본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Type 1 Study, Gage R&R Study와 ISO 22514-7의 측정능력지수 간 연관성 분석

Some Relationships between Measurement Capability Indices of Type 1 Study, Gage R&R Study, and ISO 22514-7

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: This paper reviews Type 1 Gage study, Gage R&R study, and procedure of ISO 22514-7 for assessing a measurement system, and discusses some relationships between the measurement capability indices. Methods: The gage capability index Cg of Type 1 Gage study, precision-to-tolerance ratio PTR of Gage R&R study, and measurement performance ratio Qms and Qmp of ISO 22514-7 are considered in this paper. Results: This paper derives the relationships between Cg and Qms, PTR and Qmp, and Qms and Qmp, respectively, and discusses the acceptance conditions for each procedures. Conclusion: The measurement capability analysis is the first step for the quality improvement of the manufacturing processes. Therefore the result of this study provides a helpful guidelines for assessing the measurement system, enabling proper evaluation of manufacturing processes.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper reviews Type 1 Gage study, Gage R&R study, and procedure of ISO 22514-7 for assessing a measurement system, and discusses some relationships between the measurement capability indices. Methods: The gage capability index Cg of Type 1 Gage study, precision-to-tolerance ratio PTR of Gage R&R study, and measurement performance ratio Qms and Qmp of ISO 22514-7 are considered in this paper. Results: This paper derives the relationships between Cg and Qms, PTR and Qmp, and Qms and Qmp, respectively, and discusses the acceptance conditions for each procedures. Conclusion: The measurement capability analysis is the first step for the quality improvement of the manufacturing processes. Therefore the result of this study provides a helpful guidelines for assessing the measurement system, enabling proper evaluation of manufacturing processes.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Al-Rafaie, Abbas., "Evaluating Measurement and Process Capabilities by GR&R with Four Quality Measures", Measurement, 43, pp.842~851 (2010)
  2. Automotive Industry Action Group(AIAG), "Measurement Systems Analysis" (2010)
  3. Bosch., "Bosch Booklet 10: Capability of Measurement and Test Procedures" (2003)
  4. 장무성, "비정규 측정오차의 경우 측정시스템 변동과 PTR 추정", 품질경영학회지, 35(1), pp.10~19 (2007), 한국품질경영학회
  5. "Measurement Systems Specification Document: SP-Q-MSS" (2010)[URL]
  6. International Organization for Standardization(ISO)., "ISO", IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, 2005
  7. International Organization for Standardization(ISO), ". ISO", IEC Guide 99, International Vocabulary of Metrology — Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM), 2007
  8. International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO", IEC Guide 98-3, Guide to the Expression of the Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), 2008
  9. International Organization for Standardization(ISO), "ISO 22514-7, Statistical Methods in Process Management - Capability and Performance - Part 7: Capability of Measurement Processes", ~ (2012)
  10. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, "KS Q ISO 22514-1, Statistical Methods in Process Management - Capability and Performance - Part 1: General Principles and Concepts", ~ (2012)
  11. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, "KS Q ISO 22514-2, Statistical Methods in Process Management - Capability and Performance - Part 2: Process Capability and Performance of Time-Dependent Process Models", ~ (2014)
  12. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, "KS Q ISO 22514-3, Statistical Methods in Process Management - Capability and Performance - Part 3: Machine Performance Studies for Measured Data on Discrete Parts", ~ (2011)
  13. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, "KS Q ISO", TR 22514-4, Statistical Methods in Process Management - Capability and Performance - Part 4: Process Capability Estimates and Performance Measures, 2011
  14. Lee, Seung-Hoon., "A Statistical Software for Measurement Systems Analysis", Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 28, pp.175~195 (2000)
  15. Majeske, Karl D., "Evaluating Measurement Systems and Manufacturing Processes Using Three Quality Measures", Quality Engineering, 15, pp.243~251 (2002)
  16. 서순근, "측정시스템 분석을 위한 2차원 척도 평가", 품질경영학회지, 42(4), pp.607~616 (2014), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  17. Verband der Automobilindustrie(VDA), "VDA Volume 5 – Capability of Measurement Processes" (2011)
  18. White, T. Kelvin., "Two-Dimensional Guidelines for Measurement System Indices", Journal of Quality Technology, 27, pp.479~487 (2011)
  19. Woodall, William H., "Some Relationships between Gage R&R Criteria", Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 24, pp.99~106 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)