본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중학교 과학과 IPER 수업과 PBL 수업이 학업성취도 및 자기주도적 학습 특성에 미치는 효과

The Effects of IPER and PBL on Academic Achievement of Science and Self-directed Learning Characteristics in Middle School Science

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Modern society requires people with practical knowledge that is able to recognize actual problems in the complex reality and solve the problems. Due to that reason, the 7th National Curriculum aims to basically cultivate ability adaptable to information-oriented global age by maximizing students’ individuality and creativity. However, as existing education is hard to improve creativity, logical thinking, information processing skills, and problem-solving ability in the information-oriented age, self-directed learning is getting highlighted. Therefore, this study aimed to look into how learner-oriented IPER for self-directed learning and problem-based learning(PBL) in middle school science affected academic achievement of science and self-directed learning characteristics. As the results of the study are as follows. First, as the result of pre-and post-test to compare and analyze the effects of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model on learners’ academic achievement increase, it showed that the class with IPER instruction model was more effective. Second, as the result of pre-and post-test to compare and analyze the effects of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model on self-directed learning characters, IPER was more effective than PBL overall, and among sub-areas, ‘openness’, ‘self-concept’, ‘initiative’, ‘future-oriented self-understanding’, and ‘self-evaluation’ were more effective in IPER while ‘creativity’ was more effective in PBL. However, among sub-areas ‘responsibility’ and ‘learning enthusiasm’ didn’t show statistically significant difference. Third, the results of the post-survey to compare and analyze learners’ perception regarding the application of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model, the two models were positively affective. In addition, as the result of comparing the two models, IPER was more positive than PBL.

Abstract

Modern society requires people with practical knowledge that is able to recognize actual problems in the complex reality and solve the problems. Due to that reason, the 7th National Curriculum aims to basically cultivate ability adaptable to information-oriented global age by maximizing students’ individuality and creativity. However, as existing education is hard to improve creativity, logical thinking, information processing skills, and problem-solving ability in the information-oriented age, self-directed learning is getting highlighted. Therefore, this study aimed to look into how learner-oriented IPER for self-directed learning and problem-based learning(PBL) in middle school science affected academic achievement of science and self-directed learning characteristics. As the results of the study are as follows. First, as the result of pre-and post-test to compare and analyze the effects of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model on learners’ academic achievement increase, it showed that the class with IPER instruction model was more effective. Second, as the result of pre-and post-test to compare and analyze the effects of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model on self-directed learning characters, IPER was more effective than PBL overall, and among sub-areas, ‘openness’, ‘self-concept’, ‘initiative’, ‘future-oriented self-understanding’, and ‘self-evaluation’ were more effective in IPER while ‘creativity’ was more effective in PBL. However, among sub-areas ‘responsibility’ and ‘learning enthusiasm’ didn’t show statistically significant difference. Third, the results of the post-survey to compare and analyze learners’ perception regarding the application of IPER instruction model and PBL instruction model, the two models were positively affective. In addition, as the result of comparing the two models, IPER was more positive than PBL.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 강명희, "온라인 교육에서 문제중심학습 원리를 적용 할 때에 나타나는 수행과정의 특성", 교육정보미디어연구(구 교육정보방송연구), 4(1), pp.18~40 (1998)
  2. 강인애, "PBL과 ‘성찰저널(reflective journal)’-‘삼성전자의 변화 유도형 리더십 개발을 위한 팀리더 과정’ 사례-", 산업교육연구, 4, pp.3~27 (1998)
  3. 강인애, "왜 구성주의인가?" (2000), 문음사
  4. 신교육 체제 수립을 위한 교육개혁보고서, "교육개혁위원회", 교육개혁위원회, ~ (1996)
  5. 사회과 교육과정, , 1997
  6. 교육부, "과학과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제 1997-15호별책9)" (1997), 대한교과서
  7. 김정민, "고등학교 생물수업에서 자기 주도적 학습을 위한 학습자 중심 IPER모델의 학습효과", 박사, 생물교육학, pp.2008
  8. 대한지구과학교육학회, "지구과학교육론" (2009), 교육과학사
  9. 백영균, "웹 기반학습의 설계" (2001), 양서원
  10. 신동기, "자기주도적 학습이 학습과제 유형별 학업성취 및 학습태도에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.1998
  11. 오화선, "교과 통합 프로젝트 학습이 초등학교 아동의 자기주도적 학습능력과 학습태도에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2004
  12. 주국영, "과학의 수준별 WBI가 자기주도적 학습특성과 학업성취도에 미치는 효과", 박사, pp.2001
  13. Problem based learning in secondary schools, "Barrows, H", Spring- -field, IL: Problem Based Springfield, IL: Problem Based Learning Institute, Lanphier School, and Southern Illinois University Medical School, ~ (1993)
  14. Duffy, T., "constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation", pp.195~ (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  15. Guglielmino, L. M., "Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale", 박사, pp.1977

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)