언론의 범죄보도에 있어 범죄피해자의 프라이버시권보호에 관한 연구
A study on the right to privacy of crime victim in Media
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The victim's privacy is the site where opposing interests collide against each other. Like the freedom of the press and the speech, each individual right to the privacy is already implied in the Constitution. The Consitutional right on the privacy is, however, limited to concepts such as the privacy in the person's residence and the woman's right to the abortion, but is not applied to keeping an individual's name private. Nonetheless, the victim scenario creates a serious privacy argument because of the horrific nature of the crime, the victim's permanent physical and mental injuries, and defense attorneys' frequent tactics to expose the promiscuity of the victim in a process to gain her involuntary consent to the crime. If the victim's name is released to the public, she comes to face embarrassment, anguish, and scrutiny by her peers. The media wants to publish the information, but the victim insists that it remain private. When the government or the court mistakenly releases this confidential information to the media, three firmly-rooted Constitutional interests oppose against each other. The media's First Amendment rights clash with the victim's privacy interest and the intention to protect victims. Thus, a court must determine which right prevails over others, based upon the confidential information that the media attempts to publish.
Abstract
The victim's privacy is the site where opposing interests collide against each other. Like the freedom of the press and the speech, each individual right to the privacy is already implied in the Constitution. The Consitutional right on the privacy is, however, limited to concepts such as the privacy in the person's residence and the woman's right to the abortion, but is not applied to keeping an individual's name private. Nonetheless, the victim scenario creates a serious privacy argument because of the horrific nature of the crime, the victim's permanent physical and mental injuries, and defense attorneys' frequent tactics to expose the promiscuity of the victim in a process to gain her involuntary consent to the crime. If the victim's name is released to the public, she comes to face embarrassment, anguish, and scrutiny by her peers. The media wants to publish the information, but the victim insists that it remain private. When the government or the court mistakenly releases this confidential information to the media, three firmly-rooted Constitutional interests oppose against each other. The media's First Amendment rights clash with the victim's privacy interest and the intention to protect victims. Thus, a court must determine which right prevails over others, based upon the confidential information that the media attempts to publish.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김철수, "헌법학신론" (2006), 박영사
- 언론의 범죄보도와 형사법적 문제점, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 프라이버시의 보호와 범죄자 신상공개, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2001)
- 한국언론의 범죄보도관행, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 김상균, "범죄보도 실태와 선정성에 관한 내용 분석-주요 4대 일간지를 대상으로 -", 한국공안행정행학회보, (7) (1998), 한국공안행정학회
- 김용세, "피해자학의 발전과 피해자보호의 최신 동향", 피해자학연구, 10(1), pp.137~172 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 류병관, "범죄피해자 진술권의 성격 및 내용에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.201~223 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 류병관, "성폭력 피해자 보호를 위한 증거제한에 관한 연구 － 미국의 강간피해자보호법(Rape Shield Law)을 중심으로", 법학논총, 28(1), pp.365~392 (2008), 법학연구소
- 류병관, "미국 강간죄에 있어 ‘저항’과 ‘동의’에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.429~454 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 류병관, "형사절차상 범죄피해자권리의 헌법적 보장에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.23~45 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 박도희, "언론보도에 의한 피해에 관한 소고－명예훼손을 중심으로－", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.171~195 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 박광배, "재판의 공정성을 훼손할 가능성이 있는 신문의 범죄보도행태에 대한 내용분석: 한국, 미국 및 네델랜드 신문의 비교", 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 (2001), 한국심리학회
- 정욱상, "범죄보도의 문제점과 그 대책", 한국공안행정행학회보, (7) (1998), 한국공안행정학회
- Amy L. Peikoff, "The Right to Privacy: Contemporary Reductions and Their Critics", Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L., 13, pp.474~ (2006)
- Brett Jarad Berlin, "Comment, Revealing the Constitutional Infirmities of the “Crime Victims Protection Act,” Florida's New Privacy Statute for Sexual Assault Victims", Fla. St. U. L. Rev, 23, pp.513~ (1995)
- Carey Haughwout, "Prohibiting Rape Victim Identification in the Media: Is it Constitutional?", U. Tol. L. Rev, 23, pp.735~ (1992)
- David E. Fiakow, "The Media's First Amendment Right And The Rape Victim's Right to Privacy: Where does One Right End And the Other Begin?", Suffolk U. L. Rev, 39, pp.745~ (2006)
- James Griffin, "The Human Right to Privacy", San Die해 L. Rev, 44, pp.697~ (2007)
- Jeffrey J. Pokorak, "Rape victims and Prosecutor: The Inevitable Ethical Conflict of Defacto Client", Attorney Relationships, 2007, pp.48, 695~
- Jennifer L. Hebert, "Mental health records in sexual assault cases : Striking a balance to ensure a fair trial for victims and defendants", Tex. L. Rev, 83, pp.1453~ (2005)
- Karin S. Portlock, "Status on Trial: The Racial Ramifications of Admitting Prostitution Evidence under State Rape Shield Legislation", Colum. L. Rev, 107, pp.1404~ (2007)
- Megan Reidy, "THE IMPACT OF MEDIA COVERAGE ON RAPE SHIELD LAWS IN HIGH-PROFILE CASES: IS THE VICTIM RECEIVING A FAIR TRIAL?", Cath. U. L. Rev, 54, pp.297~ (2004)
- Michelle Johnson, "Of Public Interest: How Courts Handle Rape Victims' Privacy Suits", COMM. L. & POL'Y, 4, pp.201~ (1999)
- Oriana Mazza, "Re-Examining Motions to Compel Psychological Evaluations of Sexual Assault Victims", St. John's L. Rev, 82, pp.763~ (2008)
- Sarah Tupper, "TAKING THE NINTH: A VICTIM'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY", Wash. U. J. L. & Pol'y, 28, pp.457~ (2008)
- 大月晶代, "犯罪被害者の情報と報道のあり方. in: レフアレンス" (2006)
- ジョン, "イギリスにおける報道被害と裁判外の救済方法（１）", 一橋法学, 6(1) (2007)