중국 초기 산문의 ‘敎化性’ 특징과 그 장르적 계승관계 고찰
A Study on the Formation Process of a moral prose in Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that the genre containing “敎化性domestication,” one of the characteristics of China’s early pros, was expressed as “admonished and inscription(箴銘).” Even if the sentences before the letters were verbally transmitted and cited, if they expanded their vitality as one of the later genres, they can also be included in the realm of prose. The early edification sentences were pre-textual media but appeared as “testimony of truth” by the philosophers and scholars of the Warring States Period. However, the reason why these styles failed to spread to future generations is that they could not expand to individual genres as they were absorbed into the philosophers and scholars of the Warring States Period and media. This is because strong reason overwhelmed the transcendent world, and their language was superior to the language and power of the gods. The text before the writing reached the Han Dynasty secured its genre characteristics with “moral prose” called “admonished and inscription (箴銘)”, which maintained its vitality until the end of the Qing Dynasty.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that the genre containing “敎化性domestication,” one of the characteristics of China’s early pros, was expressed as “admonished and inscription(箴銘).” Even if the sentences before the letters were verbally transmitted and cited, if they expanded their vitality as one of the later genres, they can also be included in the realm of prose. The early edification sentences were pre-textual media but appeared as “testimony of truth” by the philosophers and scholars of the Warring States Period. However, the reason why these styles failed to spread to future generations is that they could not expand to individual genres as they were absorbed into the philosophers and scholars of the Warring States Period and media. This is because strong reason overwhelmed the transcendent world, and their language was superior to the language and power of the gods. The text before the writing reached the Han Dynasty secured its genre characteristics with “moral prose” called “admonished and inscription (箴銘)”, which maintained its vitality until the end of the Qing Dynasty.
참고문헌 (26)
- 劉勰, "文心雕龍注" (1958), 人民文學出版社
- 嚴可均, "全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文" (1958), 中華書局
- 劉禹錫, "劉禹錫集" (1975), 上海人民出版社
- "直指心體要節", 雕版印刷本1378年鷲巖寺刊行, 藏書閣所藏本, ~
- 尹乃鉉, "商周史" (1984), 민음사
- "文選" (1986), 上海古籍出版社
- 姚鼐, "古文辭類纂" (1998), 上海古籍出版社
- 郭預衡, "中國散文史(全3冊)" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 賈誼, "新书校注" (2007), 中華書局
- 鄭玄, "六藝論" (2009), 國家圖書館
- 정경주, "性齊許傳의 箴銘硏究", 文化傳統論集, 11 (2003), 경성대학교 한국학연구소
- 강민구, "朝鮮 後期 嶺南 士人 箴銘의 內向性과 觀念性", 漢文敎育論集, 26(1), pp.439~463 (2006), 한국한문교육학회
- 김성훈, "『고경중마방(古鏡重磨方)』과 수양론:'敬'을 강조한 箴· 銘작품을 중심으로", 崇實語文, 23 (2009)
- 김민나, "先秦兩漢六朝의 제사문과 서약문에 대한 논의 -《文心雕龍ㆍ銘箴》", 중국어문학지, (31), pp.311~328 (2009), 중국어문학회
- 김종철, "‘箴銘’에 나타나는 소통의 유형과 그 의미", 동방한문학, (65), pp.181~196 (2015), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 김윤규, "晦齋 箴銘의 내용과 성격 및 문학사적 의미", 동방한문학, (77), pp.289~332 (2018), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 辨疑, "文心雕龍·箴銘", 語文學刊 (2006)
- 吳承學, "箴銘類文體", 古典文學知識 (2009)
- "『文心雕龍·箴銘』銘文定義辨疑-從劉氏“論文敍筆”之四部說起,韩璐,圖書館理論與實踐实践", ~ (2011)
- 侯姸, "漢代箴銘文硏究", 碩士, pp.2012
- 周曉舟, "中唐箴銘文折射文人情懷", ~ (2016)
- 万光治, "汉代颂赞铭箴与赋同体异用", ~ (1986)
- 梁复明, "论汉代颂赞铭箴与汉赋的同体异用", 學術論壇 (2009)
- 唐辉, "论文化诗学与诗性文体——对『明诗』,『铭箴』卷组的一个宏观诠释", ~ (2006)
- 张甲子, "汉代铭文研究", 석사, pp.2010
- 张立兵, "论先秦两汉的颂,赞,箴,铭", 석사, pp.2004
