A Historical and Social Interpretation of Low Trust in Italy and Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Trust is now considered an important basis for democratization and social and economic development, and the basis of social capital. However, southern Italy and Korea are classified as low trust societies, due to social problems such as organized crime, nepotism, and lack of cooperation. How can we explain the low trust in southern Italy and Korea? We find some similarities in colonial domination Spanish rule in southern Italy and Japanese rule in Korea. As the Hapsburgs and the Bourbons promoted mutual distrust in the south of Italy, Japanese colonial domination resulted in malicious distrust in Korean society. The “divide and rule” policy of the Spanish autocracy was not different from that of the Japanese colonial government. The Confucian tradition of trust was marred by Japanese colonial policy that was based on the oppression and exploitation of the Korean people. After Korea became a colony of Japan, the Korean tradition of community was intentionally destroyed by the Japanese colonial government. After liberation Korea experienced continuous social turmoil such as the migration of farmers to urban areas, the emergence of industrial workers, and rapid urbanization. The military coup of 1961 and the military rule that ensued imply a continuation of a hierarchical society based on public demonstrations of violence. When the violence of Japanese colonial rule disappeared, a new violent military rule surged in its place. However, when we explain the problem of distrust in the south of Italy with the tradition of the Norman dynasty’s authoritarian state and the Spanish autocracy, we have to figure out how medieval traditions influence the realities of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It can be a dangerous historical leap. It is difficult to refer all kinds of social problems to the colonial experience of Japanese imperialism. It is also not proper to conclude that trust is the source of all kinds of virtues and distrust all kinds of social diseases. We need to draw cautious conclusions on the colonial experience as the origin of the lack of trust in the societies of southern Italy and Korea.
Abstract
Trust is now considered an important basis for democratization and social and economic development, and the basis of social capital. However, southern Italy and Korea are classified as low trust societies, due to social problems such as organized crime, nepotism, and lack of cooperation. How can we explain the low trust in southern Italy and Korea? We find some similarities in colonial domination Spanish rule in southern Italy and Japanese rule in Korea. As the Hapsburgs and the Bourbons promoted mutual distrust in the south of Italy, Japanese colonial domination resulted in malicious distrust in Korean society. The “divide and rule” policy of the Spanish autocracy was not different from that of the Japanese colonial government. The Confucian tradition of trust was marred by Japanese colonial policy that was based on the oppression and exploitation of the Korean people. After Korea became a colony of Japan, the Korean tradition of community was intentionally destroyed by the Japanese colonial government. After liberation Korea experienced continuous social turmoil such as the migration of farmers to urban areas, the emergence of industrial workers, and rapid urbanization. The military coup of 1961 and the military rule that ensued imply a continuation of a hierarchical society based on public demonstrations of violence. When the violence of Japanese colonial rule disappeared, a new violent military rule surged in its place. However, when we explain the problem of distrust in the south of Italy with the tradition of the Norman dynasty’s authoritarian state and the Spanish autocracy, we have to figure out how medieval traditions influence the realities of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It can be a dangerous historical leap. It is difficult to refer all kinds of social problems to the colonial experience of Japanese imperialism. It is also not proper to conclude that trust is the source of all kinds of virtues and distrust all kinds of social diseases. We need to draw cautious conclusions on the colonial experience as the origin of the lack of trust in the societies of southern Italy and Korea.
참고문헌 (25)
- Almond, Gabriel, "The Civic Culture" (1963), Princeton: Princeton University Press
- Banfield, Edward C., "The Moral Basis of a Backward Society" (1958), New York: Free Press
- 장수찬, "한국사회에 나타난 악순환의 사이클: 결사체 참여(civic engagement), 사회자본(social sapital), 그리고 정부신뢰(confidence in political institutions)", 한국정치학회보, 36(1), pp.87~112 (2002), 한국정치학회
- Clague, Christopher K., "Institutions and Economic Development" (1997), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
- Fukuyama, Francis., "Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity" (1995), New York: Free Press
- Fukuyama, Francis., "The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order" (1999), New York: Free Press
- Gambetta, Diego., "Mafia: The Price of Distrust", pp.158~175 (1988), Cambridge: Basil Blackwell
- Gambetta, Diego., "The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection" (1993), ambridge: Harvard University Press
- Han, Do-Hyeon., "Rush Modernization and the Structure of Distrust", Presented at the Trust Society and Korea in the 21st Century Seminar (1999), Academy of Korean Studies
- Hawthorn, Geoffrey., "Three Ironies in Trust. In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations", pp.111~126 (1988), Cambridge: Basil Blackwell
- Hooghe, Marc, "Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective" (2003), New York: Macmillan
- Inglehart, Ronald., "Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society" (1991), Princeton: Princeton University Press
- Kaase, Max, "Beliefs in Government" (1995), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- , ed. Byong-Kun Kang. Chunchon: Research Institute of National Integration, Hallym University, , 2000
- Kim, In-Young., "A Comparison of (Low) Trust in Korea and Italy. In A Changing Korea in Regional and Global Contexts, eds. Lee-Jay Cho, Chung-Si Ahn, and Choong Nam Kim. Honolulu: East-West Center", ~ (2004)
- Kramer, R.M., "Trust in Organizations" (1996), Thousand Oaks: Sage
- Kuk, Minho., "Society of Trust: Confucianism and Family", Presented at a conference of the Association of Sociology, Korea. (1998)
- Lee, Jaehyuck., "Social Structure of Trust . Hankuk sahwehak", Sociology of Korea, 32(Spring), pp.311~335 (1998)
- Misztal, Barbara., "Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order" (1996), New York: Polity Press
- Morlino, Leonardo., "Italy’s Civic Divide", Journal of Democracy, 6 (1995)
- Pagden, Anthony., "The Destruction of Trust and Its Economic Consequences in the Case of Eighteenth-Century Naples", pp.127~141 (1988), Cambridge: Basil Blackwell
- Putnam, Robert., "Making Democracy Work" (1993), Princeton: Princeton University Press
- Rothstein, Bo, "All for All: Equality and Social Trust", World Politics, 58, pp.41~72 (2005)
- Tarrow, Sidney., "Making Social Science Work across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work", American Political Science Review, 90(2) (1996)
- , Summer, , 1998