본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

리스금융에 있어서 리스물건의 하자담보책임에 관한 연구

A Study on the Responsibility for Warranty of Lease Materials in Lease Finance

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Lease agreement is similar with rental agreement in terms of form but the essence is material finance. Lease companies have no professional knowledge on the quality and performance of lease materials, do not participate in selecting lease materials or suppliers, and do not participate in delivery of lease materials. Lease companies are not opposed by lease users for lease fare reduction request due to defects in relation to lease fare request right like the standpoint of banks in case of bank loans and need to certainly collect the invested fund. In such aspect, lease companies set an exemption clause in the lease agreement and this seems to be reasonable. And then, a problem comes into the fore that how, to whom, and on what background the lease user may ask for the responsibility for warranty in case of defects with the lease material. Although there is no formal agreement between lease users and suppliers but, when the concluding process of lease transactions is considered, substantial roles of both parties exist. Therefore, the lease agreement concluded between lease companies and lease users and the sales agreement concluded between lease companies and supplies are not independent ones but have mutual relationship. Therefore, as it is deemed that a kind of legal relationship called “lease transaction” is established, it would make the adjustment of the interests generated between lease transaction parties further easy to understand the concrete relationship as third-party relationship with the concept that lease transactions are third-party agreements. Therefore, as the relationship between lease companies and lease users is deemed as the relationship of special loan for consumption having the property to provide finance and as the relationship between lease users and suppliers is understood to be substantial transaction parties, it would be reasonable and meet the actual state to establish a theory so that lease users may ask the supplier for the responsibility for the defects of lease materials. Accordingly, in case of the revised bill of Commercial Law, the concrete content of defect warranty responsibility for lease materials, in the relationship between basic rights and liabilities of lease agreement parties, should be included with reflection of such aspect.

Abstract

Lease agreement is similar with rental agreement in terms of form but the essence is material finance. Lease companies have no professional knowledge on the quality and performance of lease materials, do not participate in selecting lease materials or suppliers, and do not participate in delivery of lease materials. Lease companies are not opposed by lease users for lease fare reduction request due to defects in relation to lease fare request right like the standpoint of banks in case of bank loans and need to certainly collect the invested fund. In such aspect, lease companies set an exemption clause in the lease agreement and this seems to be reasonable. And then, a problem comes into the fore that how, to whom, and on what background the lease user may ask for the responsibility for warranty in case of defects with the lease material. Although there is no formal agreement between lease users and suppliers but, when the concluding process of lease transactions is considered, substantial roles of both parties exist. Therefore, the lease agreement concluded between lease companies and lease users and the sales agreement concluded between lease companies and supplies are not independent ones but have mutual relationship. Therefore, as it is deemed that a kind of legal relationship called “lease transaction” is established, it would make the adjustment of the interests generated between lease transaction parties further easy to understand the concrete relationship as third-party relationship with the concept that lease transactions are third-party agreements. Therefore, as the relationship between lease companies and lease users is deemed as the relationship of special loan for consumption having the property to provide finance and as the relationship between lease users and suppliers is understood to be substantial transaction parties, it would be reasonable and meet the actual state to establish a theory so that lease users may ask the supplier for the responsibility for the defects of lease materials. Accordingly, in case of the revised bill of Commercial Law, the concrete content of defect warranty responsibility for lease materials, in the relationship between basic rights and liabilities of lease agreement parties, should be included with reflection of such aspect.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 김성태, "리스계약(lease contract), 고시계 통권 제339호, 1985.5", ~ (1985)
  2. 문기호, "리스물건의 하자담보책임", 기업법연구, 통권 : 3 (1998), 한국기업법학회
  3. 박영우, "외국의 리스판례(Ⅲ)-독일?일본을 중심으로-", 리스금융, 7(1) (1997)
  4. 소건영, "리스거래법론" (1997), 법문사
  5. 조용호, "리스회사의 하자담보책임", 리스금융, 6(3) (1996)
  6. 織田博子, "フランスのリ-ス取引法 in: リ-ス取引法講座(上)", 金融商事判例, (451) (1988), 金融財政事情硏究會
  7. 伊藤進, "リ-ス契約の內容上の主問題", 金融法務事情, (1130)
  8. 吉原省三, "判例リ-ス?クレジット取引法" (1986), 金融財政事情硏究會
  9. "壓政志 in: リ-スの實務知識" (1982), 商事法務硏究會
  10. 松田安定, "リ-スの理論と實務" (1987), 商事法務硏究會
  11. "幾代 通, リ-ス取引をめぐる解釋問題(その-)-內部關係, 私法 38號(日本私法學會)", ~
  12. "米倉 明, 別冊 NBL 11號 座談會 發言", ~
  13. "Addressograph- Multigraph inc, v. zinc, 273Md. 277, 329 A. 2d 28(1974)", ~ (1974)
  14. Canaris, "Bankvertragsrecht" (1981), HGB GroBkom
  15. Douglas J. Whaley, "Sale & Leases of Goods", Gilbert Law Summeries
  16. "Esser", Weyers, Schuldrecht 2, 5Aufl., 1977, 1977
  17. "Flume, DB 1972", ~ (1972)
  18. Gerhard Stoppok, "Leasing von beweglichen Wirtschaftsg?ern aus rechtlicher Sicht,젨젨젨젨젨 Leasing-Handbuch, 5Aufl.(Frankfurt, Fritz Knapp, 1988)", ~ (1988)
  19. Gieger, "Der Leasingvertrag" (1977), Bern
  20. "Plathe, Die rechtilche Beurteilung des Leasing-Gesch?ts, Diss. Kiel.,1969", ~ (1969)
  21. "World Wide Lease Inc. v. Grobschmit, 21 wash. App. 536, 586 P. 2d 889(1978)", ~ (1978)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)