2002 개인정보보호백서" (2003), 한국정보보호진흥원
3. "해외 스팸규제 법령현황" (2003)
4. "스팸메일에 대한 각국의 법 ㆍ 제도적 대응", 4(2) (2002), 중앙법학회
5. "스팸메일 규제에 관한 현황" (2002)
6. "스팸메일-정보인가 법적규율의 대상인가", 1 (2002), 인터넷법연구 제1권
7. "원하지않는 전자우편에 대한 법적ㆍ기술적 접근", (7) (2001)
8. "인터넷과 인권", (13) (2002)
9. "효율적인 스팸메일 규제방안 도입에 관한 연구" (2004)
10. "스팸메일에대한 Opt-In 규제방식에 관한 소고", 14(2) (2004)
11. "스팸메일에 관한 합리적인 규제방안", 2(2) (2002)
12. "메일어드레스를 사칭한 스팸메일의 규제에 관한 소고", (19) (2003)
13. "스팸메일?방지 정책 현황" (2004), 정보통신정책동향
14. "스팸메일의 불편비용 추정", 10(1) (2003), 정보통신정책학회
15. "미국에서의 스팸메일 규제의 동향", (14) (2002)
16. "스팸메일의 법률적 규제", 7 (2001)
17. "원하지 않은 전자우편광고의 규제", (14) (2002)
18. "2002년 개정정보통신망법에 의한 스팸규제의 내용과 그 한계" (2003), 한국인터넷학회
19. "스팸메일규제에 관한 법적 고찰", (6) (2004)
20. "전자우편을 위한 광고의 문제점" (2002), 한국법제연구원
21. "전자거래에 있어서 개인정보침해에 대한 법적 구제", (10) (2002)
22. "전자상업광물인 스팸메일의 법적문제점과 그 해결방안", 19(2) (2000)
23. "불법스팸의 문제점과 법제적 대응방안", 32(2) (2003)
24. "스팸메일에 대한 법적고찰", 1(1) (2002), 한국정보보호진흥원
25. "스팸메일의 법적규제에 관한 고찰" (2002)
26. "미국에서의 인터넷과 관련된 판례 및 입법의 동향", (566) (2005)
27. "미국 스팸메일 규제의 최근 동향", (559) (2004)
28. "불법 스팸대응센터, 스팸메일방지가이드라인, http:", indexb_92.html, 2003.8
29. "‘연락처 없는 스팸메일 발송자 형사처벌’", 조선일보 2002.1. 27일 사회면
30. ", 商用電子ダイレクトメ-ルに對する法的規制-米國におけるスパムの法的規制を中心に(上)(下) N B L" (1998), 商事法務硏究會
31. "迷惑 メ-ルヘの對應の在り方に關する硏究會 中間取りまとめ", 迷惑メ-ルヘの對應の在り方に關する硏究會
32. "http:", security, pp.isg, virus.html
33. "http:", spamxiaolun.html
34. "Legal and Practical Look at the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003" (2004)
35. "Has the U.S. Canned Spam?", 263 (2004)
36. "Model Legislation to Control Junk E-mail" (1999)
37. "Cyberlaw: State Internet Regulation and the Dormant Commerce Clause" (2002)
38. "Forgery in Cyberspace The Sppootf Could be on You!" (2004)
39. "Marketing Privacy" (2003)
40. Peter Briden, "The Dark Side of Internet E mail" (2002)
41. "Issue Brief" (2002)
42. "A Further Darkside to Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail? An Assessment of Potential Employer Liability for Spam E-Mail" (2003)
43. "An Architecture for Spam Regulation", pp.57~ (2004)
44. "Screen-Scrapping and Harmful Cybertrespass after Intel" (2004)
45. "Whether ″Anti-Spam″Laws Violate the First Amendment" (2001)
46. "Firms Scramble in Face of Spam Law There's Little Time to Tweak Marketing" (2003), Dec. 29
47. "Commercialism and the Downfall of Internet Self Governance An Application of Antitrust Law" (1997)
48. "The Marketing of Legal Services on the Internet and the Model Rules", pp.17~ (2004)
49. "Peer Production of Internet Gevernance" (2004)
50. "An Economic Analysis of Spam Law" (2004)
51. "Trespass to Chattels and a Doctrine of Cyber-Nuisance" (2004)
52. "″Anti-Spam Laws Force Emerging Internet Business Advertisers to Wear the Scarlet ″S" (2003)
53. "An Economic Analysis of Spam Law" (2004)
54. "Who Controls the Internet? States' Rights and the Reawakening of the Dormant Commerce Clause" (2000)
55. "Electronic Commerce in the 21st Century" (2001)
56. "The Law Regulating Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail: An International Perspective" (2003)
57. "Why the CAN SPAM Act Is a Futile Waste of Time and Money", pp.31~177 (2004)
58. "How States Can Stay Relecant in the Fight Against Unwanted Messages", and is(t preempted) (2003), Matthew B. Prince & Patrick A. Shea
59. "The Indecency of Unsolicited Sexually Explicit Email A Comment on the Protection of Free Speech v. The Protection of Children" (2002)
60. "New Federal Law to Take Effect" (2003)
61. "Eliminating the Spam from Your Internet Diet The Possible Effects of the Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2001 on Junk E-Mail", pp.35~ (2004)
62. "Spam Legislation in the United States" (2003)
63. "Technical and Legal Approaches to Unsolicited Electronic Mail", 325 (2001)
64. "Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991" (1997)
65. "Revocation of an Internet Domain Name for Violations of ″Netiquette″" (1997)
66. "Spam after CAN-SPAM How Inconsistent Thinking Has Made a Hash out of Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail Policy" (2004)
67. "Good Laws for Junk Fax? Government Regulation of Unsolicited Solicitations" (2004)
68. "Unsolicited Communication in the Marketplace of Ideas", l. re 1314 (2005)
69. "Constitutional Law--Dormant Commerce Clause--Washington Supreme Court Upholds State Anti-Spamming Law--Washington v. Heckel", l. re 931, pp.243~404 (2002)
70. "Trespass to Chattels and the Internet: Intel Corp. v. Hamidi", j. l. & tech. 283 (2003)
71. "Technology and Realted Law" (2000)
72. "LLC v. lronPort System" (2004)
73. "Ggillman v.Sprint Communications Co" (2004)
74. "LLC v. University of Texas at Austin" (2004)
75. "Kaufman v. ACS Systems, lnc" (2003)
76. "Aronson v. Bright-Teeth Now" (2003)
77. "Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. American Blast Fax, lnc" (2003)
78. "Verizon Online Services, lnc. v. Ralsky" (2002)
79. "Ferguson v. Friendfinders" (2002)
80. "State v. Van$ Money Pie" (1998)
81. "CompuServe v. Cyber Promotions"
82. "Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. FCC" (1995), Ltd. v. FCC
83. "Other collections of spam cases"

관련 논문AI추천