본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상장회사를 어떻게 규제할 것인가?

Listed Companies and the Draft New Commercial Code

김화진
법학연구소 (The Institute of Legal Studies Konkuk University)|2008.03|서울대학교 법학|제49권 제1호|pp. 159-230

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

상장회사지배구조Listed CompaniesCorporate GovernanceInvestor Protection상법비상장회사투자자 보호Commercial CodeClosed Companies
주제분류법학

초록

The draft new Commercial Code contains special rules for governance of listed companies. These rules have been moved from the Securities and Exchange Act that will be abolished with the implementation of the new Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act in early 2009. This Article reviews and comments on the key provisions of the draft bill. This Article takes a structural approach to the regulatory framework for listed companies. The current regime as well as the draft bill does not focus on the inherent differences between closed companies and public (listed) companies. To date, the rules for listed companies have been promulgated whenever ad hoc regulatory needs arose. The outcome was unbalanced and somewhat confused system of today. This Article proposes the legislature to begin with a thorough contemplation on the differences between closed companies and listed companies in terms of investor protection. This Article also criticizes the current discrimination amongst listed companies based on the asset size, and suggests the legislature to focus also upon the number of shareholders. Then, the Article goes on comprehensively discussing such issues as independent director, preemptive right, appraisal right, takeover defensive tactics, stock options, cumulative voting, and shareholder rights. It critically analyses the draft bill from the perspective of investor protection in a globalizing world. It emphasizes the need to perform empirical studies regarding those important issues to secure the legitimacy for special rules of listed companies. Finally, this Article points out the importance of the enabling approach to the regulation of listed companies.

Abstract

The draft new Commercial Code contains special rules for governance of listed companies. These rules have been moved from the Securities and Exchange Act that will be abolished with the implementation of the new Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act in early 2009. This Article reviews and comments on the key provisions of the draft bill. This Article takes a structural approach to the regulatory framework for listed companies. The current regime as well as the draft bill does not focus on the inherent differences between closed companies and public (listed) companies. To date, the rules for listed companies have been promulgated whenever ad hoc regulatory needs arose. The outcome was unbalanced and somewhat confused system of today. This Article proposes the legislature to begin with a thorough contemplation on the differences between closed companies and listed companies in terms of investor protection. This Article also criticizes the current discrimination amongst listed companies based on the asset size, and suggests the legislature to focus also upon the number of shareholders. Then, the Article goes on comprehensively discussing such issues as independent director, preemptive right, appraisal right, takeover defensive tactics, stock options, cumulative voting, and shareholder rights. It critically analyses the draft bill from the perspective of investor protection in a globalizing world. It emphasizes the need to perform empirical studies regarding those important issues to secure the legitimacy for special rules of listed companies. Finally, this Article points out the importance of the enabling approach to the regulation of listed companies.

참고문헌 (206)

  1. 임재연, "증권거래법과 상법의 관계: 증권거래법의 특례규정과 관련하여", 법조, 55(9), pp.9~ (2006)
  2. 이철송, "증권관계법령의 체계적 정비에 관한 연구" (2002), 코스닥등록법인협의회
  3. "자통법서 빠진 상장법인 관련 법안 재경, 법무부 각각 추진", 서울경제(2007년 9월 4일자), ~ (2007)
  4. "21세기 회사법 개정의 논리" (2007), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  5. "상법 (회사편) 개정 정부안에 대한 참여연대 의견서", ~ (2007)
  6. Rafael La Porta, "Investor Protection and Corporate Governance", Journal of Financial Economics, 58(3), pp.2000~
  7. 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사 직무수행 표준모델과 운영실제", ~ (2006)
  8. "한국기업지배구조개선지원센터" (2006), 기업지배구조 백서
  9. "기업들 상장, 증자 등 갈수록 감소", 한국경제(2004년 4월 13일자) A3, ~ (2004)
  10. "상장폐지 문의 늘고 있다", 이데일리(2004년 6월 17일자), ~ (2004)
  11. "기업들 규제 많은 증시상장 기피", 동아일보(2007년 11월 16일자), ~ (2007)
  12. Ross Levine, "Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth", American Economic Review, 88(537) (1998)
  13. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know, "Thomas Lagoarde-Segot", ~, pp.IIIS Discussion Paper No. 182 (2006)
  14. 이철송, "회사법강의 제14판", pp.79~ (2007), 박영사
  15. Annual Report and Statistics 2006, "World Federation of Exchanges", ~ (2007)
  16. 상법특례조항의 문제점 및 개선방안, "김건식", 54~71 (2006)
  17. 윤영신, "회사지배구조에서 법규제(Legal Rule)와 소프트 로(Soft Law)의 역할 및 관계", 서울대학교 법학, 48(1), pp.85~104 (2007), 법학연구소
  18. Roberta Karmel, "Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders?", Business Lawyer, 60(1), pp.13~ (2004)
  19. Iman Anabtawi, "Some Skepticism About Increasing Shareholder Power", UCLA Law Review, 53(561), pp.581~583 (2006)
  20. "상장 유지비용 너무 많이 든다", 한국경제(2007년 4월 23일자), ~ (2007)
  21. Jill M. D’Aquila, "Tallying the Cost of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act", The CPA Journal (2004)
  22. Donald C. Langevoort, "The Social Construction of Sarbanes-Oxley", Michigan Law Review, 105(1817) (2007)
  23. "증시, 기업자금 빨아들이는 블랙홀", 한국경제(2007년 4월 23일자), ~ (2007)
  24. Stephen Choi, "Securities Regulation: Cases and Analysis", pp.158~161 (2005), Foundation Press
  25. 김화진, "기업인수합병", pp.241~243 (2007), 박영사
  26. Frank H. Easterbrook, "Close Corporations and Agency Costs", Stanford Law Review, 38(271), pp.275~277 (1986)
  27. John Coffee, "The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications", Northwestern University Law Review, 93(641), pp.699~700 (1999)
  28. Joel Seligman, "The New Corporate Law", Brooklyn Law Review, 59(1), pp.2~ (1993)
  29. Joel Seligman, "The Transformation of Wall Street 57" (1995), Aspen Publishers
  30. Amir Licht, "Stock Exchange Mobility, Unilateral Recognition, and the Privatization of Securities Regulation", Virginia Journal of International Law, 41(583), pp.607~ (2001)
  31. Paul G. Mahoney, "The Exchange as Regulator", Virginia Law Review, 83(1453) (1997)
  32. Craig Pirrong, "The Self-Regulation of Commodity Exchanges: The Case of Market Manipulation", Journal of Law and Economics, 38(141) (1995)
  33. A. C. Pritchard, "Markets as Monitors: A Proposal to Replace Class Actions with Exchanges as Securities Fraud Enforcers", Virginia Law Review, 85(925) (1999)
  34. John C., "The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Role of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control", Yale Law Journal, 111(1) (2001)
  35. "City Code on Takeovers and Mergers"[URL]
  36. John Armour, "Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why? The Peculiar Divergence of U.S. and U.K. Takeover Regulation", Georgetwon Law Journal, 95(1727) (2007)
  37. The Puzzling Divergence of Corporate Law: Evidence and Explanations from Japan and the United States, "Mark D. West", ~ (2000)
  38. Lucian Bebchuk, "Optimal Defaults for Corporate Law Evolution", Northwestern University Law Review, 96(489) (2002)
  39. Anita I. Anand, "An Analysis of Enabling vs. Mandatory Corporate Governance Structures Post Sarbanes-Oxley", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 31(229) (2005)
  40. Henry Hansmann, "The Essential Role of Organizational Law", Yale Law Journal, 110(387) (2000)
  41. Iain MacNeil, "Comply or Explain’: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance with the Combined Code", Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(486) (2006)
  42. Helge Bertrams, "Die Haftung des Aufsichtsrats im Zusammenhang mit dem Deutschen Corporate Governance Kodex und", pp.161~ (2004), Duncker & Humblot
  43. 김소연, "기업지배구조 문헌연구", 금융연구, 12(3), pp.29~99 (2007), 한국금융학회
  44. Bernard S. Black, "Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms’ Market Values? Evidence from Korea", Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 22(366), pp.368~ (2006)
  45. The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Independence: An Empirical Analysis, "Audra L. Boone", ~ (2006)
  46. 한국기업지배구조개선지원센터, "기업지배구조 백서", pp.145~146 (2006)
  47. Jeffrey N. Gordon, "The Rise of Independent Directors in the United States, 1950-2005: Of Shareholder Value and Stock Market Prices", Stanford Law Review, 59(1465), pp.1472~1500 (2007)
  48. Sanjai Bhagat, "The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance", Business Lawyer, 54(921)
  49. Eric M. Fogel, "Strangers in the House: Rethinking Sarbanes-Oxley and the Independent Board of Directors", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32(33) (2007)
  50. 박경서, "한국 상장기업의 소유지배구조와 경영행태", 기업지배구조개선 세미나 자료 (2003)
  51. "KT 올해 주총 조용히 끝날까", 연합뉴스(2007년 3월 15일자), ~ (2007)
  52. Mark J. Roe, "Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact" (2003), Oxford
  53. Lyman Johnson, "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgment Rule", Business Lawyer, 60(439) (2005)
  54. Lawrence Hamermesh, "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgment Rule: A Reply to Professor Johnson", Business Lawyer, 60(865) (2005)
  55. 김화진, "이사회 제2판", pp.222~227 (2007), 박영사
  56. Henry Hansmann, "The End of History for Corporate Law", Georgetown Law Journal, 89(439), pp.456~ (2001)
  57. 이철송, "회사법강의 제14판", pp.517~ (2007), 박영사
  58. "사외이사 반대 0.29%뿐 거수기 역할 여전", 매일경제(2007년 3월 4일자), ~ (2007)
  59. "시중은 사외이사 Yes, Yes, Yes!", 문화일보(2007년 4월 25일자), ~ (2007)
  60. "사외이사 경쟁업체 겸직 문제 없다고?", 한국경제(2007년 4월 23일자), ~ (2007)
  61. "최대주주 가는데 사외이사 따라간다", 파이낸셜뉴스(2007년 5월 9일자), ~ (2007)
  62. "시가총액 18조원 우리금융의 이상한 사외이사 선임", 매일경제(2007년 3월 12일자), ~ (2007)
  63. 사외이사의 실질적인 독립성 분석, "경제개혁연대", ~, pp.경제개혁리포트, 2007-6호 (2007)
  64. 조성빈, "기업지배구조의 상호관계 및 기업성과에 관한 연구", 한국개발연구, 28(2), pp.131~177 (2006), 한국개발연구원
  65. Donald C. Clarke, "Three Concepts of the Independent Director", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32(73) (2007)
  66. Cyril Moscow, "The Independent Director", Business Lawyer, 28(9), pp.11~12 (1972)
  67. Hanno Merkt, "US-amerikanisches Gesellschaftsrecht 97 2. Aufl" (2006), Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft
  68. Barry D. Baysinger, "Revolution Versus Evolution in Corporate Law: The ALI’s Project and the Independent Director", George Washington Law Review, 52(557) (1984)
  69. "NYSE Listed Company Manual, 303A.01", ~
  70. John F. Olson, "Composing a Balanced and Effective Board to Meet New Governance Mandates", Business Lawyer, 59(421) (2004)
  71. Jeremy J. Kobeski, "In Re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation: Has a New Species of Director Independence Been Uncovered?", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 29(849) (2004)
  72. Mergers & Acquisitions and Corporate Governance, "Cleary Gottlieb", 12~14 (2006)
  73. 김화진, "이사회 제2판", pp.164~165 (2007), 박영사
  74. 김주영, "우리나라 주주대표소송의 제소 현황 및 판결 경향에 관한 고찰", 기업지배구조 리뷰, pp.15~ (2007)
  75. 우리나라 주주대표소송의 현황 및 과제, "경제개혁연대", ~, pp.경제개혁리포트, 2007-11호 (2007)
  76. "이소송 없애면 재벌 자회사 위법동원 막을 길 없다", 한겨레(2007년 3월 22일자), ~ (2007)
  77. Stephen Choi, "Evidence on Securities Class Actions", Vanderbilt Law Review, 57(1465) (2004)
  78. Dae Hwan Chung, "Introduction to South Korea’s New Securities-Related Class Action", Journal of Corporation Law, 30(165) (2004)
  79. 최문희, "이사의 손해배상책임의 제한" (2007), 경인문화사
  80. Yaron Brook, "Shareholder Wealth Effects of Directors’ Liability Limitation Provisions", Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, 29(481) (1994)
  81. Roberta Romano, "Corporate Governance in the Aftermath of the Insurance Crisis", Emory Law Journal, 39(1155) (1990)
  82. Tom Baker, "The Missing Monitor in Corporate Governance: The Directors’ & Officers’ Liability Insurer", Georgetown Law Journal, 95(1795) (2007)
  83. Bernard Black, "Outside Director Liability", Stanford Law Review, 58(1055) (2006)
  84. Bernard Black, "Outside Director Liability Across Countries", Texas Law Review, 84(1385) (2006)
  85. Bernard Black, "Legal Liability of Directors and Company Officials Part 1: Substantive Grounds for Liability", Columbia Business Law Review, (614) (2007)
  86. 김건식, "은행이사의 선관주의의무와 경영판단 원칙", 민사판례연구, (26), pp.404~431 (2004), 민사판례연구회
  87. 이철송, "이사의 책임에 관한 몇 가지 이론", BFL, (4), pp.83~ (2004)
  88. "기업의정직성과취소소송의현대화에관한법률(UMAG)", ~
  89. Walter G. Paefgen, "Dogmatische Grundlagen, Anwendungsbereich und Formulierung einer Business Judgment Rule im künftigen UMAG", Die Aktiengesellschaft, 49(245) (2004)
  90. Markus Roth, "Das unternehmerische Ermessen des Vorstands", Betriebs-Berater, (1066) (2004)
  91. Andrea Lohse, "Unternehmerisches Ermessen" (2005), Mohr Siebeck
  92. Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Director’s Duty of Care in Negotiated Dispositions", University of Miami Law Review, 51(579) (1997)
  93. Jon Canfield, "The Evolution of a More Stringent Business Judgment Rule in Banking: The Minimization of Director Deference", U.C. Davis Business Law Journal, 6(17) (2006)
  94. 김화진, "회사기회의 유용과 부당내부거래", (1, pp.2) (2007), 15~
  95. Roberta Karmel, "Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders?", Business Lawyer, 60(1), pp.1~ (2004)
  96. Melvin Eisenberg, "The Duty of Good Faith in Corporate Law", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 31(1) (2006)
  97. Hillary Sale, "Delaware’s Good Faith", Cornell Law Review, 89(456) (2004)
  98. Sean Griffith, "Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence", Duke Law Journal, 55(1) (2005)
  99. 윤진수, "美國 契約法上 Good Faith 原則", 서울대학교 법학, 44(4), pp.40~93 (2003), 법학연구소
  100. Bernard Black, "The Core Fiduciary Duties of Outside Directors", Asia Business Law Review, 3 (2001)
  101. Robert Clark, "Corporate Law 제7장" (1986), Little, Brown and Company
  102. Eric Talley, "Turning Servile Opportunities to Gold: A Strategic Analysis of the Corporate Opportunities Doctrine", Yale Law Journal, 108(277) (1998)
  103. "물량 몰아준 현대차 631억 과징금", 한겨레(2007년 9월 6일자), ~ (2007)
  104. "비상장 계열사는 경영권 승계용?", 한겨레21(2007년 8월 9일 제672호), ~ (2007)
  105. 회사기회의 유용을 통한 지배주주 일가의 부(富)의 증식에 관한 보고서, "경제개혁연대", ~ (2006)
  106. 재벌 총수일가의 주식거래에 관한 2차 보고서, "경제개혁연대", ~ (2007)
  107. 기업지배구조개선지원센터, "2006년 백서", pp.184~185
  108. "증권거래법상 감사위원회 규정 정비 절실", 법률신문(2007년 4월 30일자), ~ (2007)
  109. 박상근, "인터넷 시대의 회사법을 위한 일시론", 서울대학교 법학, 43(1), pp.272~ (2002)
  110. 고창현, "상법개정안 중 주주총회 관련 특례규정에 관한 소고", BFL, (27), pp.77~ (2008)
  111. Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union, , ~ (2007)
  112. Jeffrey Gordon, "Institutions as Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting", Columbia Law Review, 94(124) (1994)
  113. Rafael La Porta, "Corporate Ownership Around the World", Journal of Finance, 54(471) (1999)
  114. Rafael La Porta, "Legal Determinants of External Finance", Journal of Finance, 52(1131) (1997)
  115. Rafael La Porta, "Investor Protection and Corporate Governance", Journal of Financial Economics, 58(3) (2000)
  116. John C. Coffee, Jr, "The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Role of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control", Yale Law Journal, 111(1) (2001)
  117. Alfred F. Conard, "A Behavioral Analysis of Directors’ Liability for Negligence", Duke Law Journal, (895), pp.901~ (1972)
  118. Thomas M. Jones, "An Empirical Examination of the Incidence of Shareholder Derivative and Class Action Lawsuits 1971-1978", Boston University Law Review, 60(306) (1980)
  119. Roberta Romano, "The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation?", Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7(551) (1991)
  120. Bernard Black, "The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions 2nd ed 제22장" (1995), West Group
  121. Guhan Subramanian, "Fixing Freezeouts", Yale Law Journal, 115(2) (2005)
  122. Wienand Meilicke, "Zur Verfassungsmässigkeit der Squeeze-out-Regelungen－insbesondere in der Insolvenz des Hauptaktionärs", Die Aktiengesellschaft, 52(261) (2007)
  123. 송현웅, "주주제안권 행사의 제문제", BFL, (27), pp.51~ (2008)
  124. 한국상장회사협의회, "상장회사 주주총회 백서", pp.55~57 (2007)
  125. The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings, "Jonathan M. Karpoff", 26~27 (2001)
  126. Jonathan Karpoff, "Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence", Journal of Financial Economics, 42(365) (1996)
  127. Reciprocity in Takeovers, "Marco Becht", European Corporate Governance Institute, ~ (2003)
  128. Curtis J. Milhaupt, "In the Shadow of Delaware? The Rise of Hostile Takeovers in Japan", Columbia Law Review, 105(2171) (2005)
  129. 김화진, "기업인수합병" (2007), 박영사
  130. Takeover Defenses and Competition, "Martijn Cremers", Yale ICF, ~ (2007)
  131. Takeover Laws and Financial Development, "Tatiana Nenova", ~ (2006)
  132. "재경부, 금감원, 적대적 M&A 딴 목소리", 매일경제(2007년 7월 25일자), ~ (2007)
  133. "적대적 M&A 방어, 또 엇박자", 한국일보(2007년 7월 24일자), ~ (2007)
  134. Stefan Grundmann, "Golden Shares-State Control in Privatised Companies", European Banking & Financial Law Journal, 1 (2004)
  135. "전략산업 보호 위해 황금주 활용해야", 한국경제(2007년 7월 25일자), ~ (2007)
  136. "경제개혁연대, 황금주 도입 절대반대", 이데일리(2006년 8월 3일자), ~ (2006)
  137. "열린우리당 황금주 도입검토", 매일경제(2008년 8월 2일자), ~ (2008)
  138. Alberto Toffoleto, "Italy Reforms Company Law", IFLR Mergers and Acquisitions, (2004), pp.137~ (2004)
  139. Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Precommitment Strategies in Corporate Law: The Case of Dead Hand and No Hand Pills", Journal of Corporation Law, 29(1) (2003)
  140. "Moran v. Household International, Inc., 500 A.2d 1346 (Del. 1985)", ~ (1985)
  141. Martin Lipton, "Pills, Polls, and Professors Redux", University of Chicago Law Review, 69(1037) (2002)
  142. Guhan Subramanian, "Bargaining in the Shadow of Takeover Defenses", Yale Law Journal, 113(621) (2003)
  143. Guhan Subramanian, "Bargaining in the Shadow of PeopleSoft’s (Defective) Poison Pill", Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 12(41), pp.43~ (2007)
  144. Julian Velasco, "Just Do It: An Antidote to the Poison Pill", Emory Law Journal, 52(849) (2003)
  145. Do Pills Poison Operating Performance?, "Jonathan M. Karpoff", ~ (2002)
  146. Curtis J. Milhaupt, "In the Shadow of Delaware? The Rise of Hostile Takeovers in Japan", Columbia Law Review, 105(2171) (2005)
  147. 최문희, "일본의 포이즌 필 발행 사례와 법적 쟁점: 불독 사건에 관한 최고재판소 판례를 중심으로", BFL, (26), pp.98~ (2007)
  148. 송현웅, "일본의 적대적 M&A와 기업매수 방어사례 동향: 불독소스 Case를 중심으로", 기업지배구조리뷰, (35), pp.38~ (2007)
  149. Guhan Subramanian, "A New Takeover Defense Mechanism: Using an Equal Treatment Agreement as an Alternative to the Poison Pill", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 23(375) (1998)
  150. Jeffrey N. Gordon, "Ties That Bond: Dual Class Common Stock and the Problem of Shareholder Choice", California Law Review, 76(1) (1988)
  151. Incentives vs. Control: An Analysis of U.S. Dual-Class Companies, "Paul Gompers", ~ (2004)
  152. Hedge Fund Investor Activism and Takeovers, "Robin Greenwood", ~ (2007)
  153. Ralf Thaeter, "Shareholder Activism: Gesellschaftsrechtliche Schranken aktiven Aktionrsverhaltens", Die Aktiengesellschaft, 52(301) (2007)
  154. 박진표, "경영권 방어수단으로서의 지배권부 주식 도입의 제안", 기업지배구조리뷰, (29), pp.46~ (2006)
  155. "주권상장법인 정관 기재유형", pp.12~13 (2007), 한국상장회사협의회
  156. "Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A. 2d 946 (Del. 1985)", ~ (1985)
  157. Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Unocal at 20: Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 31(769) (2006)
  158. Ronald Gilson, "Unocal Fifteen Years Later (and What We Can Do About It)", Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 26(491) (2001)
  159. Robert B. Thompson, "Toward a New Theory of the Shareholder Role: Sacred Space in Corporate Takeovers", Texas Law Review, 80(261) (2001)
  160. "금융감독원 정례브리핑자료", ~ (2007)
  161. "尹금감 의무공개매수제 부활 검토", 이데일리(2006년 2월 27일자), ~ (2006)
  162. "韓부총리, 의무공개매수제 재도입 안한다", 머니투데이(2006년 4월 7일자), ~ (2006)
  163. Lucian A. Bebchuk, "Toward Undistorted Choice and Equal Treatment in Corporate Takeovers", Harvard Law Review, 98(1695) (1985)
  164. Bifurcation or Parallel Routes? In Search of US Functional Substitutes for the British Post-Takeover Mandatory Bid Rule, "Joao Marcelo G. Pacheco", ~ (2006)
  165. Lucian A. Bebchuk, "Why Firms Adopt Antitakeover Arrangements", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 152(713) (2003)
  166. 김효진, "기업지배구조가 자기주식 취득에 미치는 영향", 상장협연구, (55), pp.168~ (2007)
  167. Jonathan R. Macey, "A Theoretical Analysis of Corporate Greenmail", Yale Law Journal, 95(13) (1985)
  168. Liane Bednarz, "Der Ermächtigungsbeschluss der Hauptversammlung zum Erwerb eigener Aktien" (2006), Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft
  169. 최준선, "주식회사 자본제도 개선방안 연구", pp.147~158 (2006), 한국상장회사협의회
  170. "2003카합4154 의결권행사금지가처분", ~
  171. 이철송, "불공정한 자기주식거래의 효력 - 주식평등의 원칙과 관련하여", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.1~25 (2006), 한국증권법학회
  172. "2007카합30 의결권행사금지등가처분", ~
  173. 김옥곤, "전환사채 발행에 관한 판례의 동향", 기업지배구조리뷰, 9(10), pp.28~ (2007)
  174. "자사주 취득금액, 두배 이상 늘어", 이데일리(2007년 4월 23일자), ~ (2007)
  175. "우리은, 포스코 백기사 나선다", 매일경제(2007년 4월 24일자), ~ (2007)
  176. "FTA발효땐 외국자본 M&A 대공세", 파이낸셜뉴스(2007년 4월 16일자), ~ (2007)
  177. "주권상장법인 정관 기재유형", pp.22~29 (2007), 한국상장회사협의회
  178. "잘못된 스톡옵션 관행 바로잡는다", 한국경제(2007년 5월 3일자), ~ (2007)
  179. "금감위, 은행등 스톡옵션 운용 실태 점검", 이데일리(2007년 5월 10일자), ~ (2007)
  180. "금융사스톡옵션 손보겠다", 중앙일보(2007년 5월 9일자), ~ (2007)
  181. Frank H. Easterbrook, "The Economics Structure of Corporate Law", pp.145~149 (1991), Harvard
  182. "서울중앙지법 2005. 11. 3, 2004비합151 결정", ~ (2005)
  183. "주식매수청구가 무서워.. M&A 잇따라 무산", 이데일리(2007년 9월 10일자), ~ (2007)
  184. Bayless Manning, "The Shareholder’s Appraisal Remedy: An Essay for Frank Coker", Yale Law Journal, 72(223), pp.234~236 (1962)
  185. Victor Brudney, "Fair Shares in Mergers and Take-Overs", Harvard Law Review, 88(297), pp.304~307 (1974)
  186. Roberta Romano, , Foundations of Corporate Law, (121) (1993)
  187. Hideki Kanda, "The Appraisal Remedy and the Goals of Corporate Law", UCLA Law Review, 32(429) (1985)
  188. "21C 자본주의 펀드가 지배한다", 중앙SUNDAY(2007년 11월 4일자), ~ (2007)
  189. The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States, "Stuart Gillan", ~ (2007)
  190. "Hedge Funds and Activism", European Corporate Governance Institute Research Newsletter, Spring & Summer 2007, ~ (2007)
  191. Marcel Kahan, "Hedge Funds in Corporate Governance and Corporate Control", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(1021) (2007)
  192. The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings, "Jonathan M. Karpoff", ~ (2001)
  193. "서울고등법원 1999. 5. 19. 선고 99라103 결정", ~ (1999)
  194. Gerard Hertig, "Related Party Transactions", The Anatomy of Corporate Law, (101), pp.126~ (2004)
  195. Klaus Peter Berger, "“Acting in Concert” nach § 30 Abs. 2 WpÜG", Die Aktiengesellschaft, 49(592) (2004)
  196. "헤지거래계약을 이용한 무위험 투자행위에 대한 공시강화방안 검토", 금융감독원 정례브리핑자료, ~ (2006)
  197. FSA, "Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules", FSA Handbook Release 064, ~ (2007)
  198. "Shearman & Sterling Client Publication Asset Management", 4~ (2007)
  199. Report and Account for the Year ended 31 March 2006, "The Takeover Panel", 12~ (2006)
  200. Christoph Kumpan, "Private Equity und der Schutz deutscher Unternehmen", Die Aktiengesellschaft, 52(461) (2007)
  201. Lucian A. Bebchuk, "The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise", Virginia Law Review, 93(675) (2007)
  202. Martin Lipton, "The Many Myths of Lucian Bebchuk", Virginia Law Review, 93(733) (2007)
  203. E. Norman Veasey, "The Stockholder Franchise Is Not a Myth: A Response to Professor Bebchuk", Virginia Law Review, 93(811) (2007)
  204. Stephen M. Bainbridge, "The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights", UCLA Law Review, 53(601) (2006)
  205. Henry Hu, "The New Vote Buying: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership", Southern California Law Review, 79(811), pp.828~829 (2006)
  206. Roberta Karmel, "Should a Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders?", Business Lawyer, 60(1), pp.21~ (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

상장회사 특례제도의 문제점 및 개선방안김순석한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2015 · 제34권 제2호상장회사에 있어 지배구조 관련 제도의 입법적 과제김순석한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2007 · 제26권 제2호상법상 상장회사법규의 개선방향최준선법학연구원 · 성균관법학2011 · 제23권 제2호법경제학 관점에서의 상법상 상장회사 특례에 대한 소고고현수법학연구소 · 홍익법학2025 · 제26권 제3호現行 商法에 비추어 본 株主의 新株引受權 制度의 當爲性에 관한 考察김이수한국상사판례학회 · 상사판례연구2010 · 제23권 제4호주식회사 기관제도의 개선방향에 관한 연구 -상법 개정안을 중심으로-심영법학연구소 · 일감법학2010 · 제18호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

가인 김병로 선생의 범죄론체계와 한국형법의 총칙규정신동운pp. 1-26노동쟁의조정법 제정심의의 주요쟁점이흥재pp. 27-52전세계소득 납세의무와 조세조약상 거주자 개념이창희pp. 53-70대한상사중재원의 2007년 국제중재규칙의 주요 내용과 그에 대한 평가석광현pp. 71-109대명률의 죄형법정주의 원칙정긍식pp. 110-158
원문 보기