본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

東醫壽世保元「性命論」天人性命 구조 속에서의 心慾論

Theories on the Covetous Desire in the Quaternary Paradigm of Heaven-Human-Nature-Course within 『Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論)』

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

1. Objectives This research aims to study the general overview of the theories on the covetous desire and the relevant theories on cultivation mentioned in Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論). 2. Methods The theories concerning the covetous desire introduced in Dong-Mu's manuscripts, including Gyukchigo 格致藁), Yougocho (遺稿抄), Dongmuyougo (東武遺稿) and Jaejungsinpyun (濟衆新編), were comprehensively reviewed. Furthermore, the significance of the theories on the covetous desire and the relevant theories on self-cultivation were studied within the context of Donguisusebowon(東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論). 3. Results and Conclusions 1) Among the four covetous desires (selfishness (私心), indiscretion (放心), indolence(逸心), acquisitiveness (慾心)), selfishness and acquisitiveness are the interpersonal components that deal with the relationship between individuals, whereas indiscretion and indolence are the intra-personal or self-concerned components that deal with the internal desires within the individual. 2) In the early concepts on the quaternity explaining the perspective on the human being as introduced in Dongmu's earlier manuscripts, the four covetous desires are thought of as the most important etiological components, that are also intimately related to the theories of self-cultivation. 3) Among the concepts introduced in Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論), viciousness (邪心) and negligence (怠心) are primary, intra-personal (self-concerned) desires that are henceforth matched to indiscretion and indolence, respectively, while selfishness (arrogance, assertiveness, indiscrimination and exaggeration (驕矜伐夸)) and acquisitiveness (violation, extravagance, slothfulness and stealthiness(奪侈懶竊)) are secondary, interpersonal desires. 4) ‘Preserving the mind (存其心)’ and ‘rectifying the body (修其身)’ are methods of overcoming viciousness (indiscretion) and negligence (indolence), the intrapersonal desires, while ‘nurturing the nature (養其性)’ and ‘propping the course (立其命)’ are methods of eliminating selfishness and acquisitiveness, the interpersonal desires, which ultimately each leads to the completion of Nature (性) and Conduct/Course (命).

Abstract

1. Objectives This research aims to study the general overview of the theories on the covetous desire and the relevant theories on cultivation mentioned in Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論). 2. Methods The theories concerning the covetous desire introduced in Dong-Mu's manuscripts, including Gyukchigo 格致藁), Yougocho (遺稿抄), Dongmuyougo (東武遺稿) and Jaejungsinpyun (濟衆新編), were comprehensively reviewed. Furthermore, the significance of the theories on the covetous desire and the relevant theories on self-cultivation were studied within the context of Donguisusebowon(東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論). 3. Results and Conclusions 1) Among the four covetous desires (selfishness (私心), indiscretion (放心), indolence(逸心), acquisitiveness (慾心)), selfishness and acquisitiveness are the interpersonal components that deal with the relationship between individuals, whereas indiscretion and indolence are the intra-personal or self-concerned components that deal with the internal desires within the individual. 2) In the early concepts on the quaternity explaining the perspective on the human being as introduced in Dongmu's earlier manuscripts, the four covetous desires are thought of as the most important etiological components, that are also intimately related to the theories of self-cultivation. 3) Among the concepts introduced in Donguisusebowon (東醫壽世保元): Theories on Nature and Conduct (性命論), viciousness (邪心) and negligence (怠心) are primary, intra-personal (self-concerned) desires that are henceforth matched to indiscretion and indolence, respectively, while selfishness (arrogance, assertiveness, indiscrimination and exaggeration (驕矜伐夸)) and acquisitiveness (violation, extravagance, slothfulness and stealthiness(奪侈懶竊)) are secondary, interpersonal desires. 4) ‘Preserving the mind (存其心)’ and ‘rectifying the body (修其身)’ are methods of overcoming viciousness (indiscretion) and negligence (indolence), the intrapersonal desires, while ‘nurturing the nature (養其性)’ and ‘propping the course (立其命)’ are methods of eliminating selfishness and acquisitiveness, the interpersonal desires, which ultimately each leads to the completion of Nature (性) and Conduct/Course (命).

참고문헌 (10)

  1. Jang HJ, "A Study on the Composition of Dokhaenpuun and the Knowledge and Deed", J Sasang Constitut Med, 3(1), pp.23~34 (1991)
  2. Kim JW, "Consideration on Lee Je-ma's Dokhaenpyun", J Sasang Constitut Med, 6(1), pp.1994~ (1994)
  3. Yoon DY, "The study on Bi-Bak-Tam-Ra'Ja in Dokhaenpyun", J Sasang Constitut med, 8(1) (1996)
  4. Son SK, "A Bibliographic Study on the Nature and the Emotion of Confucian and the Nature Qi and Emotion Qi of Lee Jae-Ma", J Sasang Constitut Med, 8(2), pp.11~40 (1996)
  5. Lee SK, "A Bibliographic study on Formation Process of Sasang Constitutional Medicine", J Sasang Constitut Med, 10(1), pp.41~54 (1998)
  6. Hwang MW, "A Study on Inclination of Mind and Nature & Emotion of Sasang Constitutional Medicine", J Sasang Constitut Med, 16(2), pp.17~31 (2004)
  7. 이준희, "東武 性情論 再考", 사상체질의학회지, 21(2), pp.11~26 (2009), 사상체질의학회
  8. Lee JM, "Gyukchigo" (1940), Duckhung publishing
  9. 경희대학교 한의과대학 사상체질과, "사상체질과 임상편람 제2권" (2010), 한미의학
  10. Lee JM, "Donguisusebowon" (1998), Daesung publishing

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)