본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

SIPOC 개념을 활용한 성과지표 개발 모델

A Comprehensive Performance Indicators by SIPOC Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: In this study, we suggest the systematic and comprehensive model to develop PI(Performance Indicators) of the organization or the process. Methods: The model is developed theoretically by using SIPOC(Supplier, Input, Process, Output, Customer)approach which is a tool to analyze the process and is compared with existing models to develop PI or KPI(key performance indicators); financial indicators, BSC, IPOO(input, process, output, outcome), traditional QCD (quality, cost, delivery), and IOS(input, output system). Results: The model provides more systematic method to develop PI and more comprehensive set of PI pools for all kinds of hierarchical levels of process than any other models to develop PI or KPI. Conclusion: This model will provide useful tools for the managers and the organizations who wish to develop PI.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we suggest the systematic and comprehensive model to develop PI(Performance Indicators) of the organization or the process. Methods: The model is developed theoretically by using SIPOC(Supplier, Input, Process, Output, Customer)approach which is a tool to analyze the process and is compared with existing models to develop PI or KPI(key performance indicators); financial indicators, BSC, IPOO(input, process, output, outcome), traditional QCD (quality, cost, delivery), and IOS(input, output system). Results: The model provides more systematic method to develop PI and more comprehensive set of PI pools for all kinds of hierarchical levels of process than any other models to develop PI or KPI. Conclusion: This model will provide useful tools for the managers and the organizations who wish to develop PI.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Badiru, A. J., "Practitioner’s Guide to Quality and Process Improvement" (1993), Chapman & Hall
  2. 정규석, "I-O 시스템을 이용한 성과지표 개발 모델 및 BSC와의 통합 활용 방법에 관한 연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 22(4), pp.399~415 (2011), 한국생산관리학회
  3. Chung, Kyu Suk, "The Development of Process Quality Indicators", Korean Society for Quality Management, Autumn Symposium Proceeding, pp.127~136 (1996)
  4. Fisher, J., "Use of Non-financial Measures", Journal of Cost Management, (Spring), pp.31~48 (1992)
  5. Guidelines for Project Evaluation and Research on the Introduction of PART, "Geon, Tae-seung", Korea Institute of Public Finance, ~ (2004)
  6. Ghalayini, A. M., "The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(8), pp.63~80 (1996)
  7. Gupta, Y. G., "Flexibility of manufacturing systems : concepts and measurements", European Journal of Operational Research, 43(2), pp.119~148 (1989)
  8. Hayes, D., "A Contingency Theory of Managerial Accounting", The Accounting Review, 52, pp.22~39 (1977)
  9. Holmstrom, B., "Multitask Principal-agent Analysis : Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design", Journal of Law, Economice and Organization, 7, pp.24~52 (1991)
  10. Hopwood, A. G., "Accounting and Human Behavior" (1974), Haymarket Publishing
  11. Hyeon, Jae-ho, "Flexibility of Manufacturing System: Analytical Approach", 박사, pp.1992
  12. Iittner, C. D., "Total Quality Management and Choice of Information and Reward Systems", Journal of Accounting Research, 33(Supplement), pp.1~34 (1998)
  13. ISO, "ISO 8402", ~ (1994)
  14. Juran, J. M., "Quality Planning and Analysis, 3rd ed" (1993), McGraw-Hill Inc
  15. Kaplan, R. S., "The Balanced Scorecard : Measures That Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, 70(1), pp.71~79 (1992)
  16. Kaplan, R. S., "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic management System", Harvard Business Review, 74(1), pp.75~85 (1996)
  17. Kaplan, R. S., "Having Trouble with your Strategy? Then Map It", Harvard Business Review, 78(5), pp.167~176 (2000)
  18. Kemps, R. R., "Project Performance Measurement" (1992), Humphreys & Associates, Inc.
  19. Lillis, A. M., "Managing Multiple Dimensions of Manufacturing Performance : An Exploratory Study", Accounting, Organization, and Society, 27(6), pp.497~529 (2002)
  20. Lipe, M. G., "The Balanced Scorecard : Judgemental Effect of Common and Unique Performance Measures", The Accounting Review, 75(3), pp.283~298 (2000)
  21. Moers, F., "Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation : The Impact of Diversity and Subjectivity", Accounting, Organization and Society, 30(1), pp.67~80 (2005)
  22. Neely, A., "Performance Measurement Design : A Literature Review and Research Agenda", International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 15(4), pp.80~116 (1995)
  23. NIST, "Baldrige National Quality Program" (2010), Criteria for Performance
  24. Performance Based Budgeting and Development of Performance Indicators, the Research on Performance Management and Project Evaluation, "Pak, Gi-baek", Korea Institute of Public Finance, ~ (2004)
  25. Porter, M. E., "Competitive Advantage" (1985), Free Press
  26. Ria, Anthony P., "Managing by Objectives" (1974), Foresman and Company
  27. Slack, Nigel, "Operation Management" (1995), Pitman Publishing
  28. Scott, W., "Performance Management and Managerial Teams", Accounting, Organization and Society, 24, pp.263~285 (1999)
  29. Thompson J. D., "Organization in Action" (1967), McGraw-Hill
  30. Van der stede, W. A., "Strategy, Choice Performance measures, and Performance", Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18, pp.185~205 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)