Enforcement of Court Decision Regarding Payment of a Sum of Money in Civil Disputes to Support the Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The judiciary plays a very important role in encouraging the progress of the ease of doing business in Indonesia because the judiciary is also affected by economic globalization. The Indonesian Supreme Court has issued several policies related to justice reform to provide the best services for justice seekers, especially in the case of a quick, simple, and inexpensive case resolution process to support the ease of doing business. However, the policy has not reached the final stage of enforcement of the decision, especially in civil disputes, related to payment of a sum of money. There is still a legal vacuum to trace the Respondent’s assets, making it difficult for the Petitioner to obtain his rights after a court ruling ordered payment of a sum of money. Therefore, the Supreme Court needs to strictly regulate the authority and responsibility of tracing the Respondent’s assets to facilitate the enforcement of decision for the fulfillment of the Petitioner’s rights.
Abstract
The judiciary plays a very important role in encouraging the progress of the ease of doing business in Indonesia because the judiciary is also affected by economic globalization. The Indonesian Supreme Court has issued several policies related to justice reform to provide the best services for justice seekers, especially in the case of a quick, simple, and inexpensive case resolution process to support the ease of doing business. However, the policy has not reached the final stage of enforcement of the decision, especially in civil disputes, related to payment of a sum of money. There is still a legal vacuum to trace the Respondent’s assets, making it difficult for the Petitioner to obtain his rights after a court ruling ordered payment of a sum of money. Therefore, the Supreme Court needs to strictly regulate the authority and responsibility of tracing the Respondent’s assets to facilitate the enforcement of decision for the fulfillment of the Petitioner’s rights.
참고문헌 (42)
- Ahmad Mujahidin, "Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia" (2007), Bandung
- Djazuli Bachar, "Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perrdata, Segi Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum, 125" (1994), Akademika Presindo
- Herri Swantoro, "Dilema Eksekusi: Ketika Eksekusi Perdata Ada di Simpang Jalan Pembelajaran dari Pengadilan Negeri, 25" (2018), Rayyana Komunikasindo
- M. Tanziel Aziezi, "Penguatan Sistem Eksekusi Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia, 52" (2019), Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan Indonesian Institute for Independent Judiciary
- M. Yahya Harahap, "Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, 6" (2009), Sinar Grafika
- M. Yahya Harahap, "Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata" (2006), Sinar Grafika
- Mulya Haryadi, "Langkah Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Deklarator Yang Tidak Dapat Dieksekusi" (2014), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
- Retnowulan Sutantio, "Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek., 1" (1989), Mandar Maju
- Sudikno Mertokusumo, "Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, 183" (1999), Liberty
- Rahmawati Kasim, "Eksekusi yang Tidak Dapat Dijalankan Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata", Lex et Societatis, 5, pp.1~ (2017)
- Sri Hartini, "Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam engketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman", J. Civ., 14, pp.2~ (2017)
- Winda Pebrianti, "Tinjauan Hukum atas Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi Apabila Obyek Jaminan Beralih Kepada Pihak Ketiga atau Musnah", Supremasi Hukum, 21, pp.1~ (2012)
- "Number 64 PK", Pdt (2007), ~
- "Number 611 K", Pdt (2004), ~
- "Number 245", Pdt, PT.DKI (Indon.) (2003)[DOI]
- "Number 523", Pdt.G (2001), ~
- "Bank Dunia"[URL]
- "Peran Peradilan Dalam Meningkatkan Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia"[URL]
- "Herzien Inlandsch Reglement, art. 195, para. 1 (Indon.)", ~
- "Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg), art. 206, para. 1 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, art. 54, paras. 1 and 2 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 7 of 1989 on the Religious Courts, art. 95 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, art. 61 and art. 62, para. 1 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, art. 1 num. 11 and art. 57 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 14 of 2008 on Openness of Public Information, art. 1 num. 5 (Indon.)", ~
- "Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2011 on Procedures for Settling Public Information Disputes in Courts, art. 12 para. 1 (Indon.)", ~
- "HIR, art. 224 (Indon.)", ~
- "RBg art. 258 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights and Objects Related to Land, art. 1 num. 1 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 4 of 1996, art. 14, para. 3 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees, art. 1 num. 2 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. 42 of 1999, art. 15, para. 2 (Indon.)", ~
- "HIR, art. 204 (Indon.)", ~
- "Law No. I of 2004 on The State Treasury, art. 50 (Indon.)", ~
- "Italian CPC, art. 492 bis (Ita.)", ~
- "Germany Law No. 121 of 1 April 1981 on Reform of the Administration of Public Security, art.8 (Ger.)", ~
- "ZPO, art. 802b (Ger.)", ~
- "ZPO art. 802c and 802f (Ger.)", ~
- "ZPO, art. 802g (Ger.)", ~
- Abdul Manan, "Eksekusi dan Lelang dalam Hukum Perdata", Paper presented at the Supreme Court’s National Working Meeting (2011)
- Hilario G.Davide, Jr., "Comments on the Paper of Hon. Andrew Kwok Nang Li, Chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hongkong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China", paper presented on the Conference of Chief Justices of Asia and Pacific, 18th Lawasia Conference (1999)
- Muhammad Hatta Ali, "The Role of the Judiciary in Improving the Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia", keynote Speech at a national seminar prepared by the Indonesia’s Supreme Court and the Federal Court of Australia (2016)