십계명(출 20:1-17)의 중(中)·한(韓) 성서 비교 연구
A Comparative Study of Chinese and Korean Bible Translations of the Decalogue(Exo. 20:1-17)
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 십계명(출 20:1-17)에 대한 중국어 성서와 한국어 성서 번역의 차이점과 공통점을 비교 분석하고자 한다. 십계명 번역과 관련하여 가장 논쟁적인 주제는 ‘하나님 칭호’이다. 히브리어 ‘엘로힘’(~yhil{a/)은 번역본에 따라 신(神), 천주(天主), 상제(上帝), 하나님으로, ‘야웨’(hw"hy>)는 여호와(耶和华), 상주(上主), 주(主), 여호와로 번역되었다.
Abstract
This study will focus on the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments played an important role in the translation process of the Chinese Bible and Korean Bible. When there was not active in the mission using texts, the Ten Commandments were loved by many Christians as the favorite text expressing their rule of Christian life. I will compare the Ten Commandments in various Chinese Bible versions and Korean Bible versions to see how the interpretation was made. Their interpretation was dynamic by time periods, characters, or translation rules. The original meaning of the Ten Commandments was also differently applied in East Asian culture. I will study the different understanding of the words in various versions. Moreover, my focus will be on the differences between the Chinese Bible and the Korean Bible. As a Chinese scholar, it is meaningful to study the comparison of the versions in the different intentions. The question of how the Korean Bible accepted the Chinese Bible is also important for the Korean scholars. The first through fourth commandments show many variations among the Bible versions; there are not specific differences in the fifth through tenth commandments in relation to human life. The first part overall has longer sentences than the others, and the difficult theological concepts and interpretations typically made for different interpretations. There is a saying that the work of the translation of the Bible is adventure and treason. The language differences exist in all the translation tasks and no one can stop changes. The changes and editorial works are so important as these tasks provide continuous extensions of the Bible. There will be no exact word in the translation process. Translators just seek to find a most preferable word. This process was the same in the translation from Hebrew to Greek. There would be additions and subtractions, even alterations. The coherences and discords in this process may be natural. Rather, the translators should consider which words were most comparable to their society. Whenever the Bible is translated into other versions, there will be an effort to find the possibility from the impossibility.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김병철, "韓國近代飜譯文學史硏究" (1975), 은유문화사
- 김봉희, "국역성서의 서지학적 고찰", 석사, 도서관학, pp.1979
- 김양선, "성서한국" (1956)
- 김이곤, "출애굽기의 신학" (1989), 한국신학연구소
- 마틴 노트, "출애굽기" (1981), 한국신학연구소
- 존 더햄, "출애굽기" (2000), 솔로몬
- 민영진, "성서번역에서 언어‧윤리‧권력: 남기고 가는 문제", 구약논단, 24(3), pp.21~52 (2018), 한국구약학회[DOI]
- 민영진, "한국어 번역 성경에 나타난 중국어 성경과 일본어 성경의 비교", 성경원문 연구, 19, pp.176~199 (2006)
- 朴贊旭, "開化期 漢文聖書의 번역문학적 硏究", 석사, pp.1988
- 방정열, "히브리 시의 평행법과 한글번역: 한계와 여지(餘地)", 구약논단, 24(3), pp.107~139 (2018), 한국구약학회[DOI]
- 이희승, "국어대사전" (1961), 민중서림
- 정중호, "18세기 이전 중국과 한국의 십계명 번역과 해석의 역사", 구약논단, 19(4), pp.318~347 (2013), 한국구약학회[DOI]
- 차준희, "출애굽기 다시보기" (2004), 프리칭아카데미
- 채홍식, "십계명의 종교-사회사적 고찰", 구약신학저널, 2, pp.136~154 (2000)
- 테렌스 E. 프레다임, "출애굽기. 현대성서주석" (2001), 한국장로교출판사
- 한글학회, "큰 사전" (1957), 을유문화사
- 하성래, "정약전의 십계명가(十誡命歌)와 이벽의 천주공경가(天主恭敬歌)(Ⅰ)", 神學展望, (21), pp.136~154 (1973)
- Childs, B. S., "The Book of Exodus. The Old Testament Library, Philadelphia" (1974), The Westminster Press
- Fichtner, J., "Wort und Dienst 4", pp.23~52 (1955), Verlagshandlung der Anstalt Bethel
- Knierim, R., "Das Erste Gebot", ZAW, 77, pp.20~39 (1965)
- Nielsen, E., "The Ten Commandments in New Perspective" (1968), SCM Press
- Sarna, N. M., "Exodus" (1991), The Jewish Publication Society
- Willi-Plein, Ina, "Das Buch vom Auszug: 2. Mose (Exodus)" (1988), Neukirchener Verlag
- Zimmerli, W., "Gottes Offenbarung", pp.11~40 (1969), Chr. Kaiser Verlag
- 尤思德, (2002), 國際聖經協會
