제5중족골 제1, 2구역 골절의 비수술적 치료 결과
Results of Non-Operative Treatment of the Zone I, II Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the results of conservative treatment of zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fracture. Materials and Methods: Between May 2004 and June 2010, a total of 58 patients of zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fractures were included in this study. The mean length of follow-up was 13.5 months (12~36 months). All of the patients were treated with full-weight-bearing short leg cast immobilization for 4 weeks and wooden sole shoes for 4 weeks. The results were evaluated about the radiographic union, the midfoot scale of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the tenderness on fracture site and other complications. Results: All patients were able to return to their prior levels of activity. The mean time for union as shown on radiographs was 45.5days, and the mean midfoot scale of AOFAS was 99.7 points. There were no nonunions or refractures during the follow-up. Conclusion: The conservative treatment with full-weight-bearing short leg cast and wooden sole shoes seems to give good results for zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fracture.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the results of conservative treatment of zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fracture. Materials and Methods: Between May 2004 and June 2010, a total of 58 patients of zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fractures were included in this study. The mean length of follow-up was 13.5 months (12~36 months). All of the patients were treated with full-weight-bearing short leg cast immobilization for 4 weeks and wooden sole shoes for 4 weeks. The results were evaluated about the radiographic union, the midfoot scale of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the tenderness on fracture site and other complications. Results: All patients were able to return to their prior levels of activity. The mean time for union as shown on radiographs was 45.5days, and the mean midfoot scale of AOFAS was 99.7 points. There were no nonunions or refractures during the follow-up. Conclusion: The conservative treatment with full-weight-bearing short leg cast and wooden sole shoes seems to give good results for zone I, II 5th metatarsal base fracture.
참고문헌 (10)
- Dameron TB, "Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 57, pp.788~792 (1975)
- Jones R. I, "Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence", Ann Surg, 35, pp.697~700 (1902)
- Clapper MF, "Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 315, pp.238~241 (1995)
- Pietropaoli MP, "Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study", Foot Ankle Int, 20, pp.560~563 (1999)
- Wiener BD, "Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study", Foot Ankle Int, 18, pp.267~269 (1997)
- 서진수, "제5 중족골 기저부 골절의 수술적 치료", 대한족부족관절학회지, 12(2), pp.189~196 (2008), 대한족부족관절학회
- Kavanaugh JH, "The Jones fracture revisited", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 30, pp.776~782 (1978)
- 성기선, "제5 중족골 기저부 제 I, II구역 비전위성 골절의 보존적 치료", 대한족부족관절학회지, 12(2), pp.185~188 (2008), 대한족부족관절학회
- Torg JS, "Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 66, pp.209~214 (1984)
- Vorlat P, "Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal", Int Orthop, 31, pp.5~10 (2007)