대학생이 과학 관련 과제에서 사용한 분류 전략의 미시발생적 분석
A Microgenetic Analysis on the Classification Strategy Used in Tasks Related to Science by College Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Following a microgenetic design, this study was analysed the characteristic and the change of classification strategy that appear in college students' classification activity. The 4 tasks were developed for classification activity; a shell as a familiar real things, an animal fossil as a unfamiliar real things, a snow flake as a familiar picture cards and galaxy as a unfamiliar picture card. Achieved study to 6 college students who major in elementary education. Data were collected by interview with subjects, subject's classification schema, investigator's observation of subject's activity, and videotaped that record subject's subject classification process over an extended period of 6 times. Result proved in this study is as following. In the 6 times of the data collection procedures, a strategy F identifying concrete attribution of classification objects and a more detailed strategy X3 combining qualitative, spatial and dimensional attribution were found and more frequently used in both groups of college students which reported a classification process and did not report the process. While discovery and absorption of both a concrete classification strategy and a detailed classification strategy were rapidly developed in the reporting group, they were gradually developed in the non-reporting group. In addition to this, as the data collection procedures were progressing, the college students were familiar with change factors of classification tasks and in the case of pictures the classification strategy showed more desirable changes.
Abstract
Following a microgenetic design, this study was analysed the characteristic and the change of classification strategy that appear in college students' classification activity. The 4 tasks were developed for classification activity; a shell as a familiar real things, an animal fossil as a unfamiliar real things, a snow flake as a familiar picture cards and galaxy as a unfamiliar picture card. Achieved study to 6 college students who major in elementary education. Data were collected by interview with subjects, subject's classification schema, investigator's observation of subject's activity, and videotaped that record subject's subject classification process over an extended period of 6 times. Result proved in this study is as following. In the 6 times of the data collection procedures, a strategy F identifying concrete attribution of classification objects and a more detailed strategy X3 combining qualitative, spatial and dimensional attribution were found and more frequently used in both groups of college students which reported a classification process and did not report the process. While discovery and absorption of both a concrete classification strategy and a detailed classification strategy were rapidly developed in the reporting group, they were gradually developed in the non-reporting group. In addition to this, as the data collection procedures were progressing, the college students were familiar with change factors of classification tasks and in the case of pictures the classification strategy showed more desirable changes.
참고문헌 (56)
- 권용주, "대학생들의 귀납적 탐구에서 나타난 과학적 사고의 유형과 과정", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), pp.286~298 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 성태제, "타당도와 신뢰도", pp.154~163 (2005), 학지사
- 소광희, "학문의 이념과 분류" (1994), 민음사
- 신현정, "개념과 범주화", pp.1~114 (2002), 아카넷
- 양일호, "예비 초등 교사들의 분류 활동에서 나타난 분류 기준의 유형과 분류 전략의 특징", 초등과학교육, 27(1), pp.9~22 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이관용, "자극 유형이 범주화 방략의 선택에 미치는 영향:언어 자극과 그림 자극을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지, 8(2), pp.303~316 (1996)
- 임인숙, "유아의 인지양식과 분류개념과의 관계", 아동교육, 4(1), pp.158~183 (1994)
- 조은미, "생물 계통수 생성의 사고 과정 모형 개발", 생물교육, 33(1), pp.13~22 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 최현동, "초등학생과 대학생이 과학 관련 과제에서 사용한 분류 전략의 미시발생적 비교 분석", 박사, pp.2008
- 최현동, "초등학생 분류능력 발달의 경향성", 초등과학교육, 24(3), pp.281~291 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 최현동, "초등학교 6학년의 인공자극과 자연자극에 대한 분류 사고", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), pp.40~48 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- AAAS, "SAPA", pp.11~50 (1965), author
- AAAS, "Project 2061: Science for all Americans", pp.26~29 (1990), Oxford University Press
- Amsterlaw, K., "Theories of mind in transition: A microgenetic study of the development of false belief understanding. Manuscript submitted for publication", ~ (2004)
- Ausubel,D.P, "Educational psychology a cognitive view", pp.2~20 (1968), Holt Rinehart and Winston
- Bjorklund,D.F, "Children's thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences (4th ed.)", pp.2005, Wadsworth
- Bruner, J. S., "Studies in cognitive growth", pp.106~120 (1967), John Wiley and Sons
- Cohen, L., "Research methods in education (2th ed.)" (1985), Croom Helm
- Coyle, T. R, "Factor analysis of variability measures in eight independent samples of children and adults", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, pp.330~358 (2001)
- Diesendruck, G., "Mapping the similarity space of children and adults' artifact categories", Cognitive Development, 18, pp.217~231 (2003)
- Ericsson, K. A., "Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data revised edition", pp.1~106 (1993), The MIT Press
- Elementary Science Study, "Attribute games and problems" (1974), McGraw-Hill
- Flynn, E., "A longitudinal, microgenetic study of the emergence of false belief understanding and inhibition skills", Developmental Science, 7, pp.103~115 (2004)
- Gagné, R. H, "The condition of learning", pp.3~17 (1977), Holt Rinehart and Wiston
- Granott, N, "How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences. backward transitions. Zone of Current Development in Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning", pp.213~242 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Howe, A. C., "Engaging children in Science", pp.191~200 (1999), Macmillan Publishing Company
- Inhelder, B., "The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and Seriation", pp.47~58 (1964), Routledge
- Jaschek, C., "The classification of stars", pp.1~9 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Kaur, R, "Evaluation of the science process skills of observation and classification", 박사, pp.1973
- Klauer, K. J., "Inducing inductive reasoning: Does it transfer to fluid intelligence", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, pp.1~2 (2002)
- Kuhn,D, "Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us", Psychological Science, 6, pp.133~139 (1995)
- Lawson,A.E, "Science teaching and the development of thinking" (1995), International Thomson Publishing
- Lee. K., "Macro-and microdevelopmental research: Assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities in Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning", pp.243~265 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Lohse, G. L., "A classification of visual representations", Communications of the ACM, 37(12), pp.36~49 (1994)
- Lovell, K, "The growth of basic mathematical and scientific concepts in children (5th ed.)", pp.1~13 (1971), Unibools, University of London Press
- Miller, P. H., "Preschoolers' strategic behavior and performance on a same-different task", Journal of Experimental Child Psychloogy, 60, pp.284~303 (1995)
- Millikan, R. G, "On clear and confused ideas: An essay about substance concepts", pp.34~35 (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Opfer, J. E., "Revisiting preschoolers' living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology", Cognitive Psychology, 49, pp.301~332 (2004)
- Ostlund,K.L, "Science process skills: Assessing hand-on student performance" (1992), Addison- Wesley Publishing Company
- Parziale,J, "Observing the dynamics of construction: Children building bridges and new ideas in Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning", pp.157~180 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Schauble,L, "The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts", Developmental Psychology, 32, pp.102~119 (1996)
- Shimojo, S., "Pre-stere-optic binocular vision in infants", Vision Research, 26, pp.501~510 (1986)
- Siegler,R.S, "Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists", Child Development, 59, pp.833~851 (1988)
- Siegler,R.S, "How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation", Cognitive Psychology, 28, pp.225~273 (1995)
- Siegler,R.S, "Microgenetic analyses of learning in Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language 6th ed" (2006), John Wiley & Sons
- Siegler, R. S., "Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis", Cognitive Psychology, 36, pp.273~310 (1998)
- Siegler, R. S., "The microgenetic method - A direct means for studying cognitive development", American Psychologist, 46(6), pp.606~620 (1991)
- Siegler, R. S., "Studying change in developmental and neuropsychological contexts", Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, pp.321~350 (1994)
- Siegler, R. S., "A microgenetic analysis of conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, pp.377~387 (1998)
- Smith, E. E., "Categories and Concepts", pp.25~45 (1981), Harvard University Press
- Sokal,R.R, "Concept formation in Thinking, readings in cognitive science", pp.1~14 (1980), Cambridge University Press
- Spencer, J. P., "Posture and the emergence of manual skills", Developmental Science, 3, pp.216~233 (2000)
- Sutherland, P, "Cognitive development today", pp.1~12 (1992), Paul Chapman Publishing
- van Someren, M. W., "The think aloud method: A Practical guide to modeling cognitive processes", pp.1~12 (1994), Academic Press
- Vygotski,L, "The collected works of L. N. Vygotski", pp.1~15 (1987), Plenum
- Wolfinger,D.M, "Science in the elementary and middle school", pp.75~84 (2000), Addison Wesley Longman