전방 도달법과 경비골 도달법을 이용한 족관절 유합술의 결과 비교
Comparison of the Outcomes between the Anterior and Transfibular Approaches in Ankle Arthrodesis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study compared the clinical and radiology results of arthrodesis between the anterior and transfibular approaches with a lateral malleolar-saving procedure in ankle arthritis. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective study of 31 cases who underwent ankle arthrodesis with the anterior approach (14 cases) and trans-fibular approach (17 cases). The remnant lateral malleolus was fixed during the trans-fibular procedure. The patients included 17 females and 14 males with a mean age of 57.2 (range 41~73) years; the mean follow-up was 30.4 (range 15~68) months. The clinical and radiology outcomes, including the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), and union time, were recorded. The complications and subjective satisfaction degrees were also recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: Clinically, the preoperative mean AOFAS score and VAS in the anterior approach group were 39.3 and 7.4, respectively, which changed to 61.9 and 3.1 postoperatively. In the trans-fibular approach group, the mean AOFAS score and VAS increased from 36.6 to 64.2 and 7.1 to 2.4, respectively. On the other hand, no significant differences in the clinical results were observed between the two groups. The time to achieve union was 9.2 and 11.6 weeks in the anterior and transfibular approach groups, respectively. Three patients (21%) complained of tenderness and discomfort around the fibular tip in the anterior approach group, and seven patients (41%) showed a gap between the talus and remnant lateral malleolus in the trans-fibular approach group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the clinical and radiological results between the anterior and transfibular approaches with a lateral malleolar saving procedure in ankle arthrodesis. Careful selection of the approach method according to the patient's preoperative condition is needed to prevent remnant discomfort or nonunion around the lateral malleolus.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the clinical and radiology results of arthrodesis between the anterior and transfibular approaches with a lateral malleolar-saving procedure in ankle arthritis. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective study of 31 cases who underwent ankle arthrodesis with the anterior approach (14 cases) and trans-fibular approach (17 cases). The remnant lateral malleolus was fixed during the trans-fibular procedure. The patients included 17 females and 14 males with a mean age of 57.2 (range 41~73) years; the mean follow-up was 30.4 (range 15~68) months. The clinical and radiology outcomes, including the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS), and union time, were recorded. The complications and subjective satisfaction degrees were also recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: Clinically, the preoperative mean AOFAS score and VAS in the anterior approach group were 39.3 and 7.4, respectively, which changed to 61.9 and 3.1 postoperatively. In the trans-fibular approach group, the mean AOFAS score and VAS increased from 36.6 to 64.2 and 7.1 to 2.4, respectively. On the other hand, no significant differences in the clinical results were observed between the two groups. The time to achieve union was 9.2 and 11.6 weeks in the anterior and transfibular approach groups, respectively. Three patients (21%) complained of tenderness and discomfort around the fibular tip in the anterior approach group, and seven patients (41%) showed a gap between the talus and remnant lateral malleolus in the trans-fibular approach group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the clinical and radiological results between the anterior and transfibular approaches with a lateral malleolar saving procedure in ankle arthrodesis. Careful selection of the approach method according to the patient's preoperative condition is needed to prevent remnant discomfort or nonunion around the lateral malleolus.
참고문헌 (22)
- Cody A. Bowers, "Traditional Ankle Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Ankle Arthritis", Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 26(2), pp.259~271 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Roger A. Mann, "Arthrodesis of the Ankle: A Critical Analysis", Foot & Ankle International, 19(1), pp.3~9 (1998), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Scranton PE Jr, "An overview of ankle arthrodesis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 268, pp.96~101 (1991)
- Aaron B. Colman, "Transfibular Ankle Arthrodesis with Rigid Internal Fixation: An Assessment of Outcome", Foot Ankle Int, 28(3), pp.303~307 (2007), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- David Gordon, "Open Ankle Arthrodeses via an Anterior Approach", Foot Ankle Int, 34(3), pp.386~391 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- 김전교, "Ankle Arthrodesis: A Comparison of Anterior Approach and Transfibular Approach", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 10(3), pp.368~373 (2018), 대한정형외과학회
- GJ Stranks, "Anterior ankle arthrodesis with cross-screw fixation. A dowel graft method used in 20 cases", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 76-B(6), pp.943~946 (1994), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- 박치형, "족근 관절 관절염에서 족관절 유합술의 결과: 전방 도달법과 경비골 도달법 비교", 대한족부족관절학회지, 18(4), pp.189~194 (2014), 대한족부족관절학회[DOI]
- 정형진, "경비골 도달법을 이용한 족관절 유합술 시 외과의 보존과희생 방법의 차이에 따른 결과", 대한족부족관절학회지, 14(2), pp.135~139 (2010), 대한족부족관절학회
- Aneel Nihal, "Ankle arthrodesis", Foot and Ankle Surgery, 14(1), pp.1~10 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Steven F. Boc, "Ankle Arthrodesis", Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 29(1), pp.103~113 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Holt ES, "Ankle arthrodesis using internal screw fixation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 268, pp.21~28 (1991)
- Saltzman CL, "Perspective on total ankle replacement", Foot Ankle Clin, 5, pp.761~775 (2000)
- Cort D. Lawton, "Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis—a comparison of outcomes over the last decade", Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 12(1), pp.76~ (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- John Charnley, "COMPRESSION ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE AND SHOULDER", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 33-B(2), pp.180~191 (1951), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- R Helm, "The results of ankle arthrodesis", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 72-B(1), pp.141~143 (1990), British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery[DOI]
- Jeremy T. Smith, "Open Ankle Arthrodesis With a Fibular-Sparing Technique", Foot Ankle Int, 34(4), pp.557~562 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Gabriel A. Akra, "Outcome of Ankle Arthrodesis Using a Transfibular Approach", The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 49(6), pp.508~512 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Patrick A. DeHeer, "Ankle arthrodesis: a literature review", Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 29(4), pp.509~527 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- KT Mahan, "Podiatry Institute ankle fusion technique", Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 87(3), pp.101~116 (1997), American Podiatric Medical Association[DOI]
- Dong Yeon Lee, "A modified transfibular technique of ankle arthrodesis using partial fibular resection and onlay bone graft", PLOS ONE, 15(10), pp.e0241141~ (2020), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Lisa M. Coester, "Long-Term Results Following Ankle Arthrodesis for Post-Traumatic Arthritis", The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 83(2), pp.219~228 (2001), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]