제5 중족골 기저부 제 I, II구역 비전위성 골절의 보존적 치료
Conservative Treatment of Nondisplaced Fifth Metatarsal Base Zone I and II Fractures
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Zone I fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone can generally be treated by conservative methods while both surgical and conservative methods are used for zone II fractures. However, the clinical results of conservative treatment have been rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical results of conservative treatment for zone I and II nondisplaced fractures. Materials and Methods: Between July 2007 and August 2008, consecutive thirty seven patients (38 fractures) with zone I and II fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone were treated with tolerable weight bearing and minimum duration of immobilization based on pain on weight bearing. We evaluated the duration of immobilization, time to clinical and radiographic union, and time to pre-injury activity level. Results: Clinical and radiological union were achieved in all patients without any complications including malunion or nonunion. The mean duration of immobilization was 28.7 days. The mean 33.1 days and 48.9 days were required for clinical union and radiographic union respectively, after the initial injury. The mean time to pre-injury activity level was 4.8 months. Conclusion: Our study shows that the acute nondisplaced zone I, II fracture of fifth metatarsal bone can be treated effectively using tolerable weight bearing and minimum duration of immobilization, which is based on the pain on weight bearing.
Abstract
Purpose: Zone I fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone can generally be treated by conservative methods while both surgical and conservative methods are used for zone II fractures. However, the clinical results of conservative treatment have been rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical results of conservative treatment for zone I and II nondisplaced fractures. Materials and Methods: Between July 2007 and August 2008, consecutive thirty seven patients (38 fractures) with zone I and II fractures of the fifth metatarsal bone were treated with tolerable weight bearing and minimum duration of immobilization based on pain on weight bearing. We evaluated the duration of immobilization, time to clinical and radiographic union, and time to pre-injury activity level. Results: Clinical and radiological union were achieved in all patients without any complications including malunion or nonunion. The mean duration of immobilization was 28.7 days. The mean 33.1 days and 48.9 days were required for clinical union and radiographic union respectively, after the initial injury. The mean time to pre-injury activity level was 4.8 months. Conclusion: Our study shows that the acute nondisplaced zone I, II fracture of fifth metatarsal bone can be treated effectively using tolerable weight bearing and minimum duration of immobilization, which is based on the pain on weight bearing.
참고문헌 (21)
- Acker JH, "Nonoperative treatment of stress fractures of the proximal shaft of the fifth metatarsal (Jones’ fracture)", Foot Ankle, 7, pp.152~155 (1986)
- Chuckpaiwong B, "Distinguishing Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, pp.1966~1970 (2008)
- Dameron TB, "Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal", J Bone Joint Surg, 57(A), pp.788~792 (1975)
- Dameron TB, "Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal: Selecting the Best Treatment Option", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 3, pp.110~114 (1995)
- Glasgow MT, "Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: the Jones fracture", Foot Ankle Int, 17, pp.449~457 (1996)
- Gray AC, "A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal", The Foot, 18, pp.156~158 (2008)
- Hens J, "Surgical treatment of Jones fractures", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 109, pp.277~279 (1990)
- Khan W, "Management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity", The Foot, 15, pp.141~145 (2005)
- Kim YC, "Operative Treatment for Avulsion Fracture of Base of the Fifth Metatarsal", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 8, pp.92~96 (2004)
- Larson CM, "Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. Analysis of failure", Am J Sports Med, 30, pp.55~60 (2002)
- Mologne TS, "Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures", Am J Sports Med, 33, pp.970~975 (2005)
- Nunley JA, "Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture", Orthop Clin North Am, 32, pp.171~180 (2001)
- Quill GE, "Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal", Orthop Clin North Am, 26, pp.353~361 (1995)
- Rettig AC, "The surgical treatment of symptomatic nonunions of the proximal (metaphyseal) fifth metatarsal in athletes", Am J Sports Med, 20, pp.50~54 (1992)
- Rosenberg GA, "Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 8, pp.332~338 (2000)
- Sarimo J, "Tension-band wiring for fractures of the fifth metatarsal located in the junction of the proximal metaphysis and diaphysis", Am J Sports Med, 34, pp.476~480 (2006)
- Torg JS, "Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity", Orthopedics, 13, pp.731~737 (1990)
- Torg JS, "Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for nonsurgical and surgical management", J Bone Joint Surg, 66(A), pp.209~214 (1984)
- "Rev Med Suisse", 2007, 1792~1794
- Vorlat P, "Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal", Int Orthop, 31, pp.5~10 (2007)
- Wiener BD, "Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study", Foot Ankle Int, 18, pp.267~269 (1997)