초등 영재학생과 일반학생들의 지구과학 영역에서 과학 글쓰기에 대한 분석
An analysis of Scientific Writing about Earth Science Area by Gifted and Average Elementary School Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With five gifted and nine average elementary school students, this study attempted to make a comparative analysis on the characteristics of their scientific writings for earth science-related topics. The analysis found that all of the gifted students showed higher scores than the average in the writing sections of scientific nature, logical nature and creativity. Compared to the average scores, their creativity scores were far higher. By comparing and analyzing the predicates in the writings two groups wrote, I found that the gifted students used more sentences per topic than the average students. Both groups wrote the most numbers of sentences for Volcano-related topics. In the meantime, the gifted children used the least numbers of sentences for the related topics to atmospheric pollution and the average students did so for the related topics to fossils. By the analysis on the patterns of predicate, it was observed that both groups used material predicates most and verbal predicates least. As far as the second most used predicates are concerned, the gifted children used relational predicates and the average students used mental predicates.
Abstract
With five gifted and nine average elementary school students, this study attempted to make a comparative analysis on the characteristics of their scientific writings for earth science-related topics. The analysis found that all of the gifted students showed higher scores than the average in the writing sections of scientific nature, logical nature and creativity. Compared to the average scores, their creativity scores were far higher. By comparing and analyzing the predicates in the writings two groups wrote, I found that the gifted students used more sentences per topic than the average students. Both groups wrote the most numbers of sentences for Volcano-related topics. In the meantime, the gifted children used the least numbers of sentences for the related topics to atmospheric pollution and the average students did so for the related topics to fossils. By the analysis on the patterns of predicate, it was observed that both groups used material predicates most and verbal predicates least. As far as the second most used predicates are concerned, the gifted children used relational predicates and the average students used mental predicates.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강성주, "중학교 1학년 과학 영재의 가설-연역적 탐구 실험 글쓰기 유형 분석", 영재교육연구, 21(2), pp.309~335 (2011), 한국영재학회
- 강훈식, "물질의 입자적 성질에 대한 다중 표상 학습에서 외적 표상들 간의 연계와 통합을 촉진시키는 방안으로서의 그리기와 쓰기", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), pp.533~540 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 강훈식, "다중 표상 학습에 적용한 그리기와 쓰기에서시각적 정보의 형태에 따른 교수 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.367~375 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 맹승호, "수업 담화 장르에 기반한 광물과 암석 단원 과학 수업의 양태 변화 : 담화 리지스터와 언어 코드적 접근", 박사, pp.2008
- 박은희, "초등 분야 과학논술대회 참가자들의 과학 글쓰기 능력 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.385~394 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 박은희, "과학 글쓰기 교수·학습 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 석사, pp.2007
- 손정우, "과학글쓰기를 통한 과학영재학생들의 과학적 사고력과 창의적 문제 해결력 연구", 1(3), pp.21~32 (2009), 한국과학영재교육학회
- 손정우, "영재 선발을 위한 초인지 사고 수준에 따른 학생들의 과학글쓰기 경향성 분석", 영재교육연구, 20(1), pp.131~150 (2010), 한국영재학회
- 윤초희, "지적으로 우수한 영재아의 형식적 사고, 초인지 및 창의력에 관한 연구", 교육심리연구, 18(1), pp.241~260 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
- 이은경, "과학 영재들의 문제해결과정에서 나타나는 탐구적 글쓰기 및 언어적 상호작용의 특성에 대한 사례 연구", 박사, 화학교육, pp.2010
- 이호진, "과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 초등학생들의 선행개념 및 오개념", 교과교육학연구, 8, pp.421~435 (2004)
- 정혁, "빛을 주제로 한 11학년 학생의과제 유형에 따른 글쓰기 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.1008~1017 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 차현정, "장르와 레지스터 분석에서 나타난 중학생의 지구과학 주제 글쓰기의 언어적 특징", 한국지구과학회지, 32(1), pp.84~98 (2011), 한국지구과학회
- 함석진, "‘과학동아’ 지구과학 기사의 언어적 특성으로 본 과학 잡지의 과학 대중화 기제", 한국지구과학회지, 31(1), pp.51~62 (2010), 한국지구과학회
- Akkus. R., "Comparing an inquiry- based approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic to traditional science teaching practices : Are there differences?", International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), pp.1745~1765 (2007)
- Burke, K. A., "Implementing the science writing heuristic in chemisty laboratory", Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), pp.1032~1038 (2006)
- Cavagnetto, A., "The Nature of Elementary Student Science Discourse in the Context of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach", International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), pp.427~449 (2010)
- Chaopricha, S., "Coauthoring as learning and enculturation: a study of writing in biochemistry", 박사, pp.1997
- Fang, Z., "Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective", Science Education, 89(5), pp.335~347 (2005)
- Fang, Z., "The language demands of science reading in middle school", International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), pp.491~520 (2006)
- Hodson, D., "Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach", pp.154~167 (1998), Open University Press
- Keys, C. W., "Languageas an Indicator of Meaning Generation: An Analysis of Middle School Students' Written Discourse about Scientific Investigations", International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), pp.1044~1061 (1999)
- Keys, C. W., "Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), pp.676~690 (2000)
- Klein, P., "Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn", Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), pp.203~270 (1999)
- O’oole, M., "Science, schools, children and books: Exploring the classroom interface between science and language", Studies in Science Education, 28, pp.113~143 (1996)
- Prain, V., "Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), pp.179~201 (2006)
- Yore, L. D., "Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), pp.676~690 (2004)