본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Central Eurasian Hoards and their Epistemological Potential and Pitfals

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper presents a commentary on the methodological tension betwen hoards, museums and burial sites, asociated with pastoral nomadic communites along the vast Eurasian stepe. Nomadic art and material culture have continuously lived at the fringes of art-historical and archaeological inquires, and their systematic theoretical exploration has ben further detered by the curent “top-down” aproach in analyses of the stepe archaeological record. Firstly, I problematize the discrepancy betwen museum acquisitons of (what is labeled as) nomadic art acquired from the antiquites market and what is subsequently categorized as a “hoard” or “treasure”. I observe that certain unrelated sets of objects only became hoards after they reached museums and private colections, and so long as their stylistic characteristics fit a pre-established notion of what stepe nomads could and could not have produced. Secondly, the folowing discourse prompts an investigation into the vital distinction betwen authenticated ritual contexts (e.g., burials) and wealth deposits in non-sedentary Central Eurasian societies, which are particularly vulnerable to ambiguous or misaplied labels. The study thus brings up previously-overloked discrepancies, whose recogniton and further study could bolster not only research practices but also teaching aproaches to Central Eurasian art.

Abstract

This paper presents a commentary on the methodological tension betwen hoards, museums and burial sites, asociated with pastoral nomadic communites along the vast Eurasian stepe. Nomadic art and material culture have continuously lived at the fringes of art-historical and archaeological inquires, and their systematic theoretical exploration has ben further detered by the curent “top-down” aproach in analyses of the stepe archaeological record. Firstly, I problematize the discrepancy betwen museum acquisitons of (what is labeled as) nomadic art acquired from the antiquites market and what is subsequently categorized as a “hoard” or “treasure”. I observe that certain unrelated sets of objects only became hoards after they reached museums and private colections, and so long as their stylistic characteristics fit a pre-established notion of what stepe nomads could and could not have produced. Secondly, the folowing discourse prompts an investigation into the vital distinction betwen authenticated ritual contexts (e.g., burials) and wealth deposits in non-sedentary Central Eurasian societies, which are particularly vulnerable to ambiguous or misaplied labels. The study thus brings up previously-overloked discrepancies, whose recogniton and further study could bolster not only research practices but also teaching aproaches to Central Eurasian art.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Some Notes on Methodology in Studies of Ancient Funerary Cultures, "Andreeva, P.", ~, pp.Academia Papers 1 (2020)
  2. Bikenov A., "Ethno-cultural aspects of the state of Eurasian nomads", Anthropologist, 26(1-2) (2016)
  3. Bradley, Richard, "The Passage of Arms: and Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  4. Bradley, Richard, "Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe" (2005), Taylor &Francis
  5. Brück, J., "Ritual and rationality: Some problems of interpretation in European archaeology", European Journal of Archaeology, 2(3)
  6. Bussagli, Mario, "Painting of Central Asia" (1963), World Pub. Co
  7. Clarke. S., "In Search of a Different Roman Period: The Finds Assemblages at the Newstead Military Complex", TRAC99 Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Theoretical Archaeology Conference 1999 (2000), Oxbow Books
  8. Clough, R. E., "Furnaces and Smelting Technology in Antiquity" (1985), British Museum
  9. Cultural Relics Station of Yikezhaomeng, "Neimenggu Dongshengshi Nianfangqu faxian jinyinqi jiaocang (A hoard of gold and silver objects discovered at Nianfangqu, Dongsheng city, Inner Mongolia)", Kaogu, 5 (1991)
  10. Davis, M., "Rethinking Celtic Art" (2008), Oxbow Books
  11. Fitzpatrick, A. P., "The Snettisham, Norfolk, Hoards of Iron Age Torcs : Sacred or Profane?", Antiquity, 66 (1992)
  12. Garrow, D., "Rethinking Celtic Art" (2008), Oxbow Books
  13. Garrow, D., "Technologies of enchantment: exploring Celtic art : 400BC to AD 100" (2012), Oxford University Press
  14. Gombrich, E. H., "The sense of order: a study in the psychology of decorative art" (1979), Cornell University Press
  15. Gosudarstvennyĭ Ėrmitazh, "Zolotai︠a︡ Orda i Prichernomorʹe: uroki Chingisidskoĭ imperii" (2019), Fond Mardzhani
  16. Jackson, R., "Camerton: The Late Iron Age and Early Roman Metalwork" (1990), British Museum Press
  17. Johns, C., "TRAC 94: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference 1994" (1995), Oxbow Books
  18. Kradin, Nikolay, "Ancient Steppe Nomad Societies" (2018), Oxford University Press
  19. Kramarovskiĭ, Mark, "Sokrovishcha Zolotoĭ Ordy" (2000), Sankt-Peterburg
  20. Leahy, Kevin, "The Staffordshire Hoard" (2014), British Museum Press
  21. Leskov, A. M., "The Maikop treasure", University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, ~ (2008)
  22. Leskov, A.M., "The Maikop Treasure", The Silk Road, 2(2) (2004)
  23. Levy, J. E., "An Analysis of Ritual Hoard Finds. BAR international series, 124" (1982), Oxford: B.A.R
  24. Metropolitan Museum of Art, "Thracian treasures from Bulgaria", Metropolitan Museum of Art, ~ (1977)
  25. Marazov, Ivan, "and Alexander Fol" (1998), Abrams
  26. Miller, Daniel, "Materiality" (2006), Duke Univ. Press
  27. Munchaev, R. M, "Kavkaz na zare bronzovogo veka" (1975), Nauka
  28. Muscarella, Oscar, "Archaeology, artifacts and antiquities of the ancient Near East:sites, cultures, and proveniences" (2013), Brill
  29. Oras, E., "Importance of terms: What is a wealth deposit?", Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 22 (2013), Institute of Archaeology
  30. Pichikyan. I., "Rebirth of the Oxus Treasure: Second part of the Oxus treasure from the Miho Museum Collection", Ancient Civilizations, 4 (1997)
  31. Piotrovsky, "From the Lands of the Scythians", The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, xxxii(5) (1975)
  32. Rawson, Jessica, "Ordos bronzes:catalogue of an exhibition presented jointly by the Oriental Ceramic Society of Hong Kong and the Urban Council of Hong Kong at the Hong Kong Museum of Art", ~ (1990)
  33. Renfrew, C., "The Social Life of Things : Commodities in Cultural Perspective" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  34. Rezepkin, A D., "Das frühbronzezeitliche Gräberfeld von Klady und die Majkop-Kultur in Nordwestkaukasien" (2000), M. Leidorf
  35. Rowland, Benjamin, "The Art of Central Asia" (1974), Crown Publ
  36. Rudenko, S. I., "Frozen tombs of Siberia: the Pazyryk burials of Iron Age horsemen" (1970), University of California Press
  37. Stockhammer, P. W., "Lost in Things: An Archaeologist’s Perspective on the Epistemological Potential of Objects", Nature and culture, 10(3) (2015)
  38. Wace, Rupert, "Ancient bronzes from China, Ordos and the Steppes" (2007), Ben Janssens Oriental Art
  39. Zhao, Fangzhi, "Cao yuan wenhua: youmu minzu de guangkuo wutai" (1996), Shang wu yin shu guan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)