수정된 Kano 모델을 이용한 프로젝트의 위험요인 연구
Analysis of the Project Risk Factors Using Modified Kano Model
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This paper examines risk factors which affect project success, and proposes a method utilizing the average potential satisfaction index(API) to evaluate how much the satisfaction level of the personnel involved in the project can change by reducing the risk. Methods: The current study derives 11 risk factors affecting project success from literature review and conducts survey of 253 subjects who have project work experience. A modified Kano's questionnaire using 5-point Likert-scale is applied to investigate the amount of satisfaction or dissatisfaction when the risk factors are reducted or not, respectively. Results: The respondents consider that the risk factors which include the three elements of project management(schedule, quality, cost) is more important than other risk factors related to the project environment,and technology and profitability. Conclusion: The average potential satisfaction index proposed in this study can measure the perception on the risk factors of the personnel involved in the project, since it has a strong correlation with the perceived importance by the respondents in this study.
Abstract
Purpose: This paper examines risk factors which affect project success, and proposes a method utilizing the average potential satisfaction index(API) to evaluate how much the satisfaction level of the personnel involved in the project can change by reducing the risk. Methods: The current study derives 11 risk factors affecting project success from literature review and conducts survey of 253 subjects who have project work experience. A modified Kano's questionnaire using 5-point Likert-scale is applied to investigate the amount of satisfaction or dissatisfaction when the risk factors are reducted or not, respectively. Results: The respondents consider that the risk factors which include the three elements of project management(schedule, quality, cost) is more important than other risk factors related to the project environment,and technology and profitability. Conclusion: The average potential satisfaction index proposed in this study can measure the perception on the risk factors of the personnel involved in the project, since it has a strong correlation with the perceived importance by the respondents in this study.
참고문헌 (30)
- Atkinson RW, "Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria", International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp.337~342 (1999)
- Barki, H., "An integrative contingency model of software project risk management", Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), pp.37~69 (2001)
- Bell, T. E, "Managing Murphy's law : engineering a minimum-risk system", IEEE Spectrum, 26(6), pp.24~27 (1989)
- Berger, C., "Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), pp.2~36 (1993)
- Boehm, B., "Software Risk Management Tutorial" (1989), IEEE Computer Society Press
- Cadotte, E. R., "Dissatisfiers and Satisfiers: Suggestions from Consumer Complaints and Compliments", Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 1, pp.74~79 (1988)
- Cooke-Davies, T, "The “real” success factors on projects", International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), pp.185~190 (2002)
- Gauld, R, "Public sector information system project failure: Lessons from a New Zealand hosptial organization", Government Information Quarterly, 24, pp.102~114 (2007)
- Grey, S., "Practical risk assessment for project management" (1995), John Wiley & Sons
- 장흥엽, "ASC를 이용한 품질특성의 중요도 결정", 품질경영학회지, 40(4), pp.589~598 (2012), 한국품질경영학회
- Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Hinshitsu, 14(2), pp.67~156 (1984)
- Kerzner, H., "Project management: a system approach to planning scheduling and controlling" (1989), Van Nostrand Reinhold
- Lee, M., "Applying the Kano methodology in managing NASA's science research program", Center for Quality and Management Journal, 5(3), pp.13~20 (1996)
- 임성욱, "Kano 모델을 기반으로 한 잠재적 고객만족 개선지수", 품질경영학회지, 38(2), pp.248~260 (2010), 한국품질경영학회
- Löfgren, M., "Two decades of using Kano’s theory of attractive quality: a literature review", Quality Management Journal, 15(1), pp.59~75 (2008)
- Lucas, H., "Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Munns, A. K., "The role of project management in achieving project success", International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), pp.81~87 (1996)
- Peter, E. D. Love, "The egnima of evaluation: benefits, costs and risks of IT in Australian small-medium-sized enterprises", Information & Management (2004)
- Porter, M. E, "Towards a dynamic theory of strategy", Strategic management journal, 12(S2), pp.95~107 (2007)
- Sauer, C., "The IMPACT of SIZE and VOLATILITY ON IT PROJECT PERFORMANCE", Communications of the ACM, 5(11), pp.79~84 (2007)
- Schmidt, R., "Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study", Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), pp.5~36 (2001)
- Song, H. G., "A B-W model for managing quality attributes", 박사, pp.2013
- 송해근, "Kano 모델의 설문 워딩에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 40(4), pp.453~466 (2012), 한국품질경영학회
- Thomas, G., "Success in IT projects: a matter of definition?", International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), pp.33~42
- Thompson, R. L., "The linkage between reporting quality" (2007)
- Wang, S. Q., "Evaluation and management of political risks in China’s BOT projects", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), pp.242~250 (2000)
- Wateridge, J, "How can IS", IT Projects be measured for success, 1997, pp.16(1), 59~63
- Wideman, R. M., "Management", Project Management Journal, 17(4), pp.20~26 (1986)
- Wit, A. D, "Measurement of project success", International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), pp.164~170 (1988)
- Zmud, RW, "Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature", Management Science, 25(10), pp.966~979 (1979)