본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

DEMATEL 기법을 활용한 프로젝트 관리 성공을 저해하는 장애요인 간의 영향 관계 분석

Analyzing the Influence Relationship between Barriers to Success of Project Management Using DEMATEL Method

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

There is an increasing need for complex and large projects to be carried out quickly. As the duration, size, and cost of the project increase, concerns about project failure are also rising. Finding factors that hinder the performance of an effective project and eliminating them in advance or controlling and managing them more effectively can be a more direct way to secure the success of the project. Previous studies have identified compositional dimensions that are classified according to attributes, covering the various obstacles that affect the success of the project through existing literature. It is a follow-up to previous research. Using DEMATEL techniques, we would like to propose to explore the appropriate measures that an entity and organization can take by identifying the causality between factors through cross-impact analysis of project disabilities and even presenting factors that may arise when they are identified. As a result of the analysis, according to the indicators to evaluate the importance, 8 factors were found to be relatively important factors, excluding the factors that Failure of project feasibility analysis and Technical environment change. In addition, 5 factors were found to be causative factors; Technical environment change, Unclarity project plan, Strategic consistency error, Inaccuracy of requirement definition, and Failure of project feasibility analysis. In contrast, the remaining 5 factors were found to be the result factors; Lack of benefits realization, Negative attitude of top management, Stakeholder conflict, Difficulty of process management, and Disturbance of communication.

Abstract

There is an increasing need for complex and large projects to be carried out quickly. As the duration, size, and cost of the project increase, concerns about project failure are also rising. Finding factors that hinder the performance of an effective project and eliminating them in advance or controlling and managing them more effectively can be a more direct way to secure the success of the project. Previous studies have identified compositional dimensions that are classified according to attributes, covering the various obstacles that affect the success of the project through existing literature. It is a follow-up to previous research. Using DEMATEL techniques, we would like to propose to explore the appropriate measures that an entity and organization can take by identifying the causality between factors through cross-impact analysis of project disabilities and even presenting factors that may arise when they are identified. As a result of the analysis, according to the indicators to evaluate the importance, 8 factors were found to be relatively important factors, excluding the factors that Failure of project feasibility analysis and Technical environment change. In addition, 5 factors were found to be causative factors; Technical environment change, Unclarity project plan, Strategic consistency error, Inaccuracy of requirement definition, and Failure of project feasibility analysis. In contrast, the remaining 5 factors were found to be the result factors; Lack of benefits realization, Negative attitude of top management, Stakeholder conflict, Difficulty of process management, and Disturbance of communication.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Ali, U., "Barriers to Effective Configuration Management Application in a Project Context: An Empirical Investigation", International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), pp.508~518 (2014)
  2. Amiri, M., "Developing a DEMATEL method to prioritize distribution centers in supply chain", Management Science Letters, 1(3), pp.279~288 (2011)
  3. Atkinson, R., "Project Management: Cost, Time and Quality, Two Best Guesses and a Phenomenon, Its Time to Accept Other Success Criteria", International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp.337~342 (1999)
  4. Callistus, T., "Evaluating Barriers to Effective Implementation of Project Monitoring and Evaluation in the Ghanaian Construction Industry", Procedia Engineering, 164, pp.389~394 (2016)
  5. Dai, C.X., "An Exploration of Project Management Office Features and Their Relationship to Project Success", International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), pp.523~532 (2004)
  6. Elonen, S., "Problems in Managing Internal Development Projects in Multi-Project Environments", International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), pp.395~402 (2003)
  7. Falatoonitoosi, E., "Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory", Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(13), pp.3476~3480 (2013)
  8. World Problems an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL, "Gabus, A.", Battelle Geneva Research Centre, ~ (1972)
  9. Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility, "Gabus, A.", Battelle Geneva Research Centre, ~, pp.DEMATEL Report No.1 (1973)
  10. 허상무, "DEMATEL 기법과 내용분석을 이용한 임베디드 소프트웨어 결함요소 간의 영향 관계 분석", 한국정보기술학회논문지, 16(6), pp.9~24 (2018), 한국정보기술학회[DOI]
  11. Kim, Y., "Study on impact mechanism for beef cattle farming and importance of evaluating agricultural information in Korea using DEMATEL, PCA and AHP", Agricultural Information Research, 15(3), pp.267~280 (2006)
  12. 이아연, "프로젝트 관리의 성공에 영향을 미치는 장애요인", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 43(3), pp.179~190 (2020), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
  13. Tseng, M.L., "Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2009)
  14. Muller, R., "Critical Success Factors in Projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott: The Elucidation of Project Success", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), pp.757~775 (2012)
  15. Muller, R., "The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project", European Management Journal, 25(4), pp.298~309 (2007)
  16. Sara, J., "Assessing Relative Importance and Mutual Influence of Barriers for CCS Deployment of The ROAD Project Using AHP and DEMATEL Methods", International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 41, pp.336~357 (2015)
  17. Scarbrough, H., "The Processes of Project-based Learning An Exploratory Study", Management Learning, 35(4), pp.491~506 (2004)
  18. Shieh, J. I., "A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality", Knowledge-Based System, 23, pp.277~282 (2010)
  19. 송정택, "중소 SI기업의 프로젝트 관리 생산성 향상을 위한 평가와 진단", 한국생산관리학회지, 28(3), pp.251~271 (2017), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  20. Steven, A.R., "Listening to the Public:Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Sustainability:Sustainability Research Initiative" (2006), Viewpoint Learning
  21. Toor, S.U.R., "Beyond the “Iron Triangle”: Stakeholder Perception of Key Performance Indicators(KPIs) for Large-Scale Public Sector Development Projects", International Journal of Project Management, 28, pp.228~236 (2010)
  22. Tsai, W.H., "Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP", Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp.1444~1458 (2009)
  23. Tzeng, G. H., "Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL", Expert Systems with Applications, 32, pp.1028~1044 (2007)
  24. Wu, W.W., "Developing global managers’competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method", Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), pp.499~507 (2007)
  25. Wu, W.W., "Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach", Expert Systems with Applications, 35, pp.828~835 (2008)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)