본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기독교 팀기반학습 (Team Based Learning) 모형개발 -반다이크의 ‘다기능 학급(Multifunctional Classroom)’을 중심으로-

The Development of a Model for Christian Team Based Learning

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기독교적 협력 학급을 만들기 위해 학생들의 개별성을 정당하게 고려하면서 동시에 공동체를 세우기 위한 방법으로 반다이크가 제안하고 있는 다기능 학급 (Multifunctional Classroom)을 교육현장에서 구체적으로 구현하기 위한 하나의 학습모형을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 개념과 사례를 연결하여 내용 중심 기반의 지식 습득과 함께 팀에서의 문제해결을 동시에 강조하는 팀기반학습(Team Based Learning)을 대학수업에 적용하기 위한 학습모형을 개발하였다. 이 연구를 수행하기 위해 반다이크의 기독교적 관점에서의 협력학습과 다기능학급 관련 교육 이론을 탐구하고, 미켈슨과 톰슨 등이 제안한 팀기반학습의 개념과 특징을 고찰하였다. 이와 함께 기독교적 관점에서의 팀기반학습을 기초로 다기능 학급을 구현하기 위해 필요한 핵심학습과정과 핵심교수방법을 규명하여 블랜디드러닝 기반의 교수학습모형의 틀을 개발하였다. 그리고 고안된 팀기반학습 모형을 대학 수업에 적용하여 참여한 57명의 대학생을 대상으로, 총 9개의 팀을 구성하여 15주간에 걸쳐 진행하였다. 본 연구의 결과, 대학수업에서 팀기반학습을 적용 실행했을 때 기대되는 효과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공동의 관심사와 개인의 관심사 모두에 주의를 기울이는 학습방식을 제공함으로써 내용 중심 기반의 개별학습과 문제해결 중심의 집단학습 모두를 가능하게 한다. 둘째, 개인과 팀의 책임을 강조하고 토론에 적극적으로 참여하게 함으로써 서로 돕고 수용하는 분위기를 형성하고 학습자 간의 협력적인 상호작용을 촉진하여 사회성 발달에 도움을 준다. 셋째, 상호작용을 통한 다양한 관점의 공유와 즉각적인 피드백의 제공은 경청과 수용, 기다림과 인내, 책임 있는 행동 등과 같은 협력학습에 필요한 성격적인 기술 개발과 학습자들 간의 우정과 신뢰감 형성에 도움을 준다. 넷째, 사전학습과 과제수행, 그리고 수행결과 및 평가에 대해 책임을 지도록 함으로써 능동적인 참여와 학습공동체에서의 기여를 높인다.

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to make a Learning Model in order to make a Christian collaborative classroom as it concerns individual’s difference and uniqueness as well as building a collaborative community applying Van Dyk’s ‘Multifunctional Classroom’. For this, this research developed a learning model for applying team based learning, which emphasizes content centered knowledge and team centered problem solving connecting the concept and the case. This research explored collaborative learning and ‘Multifunctional Classroom’ with Van Dyk’s Christian perspective, and investigated concept and characteristics of team based learning suggested by Michaelson and Thompson. This research also developed the frame of instructional learning model based on blended learning as it deducts the core learning process and core teaching methods in order to reveal the multifunctional classroom with Christian perspective. The research was progressed for 15 weeks with 9 teams, 57 undergraduate students, who attended Team Based Learning model applied college course in blended learning environment. The effectiveness of Team Based Learning developed in Christian perspective is like the following. Firstly, it makes possible to supply individual learning and group learning to apply the needs of individuals and groups. Secondly, it forms collaborative interaction and help to improve social skills as it emphasizes on learners’ responsibilities and have the learners participate in discussion actively. Thirdly, it helps learners to develop characteristic skills required for collaborative learning such as listening, accepting, waiting, and patience. Fourthly, it leads to the active participation and contribution in the learning community as it has the learners take the responsibility on advanced learning, task performance, and evaluation.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 박성익, "블렌디드 러닝에서 효과적 온", 오프라인 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인 : 대학 강좌를 중심으로, 2007, pp.15(1), 17~45[DOI]
  2. 박은숙, "블랜디드러닝 학습모형 개발 : R2D2와 학습양식 중심으로", 교육정보미디어연구, 14(4), pp.85~110 (2008), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  3. 이영민, "이러닝 기반 팀 학습환경에서 팀인지와 팀 활동과정, 팀성과 간 상관관계 탐색", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 10(3), pp.31~38 (2007), 한국컴퓨터교육학회
  4. Bernice, M., "The 4MAT system:Teaching to learning styles" (1981), Excel
  5. Bonk, C.J., "Future direction of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings, Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives", pp.550~567 (2006), Pfeiffer
  6. Bonk, C.J., "Introducing the R2D2 Model: Online learning for the diverse learners of this world", Distance Education, 27(2), pp.249~264 (2006)
  7. Brummelen, H., "Stepping stones to curriculum: A biblical path" (1994), Alta Vista College Press
  8. Felder, R.M., "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education", Engineering Education, 78(7), pp.674~681 (1988)
  9. Felder, R.M., "Reacting the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college Science education", Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), pp.286~290 (1993)
  10. Jenifer Kreie, J., "Using team-based learning to improve students’ retention", College Teaching, 55(2), pp.51~56 (2007)
  11. Johnson, T.E., "TBL in university, Presentation in Sookmyung University" (2007), Sookmyung Univ. Unpublished
  12. Johnson, T.E., "The role of acquired shared mental model in improving the process of team based learning", Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(4), pp.18~26 (2008)
  13. Kolb, D.A., "Experiencing learning: Experience as the source of learning and development" (1984), Pretence-Hall
  14. Lim, D.H., "Online vs. Blended Learning: Differences in Instructional Outcomes and Learners Satisfaction", paper presented at academy of Human Resources Development International Conference, pp.809~816 (2006)
  15. Michaelsen, L.K., "The essential elements of team-based learning", New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 116, pp.7~27 (2008)
  16. Napier, W, "Building a team collaboration in the virtual classroom", Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development and Practice. Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2001)
  17. Napier, N. P., "Technical projects: understanding teamwork in an introductory is course", Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(1), pp.39~48 (2007)
  18. Haberyan, A., "Team-Based Learning in an industrial", organizational Psychology course, 2007, pp.9(1), 143~152
  19. Harskamp, E., "Group composition and its effect on female and male problem solving in science education", Education Research, 50(4), pp.307~318 (2008)
  20. Ortega, R. A., "Using a media centre to facilitate team-based learning", Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 29(2), pp.61~65 (2006)
  21. Osborn, A.F., "Applied Imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking" (1963), Scribner’s
  22. Thompson, B.M., "Team-based learning at ten medical schools: two years later", Medical Education, 41, pp.250~257 (2007)
  23. Van Dyke, J., "The practice of teaching Christianly. In Stuart Fowler, Christian Schooling: Education for freedom" (1993), Potchefstroom
  24. Van Dyke, J., "가르침은 예술이다" (2003), IVP
  25. Vaughan, N., "Perspectives on blended learning higher education", International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), pp.81~94 (2007)
  26. White, L. F., "Motivating students to become more responsible for learning", College Student Journal, 32, pp.190~196 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)