피해자참가제도의 바람직한 도입방안
A study on the introduction of Victim Participation System
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the Criminal Law Revision Committee in the Department of Justice offers the desirable introductions into our victim participation system by providing five provisions on criminal procedure act §§ 294-4 ~ 294-9(hereafter referred to as "revision" in this paper). This paper will be examined following: ⅰ) the necessity and legitimacy of its introduction in our criminal system; ii) the participation form of some representative countries enacting victim participation system; iii) the revision act of the Department of Justice. This act modified and based on the Japanese victim participation system is restrictedly assisted by victim within the limit of maintaining the inquisitorial approach in which criminal prosecution is undertaken by a state service. However, the revision act leaves room for blame. It is desirable we have to reach the compromise that our victim participation system should have milder authority over the victim than in German, but more powerful authority rather than in Japan. Furthermore, we suggest, at this point, some improvements like revision of the right of victim to make statement, adoption of public defender for victim participation, and etc.
Abstract
Recently, the Criminal Law Revision Committee in the Department of Justice offers the desirable introductions into our victim participation system by providing five provisions on criminal procedure act §§ 294-4 ~ 294-9(hereafter referred to as "revision" in this paper). This paper will be examined following: ⅰ) the necessity and legitimacy of its introduction in our criminal system; ii) the participation form of some representative countries enacting victim participation system; iii) the revision act of the Department of Justice. This act modified and based on the Japanese victim participation system is restrictedly assisted by victim within the limit of maintaining the inquisitorial approach in which criminal prosecution is undertaken by a state service. However, the revision act leaves room for blame. It is desirable we have to reach the compromise that our victim participation system should have milder authority over the victim than in German, but more powerful authority rather than in Japan. Furthermore, we suggest, at this point, some improvements like revision of the right of victim to make statement, adoption of public defender for victim participation, and etc.
참고문헌 (26)
- 범죄피해자 보호·지원에 관한 기본계획(2007-2011), "법무부", ~ (2006)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법개혁법률안" (2006)
- 김봉수, "새로운 형사재판에서 피해자의 권리보호", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.277~298 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 김영기, "피해자의 공판절차참가 도입방안 연구. in: 한국형사법학의 이론과 실천(정암 정성진박사 고희기념논문집)" (2010)
- 피해자의견진술제도에 관한 연구, "김지선", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 김창준, "중국 형사법의 범죄피해자에 대한 보호", 법학연구, (22) (2001), 전북대학교 법학연구소
- 도중진, "형사절차에서 범죄피해자에 대한 재고찰", 피해자학연구, 10(1), pp.173~209 (2002), 한국피해자학회
- 류병관, "범죄피해자 진술권의 성격 및 내용에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.201~223 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 박광민, "형사절차상 피해자의 지위강화", 형사법연구, (10) (1998)
- 박광민, "범죄피해자의 양형절차에의 참가", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.175~194 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 송광섭, "범죄피해자보호의 현황과 형사사법체계 내에서의 피해자보호방안", 저스티스, (82), pp.5~27 (2004), 한국법학원
- 안성수, "범죄피해자 보호의 제도적 강화방안", 형사법의 신동향, (16) (2008), 대검찰청
- 이승호, "개정 형사소송법상의 피해자진술권 제도에 대한 검토", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.57~80 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 이용식, "형사피해자의 지위에 대한 소고", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.5~22 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이재상, "형사절차상 피해자보호방안", 형사정책연구, 11 (1992)
- 이정민, "일본의 피해자 참가제도와 형사재판의 변화", 피해자학연구, 17(2), pp.35~57 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 범죄피해자의 공판절차참가, "정지영", 대검찰청, ~, pp.검찰미래기획단 연구보고서 26 (2010)
- 조균석, "형사재판절차에서의 범죄피해자참가제도의 도입 방안", 피해자학연구, 18(1), pp.5~29 (2010), 한국피해자학회
- 조준현, "형사절차에 있어서 피해자의 지위", 저스티스, 108, pp.201~227 (2008), 한국법학원
- 한생일, "부대공소제도 도입을 통한 범죄피해자의 권리강화", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 20 (2009)
- 酒卷匡, "犯罪被害者による意見の陳述について", 法曹, 52(11) (2000)
- 吉村眞性, "刑事手續にぉける被害者參加論", 被害者學硏究, (19) (2009), 日本被害者學會
- 椎橋隆幸, "裁判員裁判における被害者参加の意義", 刑事法ジャーナル, (16) (2009)
- 新屋達之, "被害者參加と部審員裁判", 法律時報, 81(1) (2009)
- 守屋克彦, "被害者参加について", 法学セミナー, (654) (2009)