상호작용에 따른 논증수업이 고등학생들의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향
The Effect of the Argumentation Lessons according to Interaction on High School Studentsʼ Academic Achievement
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to find out the argument structure which appears in the type of argument class (teacher- and student-centered) of the high school. The argument structure was compared and analyzed according to analyzing the study achievement and verified the academic achievement related to climate change. The results are listed below. First, the student-centered class is more effective method through the result that analyzed the class type of the teacher in argument-centered class. This result is to suggest more effective method to revitalize the argument activity of students-centered class which students plan for themselves and find more various materials. Second, teacher-centered class is more effective in contrast with argument analysis in the academic achievement test. While this is why the teacher-centered class utilizes an essential data necessary to curriculum in the argumentation, the elements to form the argument increased because students utilized the materials with their interest and concern in the process of proving in the student-centered class. Through the results of the research, it is necessary to develop the argument-centered programs for the science class and the curriculum-centered materials for argument class activity.
Abstract
This study aims to find out the argument structure which appears in the type of argument class (teacher- and student-centered) of the high school. The argument structure was compared and analyzed according to analyzing the study achievement and verified the academic achievement related to climate change. The results are listed below. First, the student-centered class is more effective method through the result that analyzed the class type of the teacher in argument-centered class. This result is to suggest more effective method to revitalize the argument activity of students-centered class which students plan for themselves and find more various materials. Second, teacher-centered class is more effective in contrast with argument analysis in the academic achievement test. While this is why the teacher-centered class utilizes an essential data necessary to curriculum in the argumentation, the elements to form the argument increased because students utilized the materials with their interest and concern in the process of proving in the student-centered class. Through the results of the research, it is necessary to develop the argument-centered programs for the science class and the curriculum-centered materials for argument class activity.
참고문헌 (18)
- Abell, S, "into inquiry learning and teaching in science", pp.100~199 (2000), American Association for the Advancement of Science
- Aufschnaiter, C. V, "Arguing to learn and learning to argue:case studies of how student’s argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), pp.101~131 (2008)
- Chin, C, "Students’ questions and discursive interaction: their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discusstions in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), pp.883~908 (2010)
- Driver, R, "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R. A, "Understanding dialogic argumentation among middle school science students", the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association (1999)
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P, "“Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
- Jonassen, D. H, "Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes", Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), pp.69~69 (1997)
- Landis, J. R, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33(1), pp.159~174 (1977)
- Lee, Gyoung-Rok, "Analysis of argumentation factors in the scientific inquiry activities of the 11th grade students", 석사, pp.2008
- McNeill, K. L, "Supporting students’ construction of scienctific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials", The journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), pp.153~191 (2006)
- National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education" (2012), National Academies Press
- Newton, P, "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- Osborne, J, "Enhancing the quality of argumentation is school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Simon, S, "Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2&3), pp.235~260 (2006)
- Song, Mi-Sun, "Analysis on the level of gifted elementary school students' argument", 석사, pp.2009
- Sung, Taeje, "Athletics rational discussion on methods and problems of practical exam", Journal of Education Evaluation, 3(2), pp.126~130 (1989)
- Toulmin, S. E, "The uses of argument", pp.87~134 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Wolf, F. M, "Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis" (1986), Sage