근로자건강진단 폐활량검사에서 새로운 신뢰성기준 적용 결과
New Reliability Criteria for Korean Workers’ Health Examination Spirometry Results
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute is currently evaluating spirometry tests used for worker health examinations by applying the 2005 American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) spirometric test standardization guide and reviewing the application of the 2019 ATS/ERS guide. To compare results obtained using the new evaluation criteria with previous results and determine whether it is appropriate to apply them to Korean workers’ health examinations, we reviewed spirometry results from 325 special health examination institutions. Although evaluation criteria such as extrapolation volume, correction error, and forced inspiratory vital capacity were applied more strictly, institutions had higher reliability scores. Primarily because the acceptability and repeatability of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were judged separately, and thus, deduction width was reduced. The study shows that adopting the new evaluation criteria would reduce the possible use of inappropriate data, increase tester and doctor understanding of result selection and interpretation, increase result reliability, and reduce the testing burden.
Abstract
The Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute is currently evaluating spirometry tests used for worker health examinations by applying the 2005 American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) spirometric test standardization guide and reviewing the application of the 2019 ATS/ERS guide. To compare results obtained using the new evaluation criteria with previous results and determine whether it is appropriate to apply them to Korean workers’ health examinations, we reviewed spirometry results from 325 special health examination institutions. Although evaluation criteria such as extrapolation volume, correction error, and forced inspiratory vital capacity were applied more strictly, institutions had higher reliability scores. Primarily because the acceptability and repeatability of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were judged separately, and thus, deduction width was reduced. The study shows that adopting the new evaluation criteria would reduce the possible use of inappropriate data, increase tester and doctor understanding of result selection and interpretation, increase result reliability, and reduce the testing burden.
참고문헌 (20)
- "Occupational safety and health acts"[URL]
- Miller MR, "General considerations for lung function testing", Eur Respir J, 26, pp.153~161 (2005)[DOI]
- "Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society.", American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 152(3), pp.1107~1136 (1995), American Thoracic Society[DOI]
- Miller MR, "Standardisation of spirometry", Eur Respir J, 26, pp.319~338 (2005)[DOI]
- Townsend MC, "Spirometry in the occupational health setting--2011update", J Occup Environ Med, 53, pp.569~584 (2011)[DOI]
- van Schalkwyk EM, "Guideline for office spirometry in adults, 2004", S Afr Med J, 94(7 Pt 2), pp.576~587 (2004)
- Swanney MP, "Spirometry training courses : content, delivery and assessment-a position statement from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science", Respirology, 22, pp.1430~1435 (2017)[DOI]
- The COPD Guidelines Group of the Standards of Care Committee of the BTS, "BTS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", Thorax, (52 Suppl 5), pp.S1~S28 (1997)
- Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, "2016guidelines for lung function test", Medrang, 1~34 (2016)
- Guidelines for spirometry and interpretation, "Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA)", KOSHA, 5~60 (2021)
- Pellegrino R, "Interpretative strategies for lung function tests", Eur Respir J, 26, pp.948~968 (2005)[DOI]
- Current status of and measures to standardize spirometry findings in special health examinations, "Won YL", Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, 37~50 (2019)
- Miller MR, "Standardisation of lung function testing : the authors’ replies to readers’ comments", Eur Respir J, 36, pp.1496~1498 (2010)[DOI]
- Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI), "Guidelines for workers’ health examination - volume 1: overview of special health examination", OSHRI, 80~88 (2012)
- Graham BL, "Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 200, pp.e70~e88 (2019)[DOI]
- Koo TK, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", J Chiropr Med, 15, pp.155~163 (2017)[DOI]
- Moore VC, "Spirometry : step by step", Breathe, 8, pp.232~240 (2012)[DOI]
- Townsend MC, "Spirometry in occupational health-2020", J Occup Environ Med, 62, pp.e208~e230 (2020)[DOI]
- Culver BH, "Recommendations for a standardized pulmonary function report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 196, pp.1463~1472 (2017)[DOI]
- Improvement of quality control standards in the field of spirometry for Workers’s Specific Health Examinations, "Lee JH", Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, 80~81 (2022)